Notices

Older 351 Block Limits

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:05 PM
  #1  
Bossman89's Avatar
Bossman89
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Older 351 Block Limits

I have an early to mid '70's 2 main 351 W block and was wondering how fast you can turn one before throwing the bottom end out. Also I am looking at putting some explorer gt-40P heads on it and was wondering on how many cc's those heads have. I checked some older posts and they seem to be 58cc but I thought I would make sure. I'm building a local circle track car and I know this is a truck forum but you guys have never let me down with the small blocks and also I'm trying to get it to turn about 6,000 rpms and have around 11:1 cr. I've heard the older blocks are stronger but thought I would check with you guys first.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 06:50 PM
  #2  
ibleedblue1385's Avatar
ibleedblue1385
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,213
Likes: 0
From: Parma, MI
Im not sure about the heads. As far as 6,000 rpm goes, get a main girdle, and use ARP bolts and you should be fine. And of course, get the rotating assembly balanced.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 09:17 PM
  #3  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
+1 on what Jesse said, use high quality fasteners and enough valve spring and she'll take that without issue.
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 09:31 PM
  #4  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
Just what they all said...


what are the rules about these mods??
 
Reply
Old Mar 12, 2008 | 11:18 PM
  #5  
Bossman89's Avatar
Bossman89
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Thanks guys good to hear the block is good to go and Ill definetly plan on using good hardware and Ill make sure to get enough spring for the cam I choose.

Originally Posted by HemiEater
what are the rules about these mods??
Well you can use up to 351 60 over and you have to have ford factory heads along with stock manifolds thats why i thought the gt40ps would be great because i have to use stock manifolds and they have great flow along with added compression. You can have HEI and no cams above .410 lift at valve which i can live with because this a common .4 lift rule and there are a few cams out there for the windsor with these lifts. The only bad thing is that i will most likely be the only ford in the field (and proud of it ) which means i probably need to play by the rules for a while because you know how chevy guys can get . They do have the fords handicapped by making them run smaller valves than the chevy boys but thats why Im hoping the gt40ps can make up the difference. Also you have to use a magnetic steel crank and rods.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 01:48 AM
  #6  
Beanscoot's Avatar
Beanscoot
Cargo Master
15 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 2,071
Likes: 36
From: British Columbia
"Also you have to use a magnetic steel crank and rods."

Huh?
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 05:38 AM
  #7  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
using stock heads, intake and manifolds with .4 lift cam you might want to shoot for a lower rpm range when you gear it. It might spin to 6000 but how much power will it make there??

not much of a roundy round guy... I'm more tuned for the 1/4 mile..
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 08:20 AM
  #8  
Bossman89's Avatar
Bossman89
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Beanscoot
"Also you have to use a magnetic steel crank and rods."

Huh?
Yeah who knows there are some weird rules but I just know the crank has to be above 50 lbs and no h-beam rods which is fine with me because I dont have the money to get those.

And the cams i've looked at for the .4 in rule puts the rpms up around 6,000. The rpms do seem high and you would think the motor couldn't breathe but I have to check but I might be able to run an aftermarket aluminum intake either way I know the chevy boys are getting them on average around 5600-6200 rpms.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 08:34 AM
  #9  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Wow.. the 0.410 lift rule sucks.. I hate to say it but your motor will be 75-100hp below what the Chev and Mopar guys will have with the same specs.. the Ford heads don't flow anywhere near what the other guys heads do, so just be aware you are starting with a big handicap. What car are you using and is there a minimum weight limit? If possible use a unibody car and strip it to the bare minimim to make it as light as possible.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 11:44 AM
  #10  
Bossman89's Avatar
Bossman89
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Well I read somewhere in an old post about the flow numbers of the gt40ps and they were quite amazing considering they are stock castings but i cant find the post again and the numbers were compared to other ford heads and aftermarket. I was also considering using a 302 motor because I thought I could feed the motor better because of the shorter stroke which I thought could increase the volumetric efficiency, but I would take a loss in torque. I also might try getting different ratio rockers for valve lift, either way i kinda understand why there are no fords running in this class and i have nothing against a chevy but I really want to run a ford and I have enough parts laying around to build one. You have to run a full frame car and 3200 lbs so I'm going to run an older ltd crown victoria and put a '90s thunderbird body on it for weight and aerodynamics.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 01:44 PM
  #11  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Originally Posted by Bossman89
Well I read somewhere in an old post about the flow numbers of the gt40ps and they were quite amazing considering they are stock castings but i cant find the post again and the numbers were compared to other ford heads and aftermarket.
My blood runs Ford Blue so don't think I'm trying to discourage you.. I'm not. The sad reality is all you got to do is swap a 4bbl intake and LT headers on a stock SBC or Mopar and you got 1hp/cu inch. All the dyno figures I have seen for stock 5.0HO with the same parts are around 275HP, a stock truck 5.8 only hits 250hp with it's smaller cam and the same E7TE heads. The GT40P is a much better casting, but how much better? One of the 5.8 crate motors from Ford with the GT40 heads produces 385HP.. but it needs the Z303 roller cam to do it.. 0.552" lift and 228 duration, that's a lot more than the stock truck cam. I'm guessing.. but I'd say the GT40P heads on a stock truck 5.8 will produce 300hp maybe... hopefully I'm guessing low.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 06:37 PM
  #12  
Bossman89's Avatar
Bossman89
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Its depressing to know chevys are that easy to build but I made a model engine in desktop dyno and I got a decent power curve that peaks around 5500 rpms and makes approximately 355 hp and 371 ftlbs which isnt that accurate because of the generic exhaust options and Im going to try adding in the 302 with the same stuff. I even plugged in the flow numbers of the gt40p heads from:

http://www.jason.fletcher.net/tech/flowdata/castiron.htm (interesting site with a lot of flow numbers)

Either way Ill try my best and hopefully it wont be to slow but atleast there will be a ford in the pack because its a sad sight when you dont see any fords racing.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 06:54 PM
  #13  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
why not build a clevor.... Like mine... stock heads..
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 08:04 PM
  #14  
Bossman89's Avatar
Bossman89
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by HemiEater
why not build a clevor.... Like mine... stock heads..
Yeah I thought about that because I read your clevor stuff from those links you have a while back but I got a feeling they might notice the adapter plates for the intake but who knows there not used to seeing fords. I also thought about trying a cleveland motor because they are technically a 351 and I have one sitting in an old bronco that has no title.
 
Reply
Old Mar 13, 2008 | 08:07 PM
  #15  
HemiEater's Avatar
HemiEater
Postmaster
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2,656
Likes: 1
run the cleveland....for sure...
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:30 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE