Notices
2009 - 2014 F150 Discuss the 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013 and 2014 Ford F150
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Moser

2009 5.4L horsepower leaked

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #31  
Old 05-16-2008, 11:53 PM
SMIGGS's Avatar
SMIGGS
SMIGGS is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by YoGeorge
Cost of DOHC is a LOT, and I don't think a truck needs a power peak where the Cobra R's power peak is....the Honda S2000 made 240 HP out of a 2 liter engine (at like 8000 RPM's), but it wouldn't make a good truck motor because you have to rev it over 6000 RPM to get any power out of it. Pushrods and low-end torque work best for trucks, and deliver a low-priced engine. (Again, I like the 4.6 in my van, but really liked the old 300 inch six in my '78 Ford pickup for a truck motor.)
Yes, but the competition ( Toyota and Nissan ) that is utilizing an OHC design, it's in a DOHC configuration. I'm not talking the exact motor in the Cobra R, but something as easy as different cams can make a world of difference for a truck motor....
 
  #32  
Old 05-16-2008, 11:55 PM
SMIGGS's Avatar
SMIGGS
SMIGGS is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,452
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BLK94F150
I wish they would have just stuck with pushrods and had much smaller engines that you could actually work on easier.

Mike
Funny you mention that, for the first time I actually took my truck in to get the plugs changed because there was no way in hell I was wasting my time on trying to do it myself.

First vehicle I've owned that I haven't done this myself. $325 buck later...
 
  #33  
Old 05-17-2008, 12:01 AM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SMIGGS
Funny you mention that, for the first time I actually took my truck in to get the plugs changed because there was no way in hell I was wasting my time on trying to do it myself.

First vehicle I've owned that I haven't done this myself. $325 buck later...
It's actually not as hard as it looks if you have the right tools. Basicly some extensions and u-joints. I'd say I can do in 1-1.5 hours.

But to be honest, I'm getting tired of doing the maintance on my vehicles myself. All the routine crap is probably going to start going to the shop. Things like oil changes.

Mike
 
  #34  
Old 05-17-2008, 03:28 AM
RoyJ's Avatar
RoyJ
RoyJ is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by YoGeorge
Cost of DOHC is a LOT, and I don't think a truck needs a power peak where the Cobra R's power peak is....the Honda S2000 made 240 HP out of a 2 liter engine (at like 8000 RPM's), but it wouldn't make a good truck motor because you have to rev it over 6000 RPM to get any power out of it. Pushrods and low-end torque work best for trucks, and deliver a low-priced engine. (Again, I like the 4.6 in my van, but really liked the old 300 inch six in my '78 Ford pickup for a truck motor.)
Just because an engine is DOHC doesn't mean it's a high revver. And vice versa - OHV pushrod doesn't mean lazy low revver.

Look at the Titan, it's a torque monster down low, but runs out of steam before the pushrod HEMI. On the other hand, you have the gigantic 7.0L LS7 that Chevy somehow made it to rev a stratospheric 7000 rpm.
 
  #35  
Old 05-17-2008, 04:08 AM
4x4boss's Avatar
4x4boss
4x4boss is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
320 HP and 390 Tq.........No thanks!! I'll wait for the 6.2 or look at the new dodge.
 
  #36  
Old 05-17-2008, 08:08 AM
Lead Head's Avatar
Lead Head
Lead Head is offline
Lead Driver
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 7,867
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Ford really needs to figure out how to extend the torque range of the engine.

The current 5.7 HEMI has 375 ft-lbs at about 4400 RPM, and hits about 345HP @ 5400 RPM. Those RPM numbers sound high compared to the 5.4, but when you'll look at the horsepower and torque curves, you'll see that hemi is putting out about 300 ft-lbs @ 1200 RPM, and maintains that all the way up to 4400 RPM.

The new HEMI puts out 380HP and 404 ft-lbs with a similar torque and power curve to the old HEMI
 
  #37  
Old 05-17-2008, 08:32 AM
heathk2003's Avatar
heathk2003
heathk2003 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 133
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
That 6 speed transmission is gonna be be sweet compared to what they have now. I think the gear spread is gonna be a much bigger factor than the slight engine bump.
 
  #38  
Old 05-17-2008, 10:12 AM
Powerdude's Avatar
Powerdude
Powerdude is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think it's fine in the power and torque department.

With gas costs these days, even people who normally would not think about gas costs are now starting to say "Gee, $90 plus for a fillup. *ouch".

So, just because a truck has 380 hp or 450+ lbs of torque now, I think it's going to become immaterial and a moot point, unless you're towing a serious load (equipment, 5th wheel, camper) on a regular basis and you NEED that kind of power on a regular basis.

If somebody just occasionally tows a light boat or trailer, it makes absolutely no sense from a $$ perspective to spring for a 380 hp engine.

There is a difference between WANT and NEED, in my book anyway. I'm sure other people feel differently, or at least they will until they get to the gas station and fill up.
 
  #39  
Old 05-17-2008, 11:26 AM
RoyJ's Avatar
RoyJ
RoyJ is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, if the Triton really does get better mileage than the competition, then the low hp is acceptable, but it doesn't. The same thing with my Explorer's 4.0 - every competition destroys it in power, but mileage wise they're all equal.

Easy to see why - the thermal efficiency of all comparable gasoline engines (by displacement) are similar. Mileage is more a function of vehicle mass and aero drag. The f150 is heavy and doesn't quite have class leading aero.
 
  #40  
Old 05-17-2008, 12:45 PM
Ryan50hrl's Avatar
Ryan50hrl
Ryan50hrl is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Neenah, Wisconsin
Posts: 7,698
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by 4x4boss
320 HP and 390 Tq.........No thanks!! I'll wait for the 6.2 or look at the new dodge.
Can you explain why you need more? What are you towing or hauling with your truck?
 
  #41  
Old 05-17-2008, 01:07 PM
supeRobertduty's Avatar
supeRobertduty
supeRobertduty is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 951
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
I think a lot of people feel that if your going to get V-8 Gas mileage, And They ARE ALL Close to the same these days.

Why not get the most H.P and Torque out of the deal ?

FORD has no options ,All Auto V-8 Line up that does nothing GREAT ! all are average at best.
How about a High H.p V-8 with class leading power and a Stick 6 Cyc with class leading mileage?. How can all those Big Bucker's at FORD justify NO effort.
 
  #42  
Old 05-17-2008, 01:53 PM
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl's Avatar
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl
SUPERDUTY_untouchabl is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,441
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You know gas is to expensive when it hurts to fill up your lawnmower...
 
  #43  
Old 05-17-2008, 01:59 PM
BLK94F150's Avatar
BLK94F150
BLK94F150 is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: None of your business
Posts: 3,077
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by supeRobertduty
I think a lot of people feel that if your going to get V-8 Gas mileage, And They ARE ALL Close to the same these days.

Why not get the most H.P and Torque out of the deal ?

FORD has no options ,All Auto V-8 Line up that does nothing GREAT ! all are average at best.
How about a High H.p V-8 with class leading power and a Stick 6 Cyc with class leading mileage?. How can all those Big Bucker's at FORD justify NO effort.
Exactly. If a Ranger 4.0 and an F350 V10 get within 3-4 MPG of each other, then what's the point?

Same with the 1/2 ton V8s. They all get crap mileage and from what I've heard, Ford has always been at the bottom of MPG as well. Might as well get the powerhouse of the 1/2 tons and at least be able to have fun with it.

Mike
 
  #44  
Old 05-17-2008, 03:05 PM
osbornk's Avatar
osbornk
osbornk is offline
Postmaster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Marion, VA
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SUPERDUTY_untouchabl
You know gas is to expensive when it hurts to fill up your lawnmower...
Yep. spent over $13.00 to fill up my lawn and garden tractor and over $15.00 to fill my motorcycle last week with regular.
 
  #45  
Old 05-17-2008, 03:12 PM
heymrdj's Avatar
heymrdj
heymrdj is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Fort Wayne, IN
Posts: 1,079
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I know the feeling, at 4.30 a gallon here at our remote gas station (it's only 3.75 15mi. away in town..) it costs a little over 20$ to mow all 3.5 acres.
 


Quick Reply: 2009 5.4L horsepower leaked



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:58 AM.