Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

96 5.0 cam selection

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 03:08 PM
  #1  
BEWOLD's Avatar
BEWOLD
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: CANADA
96 5.0 cam selection

This has probably been beat to death already but I am looking to upgrade my 96 5.0 mass air with the usual bolt ons. long tubes, exhaust, intake mods(cold air,tb spacer), cam, roller rockers. WHAT IS A GOOD CAM? truck is reg cab shortbox 4x4 5spd 3.55 gears that is used mostly offroad. (I know, not that great gearing for offroad) This year is a roller cam is it not? checked a couple cam web sites not really enough info for me. heard its better to call tech, But looking for some real world experience anyway. Oh and lastly does anyone know cyl head specs for this truck? Heard GT40Ps are good budget upgrade?
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #2  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
The Mustang HO cam is a good upgrade. The Comp Cams 35-349-8 is a bigger upgrade. You want something with specs like this to give a broad powerband, a heavy truck with a 5.0 needs all the help it can get.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 04:52 PM
  #3  
Blurry94's Avatar
Blurry94
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 71
From: Calhoun GA
Club FTE Gold Member
If you're on a budget, a Mustang 5.0 roller cam works well (advanced 2 degrees) in a truck, and there are off-the-shelf cams that'll give you a little more than that as well. The best option would be to go with a custom grind though...no guess work.

Plug changes with GT-40P's and long tube headers can be a major pain. The regular GT-40 heads are still better than the standard truck heads and plug changes are much easier.
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 05:02 PM
  #4  
flareside_thunder's Avatar
flareside_thunder
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 2
From: Florida
Depending on your budget for heads....try www.thumperoforangepark.com....ported E7's with decent prices...I agree go custom grind...takes the guessing andalot of headaches out of figuring things....
 
Reply
Old Aug 15, 2007 | 06:36 PM
  #5  
BEWOLD's Avatar
BEWOLD
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: CANADA
How do I do a custom grind? is this when I call the manufacturer and just tell them my truck specs and what I am looking for. From a budget stand point ive heard when it comes to porting its almost more cost effective to just buy better heads to start, unless you do it yourself and I'm not about to go much further than gasket-port match. True/False. flareside thunder the site you list doesnt seem to go anywhere is it spelled wrong? thanks for the info guys.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 08:47 AM
  #6  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
I like the idea of a custom grind cam, but I'm afraid if you mention anything about "fuel economy" or "sniffer tests" when talking to the cam guy you'll get a stick very similar to the stock grind.. basically a waste of your time to change it. Both the cams I mentioned above as well as others will pass emissions tests and help fuel milage if you can keep your foot out of it. The stock motor benefits from cams with lift up to 1/2", more lift = more power.
 

Last edited by Conanski; Aug 16, 2007 at 08:55 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 09:10 AM
  #7  
Blurry94's Avatar
Blurry94
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 71
From: Calhoun GA
Club FTE Gold Member
That's odd... I've read several post from quite a few GEN 1 owners that have gone the custom grind route. They all seem to be very pleased with the way they perform and I don't remember any of them saying that they failed a smog test.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 09:30 AM
  #8  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Oh..I bet the majority are satisfied customers, but there will be some that will get underwhelming results because of how they describe what they want. If somebody asks for a cam that will give the most power without hurting fuel milage, then they'll get a grind very similar to stock. If they ask for the most power possible with the stock computer then they will get a very different grind. It's all in what you say..and don't say, just like getting money out of the Gov't or an insurance company.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 11:36 AM
  #9  
Blurry94's Avatar
Blurry94
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 71
From: Calhoun GA
Club FTE Gold Member
I agree, if the main purpose was to save fuel mileage. I did mention the 5.0 Mustang cam as an option which would be a good, inexpensive upgrade.
I didn't see any info regarding saving fuel mileage and given the list of future modifications and main purpose of the vehicle (off-road), I'm thinking that fuel mileage isn't that much of concern here...at least, it hasn't been mentioned up to this point.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 04:20 PM
  #10  
flareside_thunder's Avatar
flareside_thunder
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,757
Likes: 2
From: Florida
sorry... www.thumperoforangepark.com
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 05:02 PM
  #11  
Mr. M's Avatar
Mr. M
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 843
Likes: 1
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by Conanski
The Mustang HO cam is a good upgrade. The Comp Cams 35-349-8 is a bigger upgrade. You want something with specs like this to give a broad powerband, a heavy truck with a 5.0 needs all the help it can get.
I've been very impressed with the 35-308-8 grind with a roller 5.0. Not to say the 349-8 wouldn't be a good upgrade, but I've run this cam for over 15,000 miles now. Cylinder head upgrades would also benefit this cam.

Use the recommended valve springs for the set with 0.533" lift.
 
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 06:31 PM
  #12  
BEWOLD's Avatar
BEWOLD
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 388
Likes: 0
From: CANADA
Yes definetly offroad only. Truck sees a trip to town and the landfill once a month but thats about it, Which would explain the boggers. No smog testing in Alberta yet. again, thanks for the input. Anyone know the approx combustion chamber volume of the stock heads?
 

Last edited by BEWOLD; Aug 16, 2007 at 06:34 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 16, 2007 | 11:15 PM
  #13  
Blurry94's Avatar
Blurry94
Moderator
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,548
Likes: 71
From: Calhoun GA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally Posted by flareside_thunder
I looked at that and they list their #3 (proven 12's) looks to be tailored to the Mustang crowd. In a truck, that wont get anything close to 12's, with those parts alone. They're also using off-the-shelf cams that would work well in a car too, so that's something else to think about.
 

Last edited by Blurry94; Aug 16, 2007 at 11:19 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 05:22 PM
  #14  
live2ride's Avatar
live2ride
New User
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Hey guys, I had a question about this cam issue as well. How do I know which cams are compatible with my computer? The one cam from comp cams that was mentioned (35-349-8) says that it is compatible with OBD 1 on the comp cams site, but summit says it isn't computer controlled compatible....can anyone suggest a cam that would work well with a stock '91 F150 5.0. I plan on upgrading the exhaust and intake at some point as well. Thanks guys.
 
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 06:01 PM
  #15  
Mr. M's Avatar
Mr. M
Elder User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 843
Likes: 1
From: Redmond, WA
Originally Posted by live2ride
Hey guys, I had a question about this cam issue as well. How do I know which cams are compatible with my computer? The one cam from comp cams that was mentioned (35-349-8) says that it is compatible with OBD 1 on the comp cams site, but summit says it isn't computer controlled compatible....can anyone suggest a cam that would work well with a stock '91 F150 5.0. I plan on upgrading the exhaust and intake at some point as well. Thanks guys.
If the lobe separation is 114* I believe it will. If you have any specific questions, I would recommend you call Comp Cams during business hours.

If you have upgraded to a MAF system, you have a tremendous selection of cams to select as opposed to SD.

Hope this helps,
Mike
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:38 AM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE