Notices

Concerned about compression ratio

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 04:24 PM
  #1  
John72_CS's Avatar
John72_CS
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Concerned about compression ratio

All right, here's what I've got.

It's my 390, thing's bored 0.030" over. I picked up the TRW/SpeedPro forged pistons. Now, assuming my rods are the right length, trying to figure out how much I need to have trimmed (since they have to be, 428 crank, which is btw, .02 under, rods and mains) so I can get 9.5:1 or less. Pretty sure around here I'll have problems with 10:1.

I spoke to the shop doing my heads. The combustion chambers are 69cc's.

Been playing with Dyno2000, and per their compression ratio math, if I have the piston at .1" from TDC with 43cc's of volume above the piston (not counting the space of the chambers or the gasket, assuming felpro .041" displacing 10.1cc's) says it'll get me to 9.47:1 compression. If I tell it I have flat top pistons, it tells me that I'll have 9.48:1.

Now, I have been looking, and with a stock 390 crank it looks like the TRW's would give me around 10:1 with 72cc heads. But with the 428 crank we have to mill.

Is .1" gonna be enough off the pistons? I want to get as close to 0-deck height as I can. Rough guess as to what we'll need to carve out of the eyelets after the mill?

Sorry if I've had a bunch of questions but I really want to build this motor up right, and have it last me for a good long while. And I don't want to have to deal with putting in octane boosters every time I fill up.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 04:46 PM
  #2  
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
Concerned about compression ratio

Getting 9.5:1 from your setup is going to be very difficult. I don't know how much the TRWs can be shaved but you want to maintain a zero deck. I would recommend enlarging the combustion chamber. Otherwise you will end up with thin pistons and still a lot of compression. Desktop dyno's compression calculator sucks. It doesn't take into account everything and is difficult to use. I know of a good one that uses microsoft access and it is great.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 04:49 PM
  #3  
John72_CS's Avatar
John72_CS
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Concerned about compression ratio

[updated:LAST EDITED ON 28-Jun-02 AT 05:53 PM (EST)]err, restate that.

Pistons are here. Care to hazard a guess at how much to enlarge the chambers? And would a thicker gasket help? (Or would it be worth the extra trouble, since it could theoretically be weaker and more likely to break)
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 05:56 PM
  #4  
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
Concerned about compression ratio

You are right about a thicker gasket. I wouldn't know where to find one anyway. I'll do a quick calculation and see ho much you would need to go.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 06:08 PM
  #5  
Ratsmoker's Avatar
Ratsmoker
Post Fiend
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 6,624
Likes: 8
From: Missouri
Concerned about compression ratio

With regular felpro gaskets and milling your pistons down to acheive zero deck you will have 11.84:1 compression. Remember you are increasing the stroke so bringing it up to zero deck with a longer stroke seriously increases compression. To get the compression down to 9.65:1 you would need 89.1cc combustion chambers. Are you going to run nitrous? I don't know if you can get your chambers that big and still be safe. I would recommend running 1976 stock 390 pistons which are really 410 pistons. These puppys already have a dish to them
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 06:30 PM
  #6  
John72_CS's Avatar
John72_CS
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 113
Likes: 0
Concerned about compression ratio

No, no nitrous. But 89 cc's seems a bit large. Wonder if the trw's will have enough space... hrm. Suppose I could go ahead and get a set of the sterling cast pistons, and see if I can return the trw's.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 06:47 PM
  #7  
karljay's Avatar
karljay
Cargo Master
25 Year Member
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 2,281
Likes: 18
From: Northern California
Concerned about compression ratio

I was in the same boat that your in. I bought some 390 60 over L2291F forged pistons with a 390 kit. I then found a 428 crank and wanted to use the pistons.

I found some C7AE-A heads from a 67 TBird (74 cc). I enlarged the chambers to 80.5 cc by removing all the casting and getting to a smooth surface, then unshrouding the valves.

The actual difference in the pistons would be .1 I had mine zero decked for best squish effect and ended having about .08 taken off. I measured the pistons at the thickest point and it was over .5" so .08 wouldn't be a problem.

I used a standard sized gasket and didn't carve any more from the eyebrows.

I THINK I got it down to 10.25 but it could be a touch higher. It cranks at 205~210 with < 100 miles on it and hasn't broken in the rings yet.

I knew this was going to be a problem from the start and I did several things to help:

I got the Edelbrock alum water pump and 160 high flow T stat and ground out the water passage in the intake and heads for better flow (you'd be surprised how much they're off). I blocked off the exhaust cross over in the heads and run the 4 row jumbo rad on an F250. I had a pro curve the dist given all the engine specs and now I'm looking for a cooler plug and cold air intake.

I've been able to run reg gas so far, but I haven't put any real miles on it yet.

By the way the C7AE-A large chamber heads are cheap and have the same basic port size and the common C8AE-H heads.

Hope this helps.
 
Reply
Old Jun 28, 2002 | 07:22 PM
  #8  
big block power's Avatar
big block power
Senior User
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 465
Likes: 0
Concerned about compression ratio

 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:56 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE