Notices
Modular V10 (6.8l)  

Fuel Grade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 5, 2008 | 11:34 AM
  #1  
VTOL's Avatar
VTOL
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Fuel Grade

How does the 10'er perform with lower octane fuel;
Milege I would think 2 or 3 mpg drop?
Also overall performance?
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 11:50 AM
  #2  
mackstruck's Avatar
mackstruck
Senior User
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Alabama Gulf Coast
With a fill up costing any were from $90 to $100 with 87 octane.

The choice is easy for me. Let it ping , let it ping, let ping.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 12:27 PM
  #3  
Mmaxed's Avatar
Mmaxed
Senior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 2
My '08 does not like our 86 oct regular. Doesn't ping, but no power. The 88-89 oct midgrade is much better.

I talked to a friend that said his 5.4 really liked premium so Iv'e been trying it. Not enough time to tell for sure but it looks like the premium is giving enough better mpg to more than pay for itself.

Testing will continue. Your results may vary.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 01:01 PM
  #4  
VTOL's Avatar
VTOL
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Mmaxed
but it looks like the premium is giving enough better mpg to more than pay for itself.
I think that will probaly be the case.
Thanks for the response.
Carry on.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 01:03 PM
  #5  
juterbock's Avatar
juterbock
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, NC
I was running 93 in my 01 V10 but I finally replaced the fuel filter and then the O2 sensors in hopes of fixing this. On 93 octane I got no ping and 12mpg. With new fuel filter, O2 sensors and 87octane after two tanks of gas, no ping and ~14mpg. I used the bosch sensors with ~16" wires. Easy swap out, all you need is the sensors and the right size wrench, lay under your truck and replace. The passenger side would be hard for someone with shorter arms (I'm 6'4" and could barely reach the clip for the wiring with one hand). I have ~$110 in the sensors and $10 in the filter plus release tool for another $5.

If you're running 87 and it is pinging like mad, you are likely getting much worse gas milage than if you ran the 93 and had no ping. I had previously gotten ~14mpg with 87 and then went to 91 and 93 as the pinging probably required. I kept milage up most of that time but it finally started falling off. I would recommend either figuring out how to get rid of the ping or paying the 20-30 cents a gallon extra for the 93. Either way you will have a lot more power and most likely better gas milage. When you get low teens for gas milage a single MPG is a significant cost savings. Here is an example using current prices of the station by my house:

93 octane $3.89/gal
87 octane $3.55/gal

If you get 14mpg with 93octane that costs you $0.28 per mile
If you get 12mpg with 87octane that costs you $0.30 per mile
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 01:05 PM
  #6  
juterbock's Avatar
juterbock
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, NC
P.S.

If you are running a stock tune and everything about your engine and emissions is in order the 93 octane is not going to help milage, it in theory should only drain your wallet.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 01:20 PM
  #7  
VTOL's Avatar
VTOL
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Juterbock,
I take it these numbers are based on the 2001 4x4 in your sig line is that correct?
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 01:22 PM
  #8  
VTOL's Avatar
VTOL
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Mmaxed, what kind of numbers MPG are you seeing on your ride?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 5, 2008 | 01:23 PM
  #9  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
87 vs 93 with stock tuning is a waste of money. Getting 2mpg better on 93 sounds like BS to me, but if thats the case sounds like the truck has problems. Custom tuning should be looked into. I've run 87 from day one on my truck with no pinging even when towing.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 02:33 PM
  #10  
Mmaxed's Avatar
Mmaxed
Senior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 446
Likes: 2
I agree with those that say 93 is not needed with a stock tune. My rig may have a problem or may not be broke in good yet with 9300 miles. Maybe we are just getting summer time fuel. There is no doubt however that the higher octane fuel is netting better performance, especialy at cruise rpm, and better milage at the pump. No pinging no matter what fuel is in the tank.

On the 88 octane I was getting 10.5-11.5 mpg. The last tanks of 92 have yielded 12-12.5.

Where I really notice the perfomance is pulling hills. On 88 the rig would have to downshift or at least come out of lockup to maintain the set speed. Most of the time with 92 it just cruises over with no trouble. The engine even has a different tone. A cleaner, crisper, healthier sound as compared to a dead blaaaaa on the 88 oct.

It could be that whatever the computer uses to sense pinging is over active and pulls the timing to much on this rig. It will be going to the dealer for a checkup when I get the time.
 
Reply
Old May 5, 2008 | 02:51 PM
  #11  
VTOL's Avatar
VTOL
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Mmaxed
It will be going to the dealer for a checkup when I get the time.
Hopefully they can tweak a 1 or 2 MPG for ya.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 09:44 AM
  #12  
juterbock's Avatar
juterbock
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 220
Likes: 0
From: Oxford, NC
The milage I reference is the 01 4X4 with a stick and a lead foot. I had problems, and I have finally figured them out. New O2 sensors and a fuel filter have brought me back to the 13-14mpg with 87 octane.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 09:56 AM
  #13  
dkf's Avatar
dkf
Hotshot
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 40
From: Pa
Originally Posted by juterbock
The milage I reference is the 01 4X4 with a stick and a lead foot. I had problems, and I have finally figured them out. New O2 sensors and a fuel filter have brought me back to the 13-14mpg with 87 octane.
Good to hear. 93 octane is like $.30+ more a gallon than 87, it adds up quickly.
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 10:00 AM
  #14  
VTOL's Avatar
VTOL
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 22
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by juterbock
The milage I reference is the 01 4X4 with a stick and a lead foot. I had problems, and I have finally figured them out. New O2 sensors and a fuel filter have brought me back to the 13-14mpg with 87 octane.
Good info Right On!
 
Reply
Old May 6, 2008 | 10:08 AM
  #15  
brownja's Avatar
brownja
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
Just to muddy the waters...

It used to be that, if you're vehicle was designed for, and ran ok, on regular, there was no benefit to using more expensive grades.

Now, (and here's where it gets messy) some brands of gas use 10% in ethanol in all their gas, some only in regular grade. Most often the pumps have a label that says "gasoline MAY contain 10% ethanol" so it is not easy to know for sure if they are using it, or in what grade.

If the place you normally fill up at uses 10% ethanol in regular, but not in premium, the decrease in MPG from the ethanol in regular, MAY undo the cost saving over premium.

As always, your milage WILL vary.
If you think you get better mileage with premium, you may be right.

Cheers,
jb
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:38 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE