Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Sherman Tanks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 11:55 PM
  #1  
jreilly57's Avatar
jreilly57
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Hacienda Heights, CA
Sherman Tanks

I was reading that the US Army's Sherman tank was powered by a big Ol' Ford V-8. The tank, although it stemmed the tide of WW-II because of the overwhelming numbers it was built, was known as the "Ronson" because of it's propensity to explode when hit in the right place because of it's gasoline powered engine. Was that engine a flathead??? What other V-8's did Ford make in the early 40's?
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 01:46 AM
  #2  
kooper909's Avatar
kooper909
Laughing Gas
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: New York
Nope, dual overhead cam. All aluminum, 1100 cubic inches.

Photo ... http://www.enginehistory.org/Feature.../FordGAA_1.JPG

and video ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rt5uSx3eFYU
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 02:04 AM
  #3  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 790
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by jreilly57
The [Sherman] tank, although it stemmed the tide of WW-II because of the overwhelming numbers it was built, was known as the "Ronson" because of it's propensity to explode when hit in the right place because of its gasoline powered engine.
Sherman Tank = aka Purple Heart Boxes.

North African Campaign: When asked by General Patton if the German shells penetrated the armor, one soldier said: "No sir, the shells come in one side and rattle around a bit."

Patton then turned to General Bradley and said: "I warned them (US Army general staff) about the *&%$# tanks, one hit...and the gasoline explodes!"
 

Last edited by NumberDummy; Dec 5, 2007 at 02:08 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #4  
bobbytnm's Avatar
bobbytnm
Roast em' if you got 'em
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 22,041
Likes: 10,052
From: Rio Rancho, NM
Club FTE Gold Member
Cadillac also supplied power plants for tanks. I think all the manufacturers retooled their factories in one way or the other for the war effort.

Bobby
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #5  
TheWiz427's Avatar
TheWiz427
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,964
Likes: 1
From: Woodruff, SC
Didn't the later ones have a radial engine?
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 04:35 PM
  #6  
dffay's Avatar
dffay
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 531
Likes: 1
From: New Mexico
And, conversely, the Piasecki HUP tandem rotor helicopter was powered by an air cooled radial Tank engine that had powered many of the era tanks. Apparently they had a problem sucking valves which is more problematic in a helo than a tank. Tank's don't have to auto-rotate. Gotta love government surplus.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 04:46 PM
  #7  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 790
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by bobbytnm
Cadillac also supplied power plants for tanks. I think all the manufacturers retooled their factories in one way or the other for the war effort. Bobby
By government order, civilian production of passengers cars and trucks ended on February 10, 1942 for all the automakers.

All the assembly and other plants nationwide were turned over to the War Production Board.

btw: The 1947 Tuckers (all 51 of them) were powered by a flat six helicopter engine supplied by Air-Cooled Motors of Syracuse NY, formerly known as the Franklin Motor Car Company. Tucker "engineers" converted the air cooled Franklin engine to water cooling.
 

Last edited by NumberDummy; Dec 5, 2007 at 04:54 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #8  
DR Smith's Avatar
DR Smith
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 29
From: northeast Ga
Question tank v8

Anyone got one of those tank motors in their tuck?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #9  
Steel357's Avatar
Steel357
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
Some guys on youtube put one in a mustang. How many people can say that they have a Sherman tank engine under the hood?

How much do ya think one of those would go for?
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 09:59 PM
  #10  
Col Flashman's Avatar
Col Flashman
Postmaster
25 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 10
From: La Verne, California
Originally Posted by TheWiz427
Didn't the later ones have a radial engine?
The majority of all early versions U.S. manufactured Amourered Vehicles had Radials installed, because that was the most readily available engine @ the time.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #11  
jreilly57's Avatar
jreilly57
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Hacienda Heights, CA
So was the 1100 HP dohc aluminum motor Ford made for the Sherman a Ford design? And even if it wasn't why couldn't they use the experience to develop their own modern V-8? I mean, why would Ford stick with the antiquated Flathead through '53 if they had the technology to build a much more modern power plant for the Sherman? Why wouldn't a smaller version be made for their trucks? It just seems they stuck with the old flathead and ultimately let Chevy become the standard V-8 for race cars in the mid to late 50"s.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 10:07 PM
  #12  
Col Flashman's Avatar
Col Flashman
Postmaster
25 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 10
From: La Verne, California
Originally Posted by dffay
And, conversely, the Piasecki HUP tandem rotor helicopter was powered by an air cooled radial Tank engine that had powered many of the era tanks. Apparently they had a problem sucking valves which is more problematic in a helo than a tank. Tank's don't have to auto-rotate. Gotta love government surplus.
All radials instaled in Armourered Vehicles were Aircraft engines, which are manfuactured to run @ constant RPM's & this caused problems for those Tank Driver/Mechanics because of constantly Fowling of the Plugs.
Then there's getting them started after setting awhile. Oil pools in the cylinders & the engines had to be hand cranked to blow the oil out of the cylinders before starting them, in order to keep from blowing the heads off the cylinders.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #13  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 790
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by jreilly57
So was the 1100 HP dohc aluminum motor Ford made for the Sherman a Ford design? And even if it wasn't why couldn't they use the experience to develop their own modern V-8? I mean, why would Ford stick with the antiquated Flathead through '53 if they had the technology to build a much more modern power plant for the Sherman? Why wouldn't a smaller version be made for their trucks? It just seems they stuck with the old flathead and ultimately let Chevy become the standard V-8 for race cars in the mid to late 50"s.
I'm no expert on what Ford engines were used in tanks, but FoMoCo at President Roosevelts request, hurridly signed a contract in 1941 to build Rolls-Royce Merlin aircraft engines in the US for the war effort. Ford's limited engineering department took one look at the complicated R-R Merlin specs, and said...forget it.

The contract was passed to Packard who built thousands of the engines, which became the Packard-Merlin because they simplified the design.

Who actually designed that 1100 cid DOHC engine? I doubt Ford had much if anything to do with it. Henry Ford was senile, Harry Bennett and his "goon squad' were running the company, and Ford Motor was hide bound and in terrible shape during WWII. The conditions were so bad, that the War Production Board got 21 year old Henry Ford II ("The Deuce") out of the US Navy to take over the helm (Edsel died in 1943 of bleeding ulcers). Henry refused to allow this, but finally gave in when his wife Clara told him she'd sell her Ford stock if he didn't relent.
 

Last edited by NumberDummy; Dec 5, 2007 at 11:02 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 06:32 AM
  #14  
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 27,303
Likes: 1,062
From: NM
Originally Posted by jreilly57
So was the 1100 HP dohc aluminum motor Ford made for the Sherman a Ford design? And even if it wasn't why couldn't they use the experience to develop their own modern V-8? I mean, why would Ford stick with the antiquated Flathead through '53 if they had the technology to build a much more modern power plant for the Sherman? Why wouldn't a smaller version be made for their trucks? It just seems they stuck with the old flathead and ultimately let Chevy become the standard V-8 for race cars in the mid to late 50"s.
I'm sure the DOHC V8 cost a fortune, and was probably extremely labor-intensive. It was very heavy too. OHC technology was around since 1912 or so, it wasn't a big advantage.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #15  
dffay's Avatar
dffay
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 531
Likes: 1
From: New Mexico
The flatheads, by Ford (and Cadillac --btw BobbyTNM) had a great life however in the stunning Chris Craft boats. The sound and the lines of those boats were really incredible.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE