Notices

Back pressure a mith?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 02:29 PM
  #16  
KubotaOrange76's Avatar
KubotaOrange76
Its Comin Right for us!
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 11,993
Likes: 2,540
From: GA
backpressure is bad, you want an exhaust system to give the right exhaust velocity for the intended rpm range
 
Reply
Old Jul 19, 2007 | 11:38 PM
  #17  
"Beemer Nut"'s Avatar
"Beemer Nut"
Post Fiend
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,658
Likes: 4
From: "Islander"
The perfect motor build would be one where the cam is ground to match your low back pressure high velocity exhaust system as well the intake system for the intended motor use and rpm range. Lets not forget gearing, altitude, temperature and weight of vehicle.
The local muffler butcher shops seem to just slam in Flowmasters no matter the vehicle and charge you big money.
 

Last edited by "Beemer Nut"; Jul 19, 2007 at 11:43 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 20, 2007 | 10:47 AM
  #18  
Bear River's Avatar
Bear River
Former ******
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 2
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
Yeah, unfortuantely the perfect system is nearly impossible to build at a price that would ever return your investment. Having more valves with variable valve timing improves flow and exhaust velocity, but adds complexity to the engines. This decreases reliability and also tends to increase combustion temperatures. Even then you would have the problem that an exhaust that produces maximum torque and high exahust velocities at low RPM becomes restrictive at higher RPM. Solutions to this can be made with very complex exhaust systems that use diverter valves, with a smaller exhaust sytem for low RPM, and once the exhaust pressure reaches a certain point, the valve switches to the larger exhaust system. This is not practical at all, but it would work.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 05:41 AM
  #19  
ec_fritz's Avatar
ec_fritz
Junior User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 86
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by KubotaOrange76
backpressure is bad, you want an exhaust system to give the right exhaust velocity for the intended rpm range
Exactly, the existance of backpressure is not a myth but the idea that you need it for low end torque most certainly is.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 07:36 AM
  #20  
phil6608's Avatar
phil6608
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 18,157
Likes: 0
From: Stanton DE
Originally Posted by jimdandy
Backpressure is real. It is caused by a restriction, or restrictive exhaust system. Some are more restrictive than others.

What you have to watch out for in changing the exhaust system on a carburated engine is the fuel mixture. Remember that gas flow starts at the carb and continues thru the exhaust system. Exhaust flow also affects intake flow. If the carb is jetted at a certain level of tune for intake/exhaust flow, and you open the exhuast to a higher flow rate, it could cause a lean condition in the fuel mixture. This is what burns valves, pistons, and causes detonation, pre-ignition, and engine damage. It is not the fact that you have reduced the backpressure, as this is what you want to do to achieve better exhaust flow, but the fact that you changed the system tune in doing so. You may have to re-jet the carb to compensate.

You do not have these problems on computer controlled engines as the O2 sensors see the changes and correct the mixture automatically. jd
When I put my long tube headers on my truck it did affect my A/F mix!
My tuner had to adjust for the headers.
 
Reply
Old Jul 31, 2007 | 05:59 PM
  #21  
hoxiii's Avatar
hoxiii
Postmaster
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,711
Likes: 2
From: Pittsburgh
The concepts being thrown around here are correct, but the mechanism behind them seems to be a bit shaky.

Fluid flow through a pipe can be explained in two ways, laminar (straight, high speed) and turbulent (low speed).

An automotive exhaust sytem functions most efficiently when the flow is laminar as it does aid in the scavenging effect within the exhaust and cylinders. Most factory exhaust are designed to provide laminar flow at low RPM since this IS where most of your driving time is spent. Now this does create a restriction on the top end as the motor will try to expell more gas than the exhaust can handle.

Now, when you put "too large" of an exhaust sytem on a vehicle the exhaust flow is turbulent at low RPM. So what happens is when the flow goes turbulent it actually CREATES back pressure. The gas starts to roll and more or less stays in one place creating a backup within the pipe and heads.

THAT is why people who put headers on stock motors notice a loss of off idle power, since at that point the back pressure within the system has actually been increased.

Now this same motor with the same exhaust will pull harder at higher RPM when the exhaust flow becomes great enough to re-establish laminar flow which re-establishes the scavenging effects within the motor.

So what you want is the smallest exhaust possible that will still support the RPM range in which you drive the most. I like staying conservative since I'd rather lose a little up top than alot down low.

Justin
 
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 12:10 AM
  #22  
"Beemer Nut"'s Avatar
"Beemer Nut"
Post Fiend
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,658
Likes: 4
From: "Islander"
Originally Posted by hoxiii

Fluid flow through a pipe can be explained in two ways, laminar (straight, high speed) and turbulent (low speed).

An automotive exhaust sytem functions most efficiently when the flow is laminar as it does aid in the scavenging effect within the exhaust and cylinders. Most factory exhaust are designed to provide laminar flow at low RPM since this IS where most of your driving time is spent.

THAT is why people who put headers on stock motors notice a loss of off idle power, since at that point the back pressure within the system has actually been increased.Justin
How does one get "laminar" flow thru a cast iron log of a 2x4 bolted to the heads no matter the rpm's?

I have never seen logs that were replaced with headers that caused increased back pressure, this with a pressurse gauge test on ports in the exhaust manifold be it logs or header ports as well in the collectors. Granted down stream of the manifold / header back pressure could be from pipe diameter, length and muffler used.

There isn't a flow but rather a exhaust pressure pulse your dealing with plus a exhaust gas thermal temperature.
Pressure, temperature, volume, sonic speed all play into this, manufactures design a system with a trade off between performance, noise and the biggest
factor of all cost.
We performance thinking animals do not have that cost limit item in our exhaust systems. What is the best trade off for the vehicle manufactures isn't necessarily a trade off to a performance person.
 

Last edited by "Beemer Nut"; Aug 1, 2007 at 12:23 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 1, 2007 | 07:10 AM
  #23  
kens64's Avatar
kens64
Posting Guru
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,214
Likes: 0
From: Rio Rancho USA
Originally Posted by Beemer Nut
How does one get "laminar" flow thru a cast iron log of a 2x4 bolted to the heads no matter the rpm's?

I have never seen logs that were replaced with headers that caused increased back pressure, this with a pressurse gauge test on ports in the exhaust manifold be it logs or header ports as well in the collectors. Granted down stream of the manifold / header back pressure could be from pipe diameter, length and muffler used.

There isn't a flow but rather a exhaust pressure pulse your dealing with plus a exhaust gas thermal temperature.
Pressure, temperature, volume, sonic speed all play into this, manufactures design a system with a trade off between performance, noise and the biggest
factor of all cost.
We performance thinking animals do not have that cost limit item in our exhaust systems. What is the best trade off for the vehicle manufactures isn't necessarily a trade off to a performance person.
Well said.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 12:01 AM
  #24  
GIP1979's Avatar
GIP1979
Freshman User
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 35
Likes: 0
MYTH not mith.
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 07:02 PM
  #25  
Keepin It Real's Avatar
Keepin It Real
Elder User
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 913
Likes: 0
zpmps2, get the headers. Your horsepower will increase. Your fun will increase. Food will taste better. The air will seem fresher, and you will have more energy and self-confidence than you ever thought possible!
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 08:17 PM
  #26  
johnboy427's Avatar
johnboy427
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,299
Likes: 2
From: The Vieux Ford, Kansas
I would go for the headers but don't get the cut outs unless you have a serious motor, I had a warmed up 289 in a 68 mustang cam was a little over .500 lift i'm wanting to say (don't remember for sure) 270 duration, long tube headers, and full length 2 1/2 duals with dynomax mufflers it would go 14.2s in the 1/4 when I opened up the cut outs it was well into the 16s. I cant help but think this tourque loss would hurt a heavy truck with big tires even more, and those things leaked all the time.
-Johnboy
 
Reply
Old Sep 7, 2007 | 11:14 PM
  #27  
Bear River's Avatar
Bear River
Former ******
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 4,901
Likes: 2
From: Salt Lake City, Utah
I would go for smog legal headers too, even if you are not smogging the vehicle. Smog legal are easier to install, and have more attention to detail. They allow you to keep the smog equipment or bypass them, whichever your pleasure is.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
USMC616
Excursion - King of SUVs
6
May 31, 2015 12:58 PM
panzerbulldog
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
Apr 21, 2015 08:05 AM
PAJARONEGRO
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
15
May 24, 2013 10:48 PM
Ferrariferg
1967 - 1972 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
May 13, 2012 12:06 AM
must88gt50
Engine Swaps
2
Nov 10, 2011 09:37 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:15 AM.