FTE is gettin...
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
From: Jackson,Tn
FTE is gettin...
old , i hate to say it , but after a while on a forum , i get burnt out , i have got burnt out on many racin forums. its gettin about time for a change , so i may slack off on my postin, but if i do slip up and stay gone a while i sugest one of yall send me a message on myspace and make me get my azz back over here 
, its been nice meetin all yall great people and makin friends....
Dustin
wats wrong with me ?
, its been nice meetin all yall great people and makin friends....Dustin
wats wrong with me ?
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,575
Likes: 11
From: Puyallup, WA
ya, I can understand this - I wain and wax on here myself.
Right now though I am waiting to get my rotator cuff repaired surgicly, so FTE is my "hobby" for now, as I am not wrenching right now... Guess it is a good time to be looking for my dream truck
David
Right now though I am waiting to get my rotator cuff repaired surgicly, so FTE is my "hobby" for now, as I am not wrenching right now... Guess it is a good time to be looking for my dream truck
David
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
From: Location, Location.
FTE-General could sometimes use an expansion of range of topics beyond "favourite deodorant?" or "why my neighbour sucks".
This has been troubling me for the past few days if you want to sink your teeth into something: What is the average age of water molecules on the planet? That is, water is compoesed of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. So in theory water molecules can be formed and broken up. But, are there any natural processes on earth that can either form or split up water molecules? Or is the number of water molecules on the planet fixed?
Why think about this? It came out of a conversation about the importance of water conservation.
This has been troubling me for the past few days if you want to sink your teeth into something: What is the average age of water molecules on the planet? That is, water is compoesed of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom. So in theory water molecules can be formed and broken up. But, are there any natural processes on earth that can either form or split up water molecules? Or is the number of water molecules on the planet fixed?
Why think about this? It came out of a conversation about the importance of water conservation.
Trending Topics
Government Teat-sucker
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,748
Likes: 1
From: Virginia Beach
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,422
Likes: 0
From: Jackson,Tn
KT - i tell u wat , if you can get ahold of her , i will stay 
yall said its slow in the summer , but in the winter , i want ever be on here either , i will be sittin in a deerstand allllll the time ... then the only post i will make will be of the big azz deer i kill 
yall said its slow in the summer , but in the winter , i want ever be on here either , i will be sittin in a deerstand allllll the time
... then the only post i will make will be of the big azz deer i kill
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,254
Likes: 0
From: Location, Location.
Here's another: Carbon cycle.
Everyone's concerned about carbon dioxide in the air as a greenhouse gas. And one way of dealing with it, it's been suggested, is to plant trees. Why? Because all plants grow by sucking CO2 out of the air, using energy from photosynthesis to split the CO2 up into Carbona nd Oxygen, and using the carbon to build stems and leaves. That is, they clean CO2 out of the air.
BUT - this of course means they only do this while they're growing. Eventually they die, and the carbon is either returned to the soil, or returned to the air as the methane by-product of decomposition. So, unless the mass of vegetable matter on the planet increases endlessly, the system in fact returns as much carbon to nature as it consumes. The only way to peranently remove carbon from the air is to permanently increase the mass of vegetable matter.
No?
Everyone's concerned about carbon dioxide in the air as a greenhouse gas. And one way of dealing with it, it's been suggested, is to plant trees. Why? Because all plants grow by sucking CO2 out of the air, using energy from photosynthesis to split the CO2 up into Carbona nd Oxygen, and using the carbon to build stems and leaves. That is, they clean CO2 out of the air.
BUT - this of course means they only do this while they're growing. Eventually they die, and the carbon is either returned to the soil, or returned to the air as the methane by-product of decomposition. So, unless the mass of vegetable matter on the planet increases endlessly, the system in fact returns as much carbon to nature as it consumes. The only way to peranently remove carbon from the air is to permanently increase the mass of vegetable matter.
No?
Fleet Owner
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 25,090
Likes: 1,112
From: Rio Rico, AZ.
Originally Posted by fred_79f250
Here's another: Carbon cycle.
Everyone's concerned about carbon dioxide in the air as a greenhouse gas. And one way of dealing with it, it's been suggested, is to plant trees. Why? Because all plants grow by sucking CO2 out of the air, using energy from photosynthesis to split the CO2 up into Carbona nd Oxygen, and using the carbon to build stems and leaves. That is, they clean CO2 out of the air.
BUT - this of course means they only do this while they're growing. Eventually they die, and the carbon is either returned to the soil, or returned to the air as the methane by-product of decomposition. So, unless the mass of vegetable matter on the planet increases endlessly, the system in fact returns as much carbon to nature as it consumes. The only way to peranently remove carbon from the air is to permanently increase the mass of vegetable matter.
No?
Everyone's concerned about carbon dioxide in the air as a greenhouse gas. And one way of dealing with it, it's been suggested, is to plant trees. Why? Because all plants grow by sucking CO2 out of the air, using energy from photosynthesis to split the CO2 up into Carbona nd Oxygen, and using the carbon to build stems and leaves. That is, they clean CO2 out of the air.
BUT - this of course means they only do this while they're growing. Eventually they die, and the carbon is either returned to the soil, or returned to the air as the methane by-product of decomposition. So, unless the mass of vegetable matter on the planet increases endlessly, the system in fact returns as much carbon to nature as it consumes. The only way to peranently remove carbon from the air is to permanently increase the mass of vegetable matter.
No?
Actually more about how crude oil ended up in the ground in the first place.
The commonly accepted theory is that crude oil was originally millions upon millions of years of dead dinosaurs, plant life, etc that died on the surface of the earth.
I can believe that. There are dinosaur bones petrified in various places on the planet's surface.
But if you look at the life cycle of the modern forests there is an exchange going on at the surface only. Trees, animals, etc grow up, mature, and die. They fall to the ground and decompose.
They are recycled via scavengers, bacteria, mushrooms, worms, etc.
Nowhere is the cycle that fed the vast underground wells of crude oil still happening on earth.
Why is that?
How did the crude oil get in the ground by the cubic mile and now that process of nature is now stopped?
Or is it really dinosaur based?