239 performance?
Thanks
Gerald
There was a large difference in performance, driveability, and mileage, all to the positive. I would have liked to have run duals, but didn't get the chance yet. That motor (239) is still on the stand, but one day, when I finish it, it will have ECZ-G heads and my set of Ramshorns -- I'll post what that does when I'm done.
(added) -- I'm sure that you recognize that you won't be able to make a 239 suitable for "heavy duty" applications, such as dealing with big blocks or even smaller fry. It isn't any larger than the mundane 6 cylinder "bread and butter" engines of the past, with low compression and a very mild cam. If your expectations are reasonable, however, I think you'd find the increases you can obtain to be gratifying.
Last edited by wild.bunch; Jun 2, 2007 at 07:47 PM.
Gerald
Also, remember that you can take the 13 tooth gear from your Load O Matic and use it on the new style distributor if you are careful in removing it and installing it on the new distributor (in case your motor is a Dearborn).
Remember that, in order to change the cam, you have to lift up the lifters in order to get the cam out, and that you can't just pull them out of the motor from the top, because the mushroom design won't allow that. If you drop one into the motor, you'll have to do what needs to be done to get it out from underneath.
Also, altho I'm sure that performance cams are available, I am also sure that they will be somewhat difficult to locate and expensive, compared to a Cleveland Y cam. I haven't looked -- maybe someone else has experience here.
You are dealing with 7.2:1 compression motor to begin with, and you are not going to be able to get a lot more power from the motor very easily without spending a lot of money. If you are going to spend a lot of money, starting with a 272/292 makes more sense.
Given the trouble and expense of finding a cam and changing it without tearing the motor down, I would suggest sticking with what's in there. Instead, consider trying to find the 1.5 ratio rockers or even buying a set of custom aluminum 1.6 ratio rockers. That will make the cam "act" bigger. You will always be able to use the rockers on another engine if you decide to build a different one in the future, too.
Whatever you do in the cam dept., make sure your springs are up to the challenge and don't coil-bind. I'm not too keen on the stock Ford retainers, either. If you go with a substantially different cam, the expenses will mount up quickly and you still won't get what you could have had with a larger engine.




