6.4L Power Stroke Diesel Engine fitted to 2008 - 2010 F250, F350 and F450 pickup trucks and F350 + Cab Chassis

7.3 vs 6.4 towing

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-08-2007, 01:30 AM
SuperDutyJ4500's Avatar
SuperDutyJ4500
SuperDutyJ4500 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Lafayette Louisiana
Posts: 628
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They wont do it, and I am so sorry for you. I smell something, but its not the troll..I think its something behind the troll.
 
  #17  
Old 06-08-2007, 09:44 AM
2005 Ford's Avatar
2005 Ford
2005 Ford is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 191
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Just an observation, it seems there is a lot of comparison between a chiped 7.3 and a stock 6.4. Shouldnt the comparisons be between the two motors in stock form? I used to drive a 2002 550 with a dump truck bed and a 7.3. It was a beast of a truck and im a fan of that motor, but we cant live in the past forever ya know. New isnt always better, but it isnt always bad either. I drove a 450 6.4 the other day and was impressed. It had more power then my 05 350 dually 6.0. All im sayimg is, lets give the 6.4 a chance 7.3 guys.
 
  #18  
Old 06-08-2007, 10:42 AM
XPC5's Avatar
XPC5
XPC5 is offline
New User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I went from '02 2WD 7.3 Excursion (edge tuned +80hp, 4" exhaust) to my current '08 F250 CC 4x4. Pulling a 20ft enclosed trailer loaded to around 6500lbs. Stock for stock, the 6.4 is stronger with and without a load. But with mods to the 7.3, this is what I felt.

The 7.3 with mods was a beast once locked in in OD. Hardly ever downshifted and would climb most mountains with the cruise at 72mph. The trans was never happy around town, slow shifts, lots of converter slip, not much power to the ground. 10-11mpg loaded cruising just over 70.

The 6.4 and torqshift combo is much better in town, always in a good gear to pull away strong from intersections, good power to the ground. Once up to cruise, the 6.4 is not making the torque in OD like the 7.3, so I get more downshifts on hills. The trans handles it smoothly, but mileage suffers. The taller 20" tires hurt the gearing, and the motor seems to make less torque below 2000rpm. Both trucks had 3.73 gears. I think the 6.4 with a 50hp tune or 4.10 gears would be perfect. 8-10mpg loaded.

I had hoped the 6.4 drivetrain would be perfect, but it needs justa bit more real world oomph. The rest of the truck, and the smoothness of the drivetrain, are night and day. That's a big deal if you spend many hours in the saddle. Many of our tows are 500-1000miles a day, so the comfort is worth it. The longer drivetrain warranty aslo makes me feel a bit better about the trans surviving.
 
  #19  
Old 06-08-2007, 01:49 PM
freekyFX4's Avatar
freekyFX4
freekyFX4 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 383
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by 2005 Ford
Just an observation, it seems there is a lot of comparison between a chiped 7.3 and a stock 6.4. Shouldnt the comparisons be between the two motors in stock form? I used to drive a 2002 550 with a dump truck bed and a 7.3. It was a beast of a truck and im a fan of that motor, but we cant live in the past forever ya know. New isnt always better, but it isnt always bad either. I drove a 450 6.4 the other day and was impressed. It had more power then my 05 350 dually 6.0. All im sayimg is, lets give the 6.4 a chance 7.3 guys.
I don't think that there are many people left on this board with a non-chipped 7.3, so the only way to compare would be for someone to return their 7.3 to stock, then compare them.
 
  #20  
Old 06-08-2007, 03:09 PM
firehawk198's Avatar
firehawk198
firehawk198 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Massachusetts
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Strut61
Blackhat, I understand, that is why I posted the information about the trucks......The man asked about a comparison between 7.3 and 6.4, above are my "Facts". However, If you can understand the differences in vehicles, you pointed out, someone may get some useful information. Like the mileage you'll expect to get towing 15-16k
Ya Strut & I have gone over all those differences. Strut had some real life experience and realizes the comparisons. We were all anxious to get the 450’s but not realizing how much the extra rpms would kill the mileage. Would be buyers need to really look at everything over all, read the posts and come to their own conclusions. At the last minute reading the posts I changed mine to 4.30’s after it had been ordered for two weeks. Looking back at it now I might have been better off with a 350drw with 4.10s so it would run 2000 rpms at 65. Running mty I get 16mpg at 60mph 1900 rpms and drops to 12mpg at 65mph at 2100rpms. Have only towed short distances so far. Historically my v10 with 3.73’s averaged 11.8 my 450 so far 11.7 Towing my V10 7.5 –8.5 and it had to tow its heart out. My advice to would be buyers: gearing is very important to what you are going to tow. Still really like my 450 and am proud to own it, have to drive it a little slower with the gearing. Just sits a little more that nice weather is here and I can drive my hawk. Apples to apples in my opinion I think a 6,000# 3.73 6.4 will get the same mileage as the 6,000# 3.73 6.0. Its when you go with lower gears and a 8700# 450 mileage will suffer. I did not get a 450 for mileage but for its towing capacity, even though we would like to, you can’t have both.

 
  #21  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:59 PM
kimminau2's Avatar
kimminau2
kimminau2 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by f450/2008
I traded my06 in on a 08 what a mistake very disappointed whit performance and fuel mileage my 06 was getting 31mpg empty 25 pulling a 18500 fifth wheel and tons of *****.the 08 has 10,000 miles on it now empty the best I can get is 4.5 miles the gallon im afraid to pull my fifth wheel with it........oh well back to the dealer I go on monday,going to try and have them pull 450 software off and put the 350 software on and if that wont work give back mty 06......
ROFLMAO!!! My boots are getting dirty after reading that post.
 
  #22  
Old 06-08-2007, 08:09 PM
f450/2008's Avatar
f450/2008
f450/2008 is offline
New User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by kimminau2
ROFLMAO!!! My boots are getting dirty after reading that post.
sorry about youur boots but the facts are the facts .....~
 
  #23  
Old 06-08-2007, 09:59 PM
kimminau2's Avatar
kimminau2
kimminau2 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Not hardly even worth the effort but what the hey...BS bubba!
 
  #24  
Old 06-08-2007, 10:51 PM
mcboudreaux's Avatar
mcboudreaux
mcboudreaux is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
when you say 31 mpg you do mean "meters per gallon" dont you?
 
  #25  
Old 06-08-2007, 11:31 PM
66stang351's Avatar
66stang351
66stang351 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The only way a superduty will ever get 31 mpg is going down hill. Probably wasn't worth the effort to type this message.
 
  #26  
Old 06-08-2007, 11:43 PM
fruth04's Avatar
fruth04
fruth04 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 278
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
lmao pretty well covers it.... there isnt a truck made in this country that weights 8500lbs and gets 30mpg.......... what i waste of finger movement to type this
 
  #27  
Old 06-09-2007, 06:09 AM
firehawk198's Avatar
firehawk198
firehawk198 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Central Massachusetts
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by f450/2008
sorry about youur boots but the facts are the facts .....~
Ha, He forgot to tell us this was when he was towing with his 6.0 on Mars and his new 450 on Jupiter. Now it makes sense to me Sure need a laugh like this once and a while, some of us are so serious with our posts.
 

Last edited by firehawk198; 06-09-2007 at 06:11 AM. Reason: add
  #28  
Old 06-09-2007, 07:26 AM
hanklin's Avatar
hanklin
hanklin is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Here in No. Calif
Posts: 12,737
Received 684 Likes on 397 Posts
Probly starts his day with green eggs and ham

Hanklin
 
  #29  
Old 06-09-2007, 10:19 PM
mikea4x4's Avatar
mikea4x4
mikea4x4 is offline
New User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Smile

At the last minute reading the posts I changed mine to 4.30’s after it had been ordered for two weeks. Looking back at it now I might have been better off with a 350drw with 4.10s so it would run 2000 rpms at 65. Running mty I get 16mpg at 60mph 1900 rpms and drops to 12mpg at 65mph at 2100rpms. Have only towed short distances so far. Historically my v10 with 3.73’s averaged 11.8 my 450 so far 11.7 Towing my V10 7.5 –8.5 and it had to tow its heart out. My advice to would be buyers: gearing is very important to what you are going to tow. Still really like my 450 and am proud to own it, have to drive it a little slower with the gearing. Just sits a little more that nice weather is here and I can drive my hawk. Apples to apples in my opinion I think a 6,000# 3.73 6.4 will get the same mileage as the 6,000# 3.73 6.0. Its when you go with lower gears and a 8700# 450 mileage will suffer. I did not get a 450 for mileage but for its towing capacity, even though we would like to, you can’t have both.

OK, my first post!!!...I currently have a F250 (7.5 460cc gas) 4.10 rear end. My whole premis of buying a new truck is for the increased MPG of a desiel.With my 460 when towing I get 6.8-7.8 mpg, empty it is 10-11.5 hiwy.
I liked the above post because it addresses one of the many questions I have.
We have a 29 foot 2007 Copper Canyon travel trailer est weight loaded is 8500-9000# conventional tow. I have been looking at the 2008 F250 Lariat 6.4L 4x4 with the stock 3.73 rear end. If I ordered it with the 4.10 rear end would the MPG increase when towing because the engine will have an easer time towing the trailer??? Or will the 4.10 gears still cut down on MPG's. All I want is 10 MPG when towing and 15 MPG when empty (or more!!!) but that would make me happy...thanks.

Dang!!! now i see the QUOTE button...sorry Firehawk
 

Last edited by mikea4x4; 06-09-2007 at 10:29 PM. Reason: dang, now I see the QUOTE button...sorry Firehawk
  #30  
Old 06-09-2007, 11:34 PM
66stang351's Avatar
66stang351
66stang351 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 516
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by mikea4x4
Originally Posted by Firehawk
At the last minute reading the posts I changed mine to 4.30’s after it had been ordered for two weeks. Looking back at it now I might have been better off with a 350drw with 4.10s so it would run 2000 rpms at 65. Running mty I get 16mpg at 60mph 1900 rpms and drops to 12mpg at 65mph at 2100rpms. Have only towed short distances so far. Historically my v10 with 3.73’s averaged 11.8 my 450 so far 11.7 Towing my V10 7.5 –8.5 and it had to tow its heart out. My advice to would be buyers: gearing is very important to what you are going to tow. Still really like my 450 and am proud to own it, have to drive it a little slower with the gearing. Just sits a little more that nice weather is here and I can drive my hawk. Apples to apples in my opinion I think a 6,000# 3.73 6.4 will get the same mileage as the 6,000# 3.73 6.0. Its when you go with lower gears and a 8700# 450 mileage will suffer. I did not get a 450 for mileage but for its towing capacity, even though we would like to, you can’t have both.
OK, my first post!!!...I currently have a F250 (7.5 460cc gas) 4.10 rear end. My whole premis of buying a new truck is for the increased MPG of a desiel.With my 460 when towing I get 6.8-7.8 mpg, empty it is 10-11.5 hiwy.
I liked the above post because it addresses one of the many questions I have.
We have a 29 foot 2007 Copper Canyon travel trailer est weight loaded is 8500-9000# conventional tow. I have been looking at the 2008 F250 Lariat 6.4L 4x4 with the stock 3.73 rear end. If I ordered it with the 4.10 rear end would the MPG increase when towing because the engine will have an easer time towing the trailer??? Or will the 4.10 gears still cut down on MPG's. All I want is 10 MPG when towing and 15 MPG when empty (or more!!!) but that would make me happy...thanks.

Dang!!! now i see the QUOTE button...sorry Firehawk
I don't think the 4.10s will do you any good in your situation. I opted for 3.73s on my truck pulling a 13,000 pound 5th wheel. I get 9 mpg pulling with the 6.4 and don't feel that I would get any significant increase while towing if I had the 4.10s. BTW, I get 14-16 empty.
 


Quick Reply: 7.3 vs 6.4 towing



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:15 PM.