Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

HP Wars, Dodge Beats Toyota

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 07-11-2008, 07:21 AM
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Head is offline
Lead Driver
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,867
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Logical Heritic
Horsepower schmorsepower. The real question is who is getting the first lithium ion plug in hybrid or full electric to market.
The first to think that people will want to wait 30 minutes to a few hours to charge their car during a road trip.
 
  #17  
Old 07-13-2008, 02:13 AM
Logical Heritic's Avatar
Logical Heritic
Logical Heritic is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
On board genset gas or diesel powered with 600 mile range and you never have to charge if you choose not to do so. Google chevrolet volt, go go. Though I think toyota, honda or nissan will beat em to market. Its the way of the future. Hp wars are so passe'. Its time for the electric wars.
Chevrolet Volt - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Unlimted clean fusion power is only 40 years away. Battteries are the only answer to this nations oil gluttony. What are we 5% of the global population but somehow its rational that we burn 25% of the worldwide oil production? Dont think for a second that a battery powered car cant be fast as all hell. Unlike gasoline engines electric motors make peak torque from 0 rpm.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0MN98...eature=related
Its time for the mileage wars!
 
  #18  
Old 07-13-2008, 04:53 PM
Krochus's Avatar
Krochus
Krochus is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alma Arkansas
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Battteries are the only answer to this nations oil gluttony.
I disagree, I think compressed air is the "here and now" solution that has all the same 0 wait to charge benifets of gasoline with NONE of the downsides of battery power.

Air Car - First Air-Powered Car - Zero Emissions - Behind the Tech - Popular Mechanics

You can buy this car TODAY and get over 100miles on $4 worth of electricity.....But they ain't for sale here

The only problem is that neither are feasible with our overly stringent safety standards.
 
  #19  
Old 07-14-2008, 04:51 AM
Logical Heritic's Avatar
Logical Heritic
Logical Heritic is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That is only slightly better than a vw,similar to the rabbit, already for sale in europe that gets 72mpg is street legal and already in production. If the price of diesel hadnt spiked so high recently you would get more miles per dollar out of it than this air car you are referencing.
I havent looked that hard at air but at 4 dollars per 100 miles its already twice as much as they are claimed it is to charge a battery. They claim from 1 penny to 2 pennies per mile on battery depending. Air is a novelty and I doubt it will every be anything more. Much like the early boiler systems used on vehicles in the early 1900s. Can you imagine having to start a fire in your cars boiler 30 minutes before you leave to get the pressure up? Also once the air is gone what do you have? The same problem electric cars suffer from. You need some form of on board charging system. I bet running a compressor on gas adds up to more than 4 dollars per hundred miles.
 
  #20  
Old 07-14-2008, 05:14 AM
Krochus's Avatar
Krochus
Krochus is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alma Arkansas
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Also once the air is gone what do you have?
The same thing you have with a gasoline engine. A quick fill up at a service station. You can't do that with a battery.

We had thew whole battery vs gasoline thing hammered out 100yrs ago. There's a reason we went with gasoline
 
  #21  
Old 07-14-2008, 06:10 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1
LxMan1 is offline
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 22,436
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
Batteries lifespan isn't the greatest either (used in forklifts every day) each charge last a little less than the last and replacement cost are outrageous. Figuring in replacement batteries every few years and the savings ain't so great.
 
  #22  
Old 07-14-2008, 01:16 PM
V8EXPLR's Avatar
V8EXPLR
V8EXPLR is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denver USA
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dkf
I think you'll here many other thuds from the Dodge, Chevy, GMC and Toyota trucks also. Fords will just be the most pronounced because its heavier than the rest.
The F150 is actually lighter than a similar build Tundra. Plus the '09 F150 is suppossed to be even lighter. So it'll make the 2nd loudest thud!
 
  #23  
Old 07-14-2008, 01:19 PM
V8EXPLR's Avatar
V8EXPLR
V8EXPLR is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denver USA
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by LxMan1
Batteries lifespan isn't the greatest either (used in forklifts every day) each charge last a little less than the last and replacement cost are outrageous. Figuring in replacement batteries every few years and the savings ain't so great.
Plus the ground and water toxins created while producing the battery is horrible. When in need of replacement, how will the old batteries be disposed of? I'm sure many could find their way into landfills.
 
  #24  
Old 07-15-2008, 01:28 AM
Logical Heritic's Avatar
Logical Heritic
Logical Heritic is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What do you do with your lead acids when your done with em? Do you take em to the landfill or do you trade em in for the core charge?

Electric vs Gas. Well, there really is no comparison. Gasoline powered vehicles are horribly ineffecient. Possibly as little as 12% of the fuel burned is transfered to forward motion. How efficient is the charging and discharging of electric in comparison? How long are these batteries supposed to last and how fast do they lose maximum charge capacity? What becomes of them when they are no longer any good?

Something worth debating. The lifetime pollution of gas over battery including costs of ownership and operation. Dont forget the vox polution during transfer of fuel from tank to tank. I would even like to hear numbers on polution and energy costs of producing and maintaining solar cells. Mainly because no one talks about it and im very curious. Can solar cells put out more power than it takes to produce them? Do they in fact offset pullution or are they just a bandaid?

I aint no greenie. My 2 stroke snowmachine makes more hp than my current family car. My last truck made 500+ hp. Im watching the price of oil climb and am trying to make sound financial decisions that will save money in the longrun for my retirement. Gas guzzlers out, fuel miesers in.

http://findarticles.com/p/articles/m...v29/ai_9388217
http://www.grinningplanet.com/2004/1...ng-article.htm
Hard numbers are hard to find but it appears that electric has 3x the efficiency of gas. The batteries are recyclable and they produce significantly less polution over the lifetime of the vehicle. Using domestic coal instead of eastern oil does sound very tempting to me. We could cut our oil imports to 0.
 
  #25  
Old 07-15-2008, 02:04 AM
LxMan1's Avatar
LxMan1
LxMan1 is offline
Moderator

Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Louisville,Ky.
Posts: 22,436
Received 13 Likes on 13 Posts
I agree, there is no real data on battery life, replacement cost, etc, so it's hard to say right now how much is to be gained.
 
  #26  
Old 07-15-2008, 10:01 AM
jimandmandy's Avatar
jimandmandy
jimandmandy is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by V8EXPLR
The F150 is actually lighter than a similar build Tundra. Plus the '09 F150 is suppossed to be even lighter. So it'll make the 2nd loudest thud!
How much lighter?

Currently the Tundra is the biggest porker at 4610 base curb weight, but the F-150 is not far behind at 4570. This is for regular cab, short bed, V-6 base models. The Tundra does include A/C, A/T and huge 255/70R18 tires. "3/4 Ton" trucks used to weigh less than that empty and had double the payload.

Jim
 
  #27  
Old 07-15-2008, 11:57 AM
V8EXPLR's Avatar
V8EXPLR
V8EXPLR is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Denver USA
Posts: 819
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimandmandy
How much lighter?

Currently the Tundra is the biggest porker at 4610 base curb weight, but the F-150 is not far behind at 4570. This is for regular cab, short bed, V-6 base models. The Tundra does include A/C, A/T and huge 255/70R18 tires. "3/4 Ton" trucks used to weigh less than that empty and had double the payload.

Jim
True the F150 isn't lighter by much, but the '09 F150s have been reported to be roughly 500lbs lighter per model across the board. Now the Screw won't be nearly 500lbs lighter, being the cab is being made larger, but it is still lighter than the 04-08 model F150 Screw.

Wonder where all the weight in the Tundra is located. From my comparing the two trucks, it's not in the sheet metal. Now the F150 doesn't have thick sheet metal, but it's thicker and stronger than what they have on the new Tundras.
 
  #28  
Old 07-15-2008, 10:43 PM
jimandmandy's Avatar
jimandmandy
jimandmandy is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Running Springs CA
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Bigger wheels/tires are part of it. The rear axle is also beefier than other base trucks. Where is the F-150 going to loose 500lb?

Jim
 
  #29  
Old 07-16-2008, 12:45 AM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by jimandmandy
Bigger wheels/tires are part of it. The rear axle is also beefier than other base trucks. Where is the F-150 going to loose 500lb?

Jim
How about the totally unneed fully boxed frame? It's a 1/2 ton for god's sake. It would probably do just fine with smaller axles as well. I have heard of very few 8.8 failures. Use lighter materials.

Mike
 
  #30  
Old 07-16-2008, 01:30 AM
Logical Heritic's Avatar
Logical Heritic
Logical Heritic is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I dont think I would buy a truck that didnt have a boxxed frame again. Some weight penalties are worth paying.
 


Quick Reply: HP Wars, Dodge Beats Toyota



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:20 AM.