Notices
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Early Eighties Bullnose Ford Truck

1985 ford info needed

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 06:07 PM
  #1  
CDF302v8's Avatar
CDF302v8
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 266
Likes: 0
From: Michigan
1985 ford info needed

<HR style="COLOR: #d1d1e1" SIZE=1> <!-- / icon and title --><!-- message --><TABLE width="100%" border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top>Does anyone know how much torque and hp a 1985 ford f150 with a 302 V8 has?

Thank you!
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 07:16 PM
  #2  
uncle.stosh's Avatar
uncle.stosh
Postmaster
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,658
Likes: 5
From: Out of here
Not enough.........
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 08:09 PM
  #3  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,475
Likes: 2,800
Club FTE Gold Member
SOMEWHERE on here there was a chart of all the engines over the years. I can't find it.

APPROX IIRC numbers:

HP: 185 @ 4400 rpm

Torque: 255 @ 2400-2800 rpm

+/- a bit, maybe, possibly.

This will bring the chart out of course...
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 08:11 PM
  #4  
bedmondo's Avatar
bedmondo
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
i dont know of the rpm levels but i thought it was 185hp and 275lbs torque
 
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2008 | 11:55 PM
  #5  
Piffery1's Avatar
Piffery1
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,635
Likes: 0
From: Niceville, FL.
1983 49 States: 119 hp @ 3400 rpm, 250 ft-lb @ 2000 rpm.
1983 Calif: 141 hp @ 3600 rpm, 249 ft-lb @ 2000 rpm.
Per 1983 Ford Light Truck Specifications Book.
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 09:47 AM
  #6  
Sycostang67's Avatar
Sycostang67
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,491
Likes: 16
From: Kuna ID
Originally Posted by uncle.stosh
Not enough.........
Haaahaaahhaaaa
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 02:39 PM
  #7  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,475
Likes: 2,800
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Piffery1
1983 49 States: 119 hp @ 3400 rpm, 250 ft-lb @ 2000 rpm.
1983 Calif: 141 hp @ 3600 rpm, 249 ft-lb @ 2000 rpm.
Per 1983 Ford Light Truck Specifications Book.

Every year in the '80s the HP went up, esp. when the engines when EFI.

In the above specs, is it possible the 119 hp for 49 states is typo, and should be 149?
 
Reply
Old May 1, 2008 | 11:10 PM
  #8  
klause85f150's Avatar
klause85f150
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
From: Federal Way
Originally Posted by Sycostang67
Haaahaaahhaaaa
Hell, I have an 85 351 and it's bad, I can't imagine how bad it is for our smaller bretheren.

Cheers!!!
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old May 2, 2008 | 03:30 AM
  #9  
srercrcr's Avatar
srercrcr
Postmaster
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,854
Likes: 0
119 hp is correct. about the same as the six cylinder. After all, it's 302 ci vs 300 ci.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 04:27 AM
  #10  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 784
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by 85e150six4mtod
In the above specs, is it possible the 119 hp for 49 states is typo, and should be 149?
119 = Certified Net Horsepower.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 05:28 AM
  #11  
ri_truck_guy's Avatar
ri_truck_guy
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 2,091
Likes: 3
From: Suffolk, VA USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by Piffery1
1983 49 States: 119 hp @ 3400 rpm, 250 ft-lb @ 2000 rpm.
1983 Calif: 141 hp @ 3600 rpm, 249 ft-lb @ 2000 rpm.
Per 1983 Ford Light Truck Specifications Book.
It's the torque figures that surprise me...I've alsways been told the 302's power band is much higher the a 300's. Peak torque at 2000 rpm is something I would expect from the 300 with a 302's being somewhere around 3000 rpm.

Horsepower is nothing more than an artificial number to describe how fast an engine can generate torque. It's not really the important number.
 
Reply
Old May 2, 2008 | 02:14 PM
  #12  
85e150's Avatar
85e150
Super Moderator
20 Year Member
Community Builder
Liked
Community Favorite
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 34,475
Likes: 2,800
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by NumberDummy
119 = Certified Net Horsepower.

The reason I question it is the California number is 141 hp in that post and 49 state numbers are usually a bit higher, not 22 horse lower.

Yea, hp is an artificial number but it serves as a reference point and if calculated according to a set standard, allows a meaningful comparison between engines. Thus, even though the torque figures are similar between the 300 and 302, the HP figure tells the rest of the tale on power. You could do the same thing with another torque reading at peak rpm, but the HP figure is easier to deal with.
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:19 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE