When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
You guys are looking at this from the same perspective I did. Ford hires engineers/designers, to make sure it's quick to assemble on the line. After that, another set has to figure how long it will take to disassemble and repair for the flat rate book.
I agree. If the people who design the stuff also had to repair and maintain it, things would be a lot different.
And that's why all the warranty work at dealerships is complete nonsense. In all honesty a tech nowadays has to be able to out think the engineers(keep it simple) if he wants to make a living at it. My one service writer and I agreed the other day that if you take the warranty time and double it that's usually how long it will take you to do the job in real time. Hm, kinda' makes me wonder why I'm still there. . .
of course the junkyard trannys from CA have to be trucked to TN so thats added into the costs.. I tend to purchase from the junkyard i know so this way they give me decent parts the first time around
However - back in the day, if a car ever got to 100,000 miles, the owner would brag considerably, and then start shopping for a replacement. It took lots of periodic maintenance and sane, reasonable driving to get that far. A good car was one you could hop in, and drive to California.
Lotsa folks today get to 150,000 or more without so much as changing their plugs. (Some of the really ambitious even change the filters.) And now, 300,000 is the new bragging point.
I was gonna chime in with the money part, but CheapRanger beat me to it.
Some folks I know call it "Design for build" metrics, versus "Design for service" metrics.
Ford doesn't service vehicles; it only builds them, and they make their designs so that they're cheap to build. They don't give a care about servicing them.
Someone once said to me that if cars were designed to be serviced, they'd be twice as expensive.
My problem with long service lives is that I start running into parts availability problems. 200-300K on a vehicle isn't all THAT difficult, but when you can't get parts any more, it all goes out the window.
My problem with long service lives is that I start running into parts availability problems. 200-300K on a vehicle isn't all THAT difficult, but when you can't get parts any more, it all goes out the window.
-blaine
No kidding. And it's often the linkage/fasteners and small bushings that disappear first. I'm finding this starting to happen with my '93 F-150, and it's only got 125K on it. I use it mostly as a horse or trash hauler, and see no reason to get rid of it...it's in a-1 shape...but I'm getting concerned that sooner than later I'll get stuck with a repair needing a dealer part that's not available, and beyond my skill to fabricate.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.