When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Head flow, valve size, manifold differences, camming differences, etc. Like I said, all other things being equal. With two different motor families, things are never equal. Which of course, negates both of our examples.
I modeled both motors (428 and 429) in desktop dyno with equal parts (in theory, unbuildable of course) and the curves are nearly identical, with the slight advantage to the 429, by 4 hp and 1 ft-lb of torque.
It's displacement. Stroker cranks just give you more. Nothing magical about the "leverage" or anything like that.
yes its the same as a 390,
I got my 428 out of a thunderbird, It was a really cool car untill it got crashed.
Good luck real 428's are hard to find. And there is nothing wrong with a 390!
It's displacement. Stroker cranks just give you more. Nothing magical about the "leverage" or anything like that.
Hot Rod magazine did a test a couple years ago to settle the debate as to whether a longer stroke makes more torque than a larger bore/shorter stroke. IIRC the engines were within 2 ci of each other. They found that the horsepower and torque were almost exactly the same. Long story short, the old saying, "there's no replacement for cubic displacement" still holds true.
Look at the torque numbers of Olds and Chrysler motors in the 60's with big bores short strokes, high numbers at fairly low rpm's but they had high compression and good fuel back then. Today we have to make torque with crappy fuel.
Anytime someone mentions a 4x4 that's heavy, operates at low rpm's for off road or a truck loaded for towing I recommend a 410 or 428 build with the proper cam and equipment.
If there's such a thing as having too much torque let me know plus use less throttle.
i just discovered a 68 cougar a couple miles from my house for sale with an old 8n tractor , what are the odds it has a 428. i am going to see if i can catch the owner at home tomorrow!
look for a fairlane wagon, I got mine out of a crashed thunderbird.
Also (hind site for me) check with your local machine shop. The one by me in Everett WA. has two 428's with cranks and rods sitting on the shop floor. Ready to re-build. Lots of people have big dreams and no $$ to pay the machinest when there block/crank are done. Also Craigs-list has a lot of stuff on it. Or just pony up and get an aftermarket block/crank/rods/heads!!
Look at the torque numbers of Olds and Chrysler motors in the 60's with big bores short strokes, high numbers at fairly low rpm's but they had high compression and good fuel back then. Today we have to make torque with crappy fuel.
Anytime someone mentions a 4x4 that's heavy, operates at low rpm's for off road or a truck loaded for towing I recommend a 410 or 428 build with the proper cam and equipment.
If there's such a thing as having too much torque let me know plus use less throttle.
Hope you weren't thinking about the 455 Olds here. Nothing short about it's stroke (4.125") But at nearly 500 ft lbs for the lowly 2 bbl 455 ( that tiny Rochester carb looked so out of place there) it was a torque monster. My Moms 70 Delta 88 4 dr hardtop would smoke em on demand.
Why would you want to? The 352/360 rods are visibly weaker. Just compare the two side by side, you'lll see what I mean. The miniscule difference in length isn't enough to justify that over the strength loss.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.