2009 5.4L horsepower leaked
#31
Cost of DOHC is a LOT, and I don't think a truck needs a power peak where the Cobra R's power peak is....the Honda S2000 made 240 HP out of a 2 liter engine (at like 8000 RPM's), but it wouldn't make a good truck motor because you have to rev it over 6000 RPM to get any power out of it. Pushrods and low-end torque work best for trucks, and deliver a low-priced engine. (Again, I like the 4.6 in my van, but really liked the old 300 inch six in my '78 Ford pickup for a truck motor.)
#32
First vehicle I've owned that I haven't done this myself. $325 buck later...
#33
But to be honest, I'm getting tired of doing the maintance on my vehicles myself. All the routine crap is probably going to start going to the shop. Things like oil changes.
Mike
#34
Cost of DOHC is a LOT, and I don't think a truck needs a power peak where the Cobra R's power peak is....the Honda S2000 made 240 HP out of a 2 liter engine (at like 8000 RPM's), but it wouldn't make a good truck motor because you have to rev it over 6000 RPM to get any power out of it. Pushrods and low-end torque work best for trucks, and deliver a low-priced engine. (Again, I like the 4.6 in my van, but really liked the old 300 inch six in my '78 Ford pickup for a truck motor.)
Look at the Titan, it's a torque monster down low, but runs out of steam before the pushrod HEMI. On the other hand, you have the gigantic 7.0L LS7 that Chevy somehow made it to rev a stratospheric 7000 rpm.
#36
Ford really needs to figure out how to extend the torque range of the engine.
The current 5.7 HEMI has 375 ft-lbs at about 4400 RPM, and hits about 345HP @ 5400 RPM. Those RPM numbers sound high compared to the 5.4, but when you'll look at the horsepower and torque curves, you'll see that hemi is putting out about 300 ft-lbs @ 1200 RPM, and maintains that all the way up to 4400 RPM.
The new HEMI puts out 380HP and 404 ft-lbs with a similar torque and power curve to the old HEMI
The current 5.7 HEMI has 375 ft-lbs at about 4400 RPM, and hits about 345HP @ 5400 RPM. Those RPM numbers sound high compared to the 5.4, but when you'll look at the horsepower and torque curves, you'll see that hemi is putting out about 300 ft-lbs @ 1200 RPM, and maintains that all the way up to 4400 RPM.
The new HEMI puts out 380HP and 404 ft-lbs with a similar torque and power curve to the old HEMI
#38
I think it's fine in the power and torque department.
With gas costs these days, even people who normally would not think about gas costs are now starting to say "Gee, $90 plus for a fillup. *ouch".
So, just because a truck has 380 hp or 450+ lbs of torque now, I think it's going to become immaterial and a moot point, unless you're towing a serious load (equipment, 5th wheel, camper) on a regular basis and you NEED that kind of power on a regular basis.
If somebody just occasionally tows a light boat or trailer, it makes absolutely no sense from a $$ perspective to spring for a 380 hp engine.
There is a difference between WANT and NEED, in my book anyway. I'm sure other people feel differently, or at least they will until they get to the gas station and fill up.
With gas costs these days, even people who normally would not think about gas costs are now starting to say "Gee, $90 plus for a fillup. *ouch".
So, just because a truck has 380 hp or 450+ lbs of torque now, I think it's going to become immaterial and a moot point, unless you're towing a serious load (equipment, 5th wheel, camper) on a regular basis and you NEED that kind of power on a regular basis.
If somebody just occasionally tows a light boat or trailer, it makes absolutely no sense from a $$ perspective to spring for a 380 hp engine.
There is a difference between WANT and NEED, in my book anyway. I'm sure other people feel differently, or at least they will until they get to the gas station and fill up.
#39
Well, if the Triton really does get better mileage than the competition, then the low hp is acceptable, but it doesn't. The same thing with my Explorer's 4.0 - every competition destroys it in power, but mileage wise they're all equal.
Easy to see why - the thermal efficiency of all comparable gasoline engines (by displacement) are similar. Mileage is more a function of vehicle mass and aero drag. The f150 is heavy and doesn't quite have class leading aero.
Easy to see why - the thermal efficiency of all comparable gasoline engines (by displacement) are similar. Mileage is more a function of vehicle mass and aero drag. The f150 is heavy and doesn't quite have class leading aero.
#40
#41
I think a lot of people feel that if your going to get V-8 Gas mileage, And They ARE ALL Close to the same these days.
Why not get the most H.P and Torque out of the deal ?
FORD has no options ,All Auto V-8 Line up that does nothing GREAT ! all are average at best.
How about a High H.p V-8 with class leading power and a Stick 6 Cyc with class leading mileage?. How can all those Big Bucker's at FORD justify NO effort.
Why not get the most H.P and Torque out of the deal ?
FORD has no options ,All Auto V-8 Line up that does nothing GREAT ! all are average at best.
How about a High H.p V-8 with class leading power and a Stick 6 Cyc with class leading mileage?. How can all those Big Bucker's at FORD justify NO effort.
#43
I think a lot of people feel that if your going to get V-8 Gas mileage, And They ARE ALL Close to the same these days.
Why not get the most H.P and Torque out of the deal ?
FORD has no options ,All Auto V-8 Line up that does nothing GREAT ! all are average at best.
How about a High H.p V-8 with class leading power and a Stick 6 Cyc with class leading mileage?. How can all those Big Bucker's at FORD justify NO effort.
Why not get the most H.P and Torque out of the deal ?
FORD has no options ,All Auto V-8 Line up that does nothing GREAT ! all are average at best.
How about a High H.p V-8 with class leading power and a Stick 6 Cyc with class leading mileage?. How can all those Big Bucker's at FORD justify NO effort.
Same with the 1/2 ton V8s. They all get crap mileage and from what I've heard, Ford has always been at the bottom of MPG as well. Might as well get the powerhouse of the 1/2 tons and at least be able to have fun with it.
Mike
#44