When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Hey guys I'm new to tyhe site. I'm Looking at getting a new DD. 1996 1997 F 250 CC Short box. The question is does the truck have TTB like all other 250s.
Or does it have a D50 monobeam axle (just a rumor i heard). I have never had a chance to crawl under on of these trucks.
F250 will have either a D44 or D50 ttb, and a F350 will have a D60 monobeam. if stock. alot of people switched the ttb for a D60 monobeam, so i is possible to find a F250 with a D60 in it, but it was added by a previous owner after it was built by ford.
It most certainly has a Dana 50 TTB, most of these trucks do. None of them came with the Dana 50 monobeam, only a few years of the Superduty (99-01 I beleieve) came with those axles. As for the Dana 60 monobeam, a few owners have swapped these in, but your chances of finding one of these trucks for sale is pretty slim. Good luck finding a truck!
I could never understand why all the manufactures of pick up trucks went to idependant suspensions for a better ride. A truck is a truck, if someone wants a nice ride buy a car.
I dunno, Tom...I think I'm going to have to respectfully disagree with you, up to a certain point in time, anyway. When Ford introduced the Twin I-beam, trucks were still, well...TRUCKS! Ford found a good way to get away from the solid front axle without going to a short/long arm suspension, a la Shivvy (then on the other hand, you have the Dodges, which hung on to the solid front axle WAAAAY too long!). Even back in 1980 when Ford came out with the Twin Traction-Beam, they still weren't the citified piece-of-crap front ends that we have to deal with today.
But I'm not COMPLETELY disagreeing with you...it's the city folk who ruined truck suspensions. The other day I saw a '97-'03 F-150 and thought, "I'll NEVER own one of those!" and I mean it. I've long thought that a good solution for city folks is to kill SUVs and shove AWD station wagons down their throats. 99% of those people never use trucks and SUVs for their intended purpose (the H2 and H3 Hummers spring instantly to mind, but I reckon Durangos, Escapes, Explorers, etc. can be lumped into that category, too), so a station wagon would be just what they need.
OK, rant mode off...I, too, am sick of what city people have forced the manufacturers to do to trucks.
Pat