Notices
1948 - 1956 F1, F100 & Larger F-Series Trucks Discuss the Fat Fendered and Classic Ford Trucks

Sherman Tanks

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 4, 2007 | 11:55 PM
  #1  
jreilly57's Avatar
jreilly57
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Hacienda Heights, CA
Sherman Tanks

I was reading that the US Army's Sherman tank was powered by a big Ol' Ford V-8. The tank, although it stemmed the tide of WW-II because of the overwhelming numbers it was built, was known as the "Ronson" because of it's propensity to explode when hit in the right place because of it's gasoline powered engine. Was that engine a flathead??? What other V-8's did Ford make in the early 40's?
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 01:46 AM
  #2  
kooper909's Avatar
kooper909
Laughing Gas
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 890
Likes: 0
From: New York
Nope, dual overhead cam. All aluminum, 1100 cubic inches.

Photo ... http://www.enginehistory.org/Feature.../FordGAA_1.JPG

and video ... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rt5uSx3eFYU
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 02:04 AM
  #3  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by jreilly57
The [Sherman] tank, although it stemmed the tide of WW-II because of the overwhelming numbers it was built, was known as the "Ronson" because of it's propensity to explode when hit in the right place because of its gasoline powered engine.
Sherman Tank = aka Purple Heart Boxes.

North African Campaign: When asked by General Patton if the German shells penetrated the armor, one soldier said: "No sir, the shells come in one side and rattle around a bit."

Patton then turned to General Bradley and said: "I warned them (US Army general staff) about the *&%$# tanks, one hit...and the gasoline explodes!"
 

Last edited by NumberDummy; Dec 5, 2007 at 02:08 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 04:18 PM
  #4  
bobbytnm's Avatar
bobbytnm
Roast em' if you got 'em
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 21,988
Likes: 9,853
From: Rio Rancho, NM
Club FTE Gold Member
Cadillac also supplied power plants for tanks. I think all the manufacturers retooled their factories in one way or the other for the war effort.

Bobby
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 04:32 PM
  #5  
TheWiz427's Avatar
TheWiz427
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 5,964
Likes: 1
From: Woodruff, SC
Didn't the later ones have a radial engine?
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 04:35 PM
  #6  
dffay's Avatar
dffay
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 531
Likes: 1
From: New Mexico
And, conversely, the Piasecki HUP tandem rotor helicopter was powered by an air cooled radial Tank engine that had powered many of the era tanks. Apparently they had a problem sucking valves which is more problematic in a helo than a tank. Tank's don't have to auto-rotate. Gotta love government surplus.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 04:46 PM
  #7  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by bobbytnm
Cadillac also supplied power plants for tanks. I think all the manufacturers retooled their factories in one way or the other for the war effort. Bobby
By government order, civilian production of passengers cars and trucks ended on February 10, 1942 for all the automakers.

All the assembly and other plants nationwide were turned over to the War Production Board.

btw: The 1947 Tuckers (all 51 of them) were powered by a flat six helicopter engine supplied by Air-Cooled Motors of Syracuse NY, formerly known as the Franklin Motor Car Company. Tucker "engineers" converted the air cooled Franklin engine to water cooling.
 

Last edited by NumberDummy; Dec 5, 2007 at 04:54 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 06:20 PM
  #8  
DR Smith's Avatar
DR Smith
Fleet Mechanic
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,532
Likes: 29
From: northeast Ga
Question tank v8

Anyone got one of those tank motors in their tuck?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 06:24 PM
  #9  
Steel357's Avatar
Steel357
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
From: Upland, CA
Some guys on youtube put one in a mustang. How many people can say that they have a Sherman tank engine under the hood?

How much do ya think one of those would go for?
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 09:59 PM
  #10  
Col Flashman's Avatar
Col Flashman
Postmaster
25 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 9
From: La Verne, California
Originally Posted by TheWiz427
Didn't the later ones have a radial engine?
The majority of all early versions U.S. manufactured Amourered Vehicles had Radials installed, because that was the most readily available engine @ the time.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #11  
jreilly57's Avatar
jreilly57
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 201
Likes: 0
From: Hacienda Heights, CA
So was the 1100 HP dohc aluminum motor Ford made for the Sherman a Ford design? And even if it wasn't why couldn't they use the experience to develop their own modern V-8? I mean, why would Ford stick with the antiquated Flathead through '53 if they had the technology to build a much more modern power plant for the Sherman? Why wouldn't a smaller version be made for their trucks? It just seems they stuck with the old flathead and ultimately let Chevy become the standard V-8 for race cars in the mid to late 50"s.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 10:07 PM
  #12  
Col Flashman's Avatar
Col Flashman
Postmaster
25 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2000
Posts: 3,890
Likes: 9
From: La Verne, California
Originally Posted by dffay
And, conversely, the Piasecki HUP tandem rotor helicopter was powered by an air cooled radial Tank engine that had powered many of the era tanks. Apparently they had a problem sucking valves which is more problematic in a helo than a tank. Tank's don't have to auto-rotate. Gotta love government surplus.
All radials instaled in Armourered Vehicles were Aircraft engines, which are manfuactured to run @ constant RPM's & this caused problems for those Tank Driver/Mechanics because of constantly Fowling of the Plugs.
Then there's getting them started after setting awhile. Oil pools in the cylinders & the engines had to be hand cranked to blow the oil out of the cylinders before starting them, in order to keep from blowing the heads off the cylinders.
 
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2007 | 10:54 PM
  #13  
NumberDummy's Avatar
NumberDummy
Ford Parts Specialist
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 88,826
Likes: 785
From: Simi Valley, CA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by jreilly57
So was the 1100 HP dohc aluminum motor Ford made for the Sherman a Ford design? And even if it wasn't why couldn't they use the experience to develop their own modern V-8? I mean, why would Ford stick with the antiquated Flathead through '53 if they had the technology to build a much more modern power plant for the Sherman? Why wouldn't a smaller version be made for their trucks? It just seems they stuck with the old flathead and ultimately let Chevy become the standard V-8 for race cars in the mid to late 50"s.
I'm no expert on what Ford engines were used in tanks, but FoMoCo at President Roosevelts request, hurridly signed a contract in 1941 to build Rolls-Royce Merlin aircraft engines in the US for the war effort. Ford's limited engineering department took one look at the complicated R-R Merlin specs, and said...forget it.

The contract was passed to Packard who built thousands of the engines, which became the Packard-Merlin because they simplified the design.

Who actually designed that 1100 cid DOHC engine? I doubt Ford had much if anything to do with it. Henry Ford was senile, Harry Bennett and his "goon squad' were running the company, and Ford Motor was hide bound and in terrible shape during WWII. The conditions were so bad, that the War Production Board got 21 year old Henry Ford II ("The Deuce") out of the US Navy to take over the helm (Edsel died in 1943 of bleeding ulcers). Henry refused to allow this, but finally gave in when his wife Clara told him she'd sell her Ford stock if he didn't relent.
 

Last edited by NumberDummy; Dec 5, 2007 at 11:02 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 06:32 AM
  #14  
ALBUQ F-1's Avatar
ALBUQ F-1
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 27,291
Likes: 1,055
From: NM
Originally Posted by jreilly57
So was the 1100 HP dohc aluminum motor Ford made for the Sherman a Ford design? And even if it wasn't why couldn't they use the experience to develop their own modern V-8? I mean, why would Ford stick with the antiquated Flathead through '53 if they had the technology to build a much more modern power plant for the Sherman? Why wouldn't a smaller version be made for their trucks? It just seems they stuck with the old flathead and ultimately let Chevy become the standard V-8 for race cars in the mid to late 50"s.
I'm sure the DOHC V8 cost a fortune, and was probably extremely labor-intensive. It was very heavy too. OHC technology was around since 1912 or so, it wasn't a big advantage.
 
Reply
Old Dec 6, 2007 | 08:38 AM
  #15  
dffay's Avatar
dffay
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 531
Likes: 1
From: New Mexico
The flatheads, by Ford (and Cadillac --btw BobbyTNM) had a great life however in the stunning Chris Craft boats. The sound and the lines of those boats were really incredible.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:28 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE