Modular V10 (6.8l)  

Thinking of removing the CAT - any future problems?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #46  
Old 04-28-2008, 05:18 PM
Meanie's Avatar
Meanie
Meanie is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Not comparing performace by any means, it just sounds like a tached out viper when the truck in under load.

Yes my truck is a crew cab 4x4, with the off road package and the STOCK dry weight is 10,640 also shown on the title and the door sticker and verified by my personal scales I use to balance my race car since I couldn't belive it for myself.
 
  #47  
Old 04-28-2008, 06:08 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Meanie
Completely incorrect. I removed mine and replaced with a length of 3" pipe. Here's my experience with it after 10,000k

1. Ford pre-programs a rich condition into the computer to help the converter retain its efficiency, so after I removed it I noticed a very minute amount of black smoke from the tail pipe. Corrected it with leaning the system out a little resulting in some power gain.

2. LOUD LOUD LOUD! The converter has honey-comb catalyst in it (I'm sure you know already), It does have great muffling capability but it also created backpressure. I have a flowmaster 3" Cat-back and it's a bit loud but doesn't sound bad by any means. Similar to a viper at WOT.

3. Was able to advance the ignition timing 3 deg more than what I had it before. Any pinging you might have will most likely be gone since the engine can breathe better.

4. I noticed a good amount of a fuel mileage increase (2-3) MPG.

5. Really easy to do, cut the pipe as close to the joint at which the cat is welded, separate the non-welded joint at the rear of the converter and replace with 2 18"x3" sections of pipe from autozone.

6. You have to read through your states DMV regulations for inspection. I noticed someone stated PA inspections as I am living in PA currently, PA doesn't require emission inspection in vehicles over 9000 lbs. My truck weighs in at 10,600 so I was exempt. The inspection criteria for the required "safety inspection" includes the "Exhaust inspection for leaks" step. Inspectors are not required to inspect for emissions equipment and cannot require you to repair the vehicle for a removed catalytic converter as this inspection is for general safety and not emissions/safety as most highway vehicles are.

7.YES it does make a power gain, significant one too. a plugged cat is definately a restriction but even the cat itself is a restriction. Throttle response is affected along with mid-range torque and a mpg gain also.
Do you have any dyno results? The 2-3mpg gain you claim by removing the cat is somewhat comical. I'm running headers, a cat that is almost a straight pipe, free flowing mandrel bent exhaust, CAI and a custom tune a I see little to no increase in mpg on my truck over stock. Ever heard of the pleceibo effect? I stand by what I said, if the cat is not plugged and working properly there will be little performance gain and minimal mpg gains. Why does every other "Tuner" on here say the from the factory the air/fuel ratio is lean, you say its rich.

Inspection and registration goes by GVWR not the weight of your truck. I've lived in PA all my life. PA only does a visual inspection of emmision and exhaust components. If your truck has the cat removed it SHOULD FAIL inspection according to PA regulations for light duty trucks under 11,001lbs. GVWR. It is also in violation of federal law to remove a converter. 067 Pa. Code §*175.80.*Inspection procedure. You may be able to get around having a CAT in PA if your over 11,000lbs GVWR as I see no rules regarding it.Pennsylvania Code However it is still illegal to remove it under Federal Law.

The GVWR for an 04' F-350 SRW is 9700-9900lbs and a DRW is 11,000-11,500lbs.
 
  #48  
Old 05-06-2008, 05:18 PM
Meanie's Avatar
Meanie
Meanie is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
"Do you have any dyno results? The 2-3mpg gain you claim by removing the cat is somewhat comical. I'm running headers"

woo hoo, you may also know that headers on this truck make just about no difference due to the cat restricting the exhaust downstream. I have headers also and noticed NO change from stock (minus sound). Also, the combination of parts I have added has attributed to the resulting mileage, not one thing alone. simpleton. (In all actuallity, the free spin hubs made the most difference)

"However it is still illegal to remove it under Federal Law."

However, everyone understands that here. We are all automotive enthusiasts and know what we should and shouldn't do and what we can get away with. I just told you a way around the inspection criteria for the state of PA, one that I have experienced for three years of inspection for, not for the US.

"If your truck has the cat removed it SHOULD FAIL inspection according to PA regulations for light duty trucks under 11,001lbs. GVWR"

Damn, you are good "Sherlock", but if they can't look for it, they can't look for it. The emissions exemption states they cannot inspect for the parts to be installed and unfortunatley that number you just stated is actually 9001 lbs. over that PA considers them to be heavy duty vehicles. (read farther)

"Why does every other "Tuner" on here say the from the factory the air/fuel ratio is lean, you say its rich."

Bold statement, but if you would have read my first post completely you would have noticed that I had a rich condition after the cat removal causing black smoke, I called Diablosport and they told me that the manufacturer created the rich condition to retain the efficiency of the catalyst and that was before I had even installed a tune.

"I stand by what I said, if the cat is not plugged and working properly there will be little performance gain and minimal mpg gains"

And there you stand, alone.
 
  #49  
Old 05-06-2008, 05:34 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Originally Posted by Meanie
"Do you have any dyno results? The 2-3mpg gain you claim by removing the cat is somewhat comical. I'm running headers"

woo hoo, you may also know that headers on this truck make just about no difference due to the cat restricting the exhaust downstream. I have headers also and noticed NO change from stock (minus sound). Also, the combination of parts I have added has attributed to the resulting mileage, not one thing alone. simpleton. (In all actuallity, the free spin hubs made the most difference)

"However it is still illegal to remove it under Federal Law."

However, everyone understands that here. We are all automotive enthusiasts and know what we should and shouldn't do and what we can get away with. I just told you a way around the inspection criteria for the state of PA, one that I have experienced for three years of inspection for, not for the US.

"If your truck has the cat removed it SHOULD FAIL inspection according to PA regulations for light duty trucks under 11,001lbs. GVWR"

Damn, you are good "Sherlock", but if they can't look for it, they can't look for it. The emissions exemption states they cannot inspect for the parts to be installed and unfortunatley that number you just stated is actually 9001 lbs. over that PA considers them to be heavy duty vehicles. (read farther)

"Why does every other "Tuner" on here say the from the factory the air/fuel ratio is lean, you say its rich."

Bold statement, but if you would have read my first post completely you would have noticed that I had a rich condition after the cat removal causing black smoke, I called Diablosport and they told me that the manufacturer created the rich condition to retain the efficiency of the catalyst and that was before I had even installed a tune.

"I stand by what I said, if the cat is not plugged and working properly there will be little performance gain and minimal mpg gains"

And there you stand, alone.
Pipe down sport, got touchy right away didn't ya. I'm still awaiting dyno results. You got a link to the exemption its very possible I didn't see it. You really need to pipe down a tad instead of being an **** right away.
 
  #50  
Old 05-06-2008, 05:46 PM
Meanie's Avatar
Meanie
Meanie is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You wanna go that way eh? Weel, for one I have no dyno runs, it's all seat of the pants here and with 180,000 miles on the clock of my truck, I can feel gains, anyone could. If you weren't such a sarcastic putz I might continue, but now as I see how you are, I'm done.

PS: Who the **** has a dyno in the US large enough to support a lifted f-350 cc swb? last one I was on could barely fit my 95 t-bird.
 
  #51  
Old 05-06-2008, 05:48 PM
Meanie's Avatar
Meanie
Meanie is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you would have read this "067 Pa. Code §*175.80.*Inspection procedure." you would have noticed that the inspection is for passenger cars under 9001 lbs. Try again.
 
  #52  
Old 05-06-2008, 05:50 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
What mileage did you change to headers and remove the cat? With many miles on the cat it could have been partially clogged or sooted up. I would also suggest reading FTE guidlines as well. If you can't handle people questioning your posts maybe you should stay out of the forums.
 
  #53  
Old 05-06-2008, 05:56 PM
meanv10's Avatar
meanv10
meanv10 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Meanie

PS: Who the **** has a dyno in the US large enough to support a lifted f-350 cc swb? last one I was on could barely fit my 95 t-bird.
my truck can fit on a dino, with room to.
 
  #54  
Old 05-06-2008, 06:17 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
"If you would have read this "067 Pa. Code §*175.80.*Inspection procedure." you would have noticed that the inspection is for passenger cars under 9001 lbs. Try again."

I've read it several times already. Please point me into the right direction. 067 Pa. Code §*175.80 is under "Subchapter E Passenger Cars and Light Trucks" I am not seeing the 9,001lb GVWR restriction you mention.
 
  #55  
Old 05-06-2008, 06:26 PM
MisterCMK's Avatar
MisterCMK
MisterCMK is offline
Fleet Owner
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Blue Hill Township
Posts: 24,708
Received 55 Likes on 45 Posts
Originally Posted by Meanie
PS: Who the **** has a dyno in the US large enough to support a lifted f-350 cc swb? last one I was on could barely fit my 95 t-bird.
I watched a F-350 CC DRW dyno down in the Twin Cities without a problem.
 
  #56  
Old 05-06-2008, 06:37 PM
dkf's Avatar
dkf
dkf is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Pa
Posts: 10,101
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Lifted truck on a dyno. Impressive numbers too.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/7...p-882-fpt.html
 
  #57  
Old 05-06-2008, 07:24 PM
verumlike's Avatar
verumlike
verumlike is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Paso Robles, CA
Posts: 515
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dkf
Lifted truck on a dyno. Impressive numbers too.
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/7...p-882-fpt.html
Find a dyno id fit on =-P
 
  #58  
Old 05-06-2008, 09:31 PM
meanv10's Avatar
meanv10
meanv10 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by verumlike
Find a dyno id fit on =-P
PLEASE tell me you dont have the 5.4L in that
 
  #59  
Old 05-07-2008, 04:04 PM
krewat's Avatar
krewat
krewat is offline
Site Administrator
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Long Island USA
Posts: 42,561
Received 307 Likes on 157 Posts
Originally Posted by meanv10
PLEASE tell me you dont have the 5.4L in that
It's got Powerstroke emblems on it
 
  #60  
Old 05-07-2008, 05:34 PM
meanv10's Avatar
meanv10
meanv10 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 699
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by krewat
It's got Powerstroke emblems on it
good call, missed that one, now PLEASE tell me its not the 6L. lol
 


Quick Reply: Thinking of removing the CAT - any future problems?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:02 AM.