Notices

BioDiesel Titration Instructions for Newbies

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 02:36 PM
  #16  
Murphy2000's Avatar
Murphy2000
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kmccune
It was the cone on the bottom that I was interested in. I guess I've seen them if they are from US Plastics.
Oh! I made the cones for the 55 gallon drum myself.

It takes a couple hours but I invented a little tool to make bending the cone easy. It cost me about $10 to build a small bender for it.


I have information on my website but am not allowed to post it here. Apparently the advertisers and webmaster of this site get a bit upset when anyone posts a link to outside products.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 09:52 PM
  #17  
kennedyford's Avatar
kennedyford
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 3
From: Chattanooga
Originally Posted by Murphy2000
Your forumula is the same. 3lbs of catalyst in a 25 gallon batch may not be enough.
3lbs of catalyst is 1360 Grams
25 Gallon is 94 Liters

Using commonly accepted forumulas requiring 7 grams of KOH (adjusted for poplular purity of 90%) you need 7.8 grams per liter of oil. (rounded out to 8grams)

So, an average titration falls between 3 and 15. Much of mine is around 8 or 10.

So, with 8 titration + 8 Base i need 16 grams per liter of catalyst to just BARELY scrape into ASMT standards.

You are using 12 or 13.. You are 3 or 4 grams per liter short.

Bad fuel.
FIRST OFF IT IS ASTM STANDARDS. Which test did you have it sent in for?

The D6751 standard covers the use of biodiesel as a blend component to be mixed with petroleum diesel in typical blend ratios ranging from 2 volume percent up to 20 volume percent.

OR
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=460 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width=460 colSpan=2>CURRENT ASTM D 975 </TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=60></TD><TD vAlign=top>ASTM specifications are living documents; they are continually being reviewed and updated as new performance information is acquired, as use requirements change, or as new analytical techniques are developed. Diesel fuel properties currently under review by the specification committee include cetane number, cetane index, low temperature operability, stability, lubricity, and detergency. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

WHICH PART DID YOUR BIO BARELY PASS WITH?

I've never had my oil titrate at more than 4, much of it titrates at 3, so using YOUR own figures; Base rate of 7.2 gms KOH + 4 = 11.2 gms/ltr. X 95 ltrs = 1235 gms per batch. I'm using 1344 gms, so I'm OVER!!

RECOMENDATIONS CAUSE PROVOCATIONS FROM YOU. Your not going to believe anything I type anyway. You titrate and I dont.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #18  
kennedyford's Avatar
kennedyford
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 3
From: Chattanooga
Originally Posted by Murphy2000

I have information on my website but am not allowed to post it here. Apparently the advertisers and webmaster of this site get a bit upset when anyone posts a link to outside products.
Its because your lining your own pockets with your site. Every design and suggestion is free on this site helping each other out. If you want to advertise, PAY FOR IT.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 12:00 AM
  #19  
Murphy2000's Avatar
Murphy2000
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kennedyford
FIRST OFF IT IS ASTM STANDARDS. Which test did you have it sent in for?

The D6751 standard covers the use of biodiesel as a blend component to be mixed with petroleum diesel in typical blend ratios ranging from 2 volume percent up to 20 volume percent.

OR
<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=460 border=0><TBODY><TR><TD vAlign=top width=460 colSpan=2>CURRENT ASTM D 975 </TD></TR><TR><TD vAlign=top width=60></TD><TD vAlign=top>ASTM specifications are living documents; they are continually being reviewed and updated as new performance information is acquired, as use requirements change, or as new analytical techniques are developed. Diesel fuel properties currently under review by the specification committee include cetane number, cetane index, low temperature operability, stability, lubricity, and detergency. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

WHICH PART DID YOUR BIO BARELY PASS WITH?

I've never had my oil titrate at more than 4, much of it titrates at 3, so using YOUR own figures; Base rate of 7.2 gms KOH + 4 = 11.2 gms/ltr. X 95 ltrs = 1235 gms per batch. I'm using 1344 gms, so I'm OVER!!

RECOMENDATIONS CAUSE PROVOCATIONS FROM YOU. Your not going to believe anything I type anyway. You titrate and I dont.

Not only are your facts and figures wrong, but you are acting incapable of even quoting something in writting correctly.

In addition you EVEN CHANGED COLORS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE READS YOUR MIS-INFORMATION CAMPAIGN.

IT IS SAD THAT YOU REFUSE TO HOLD YOUR SIDE IN A TWO WAY DEBATE AND HAVE REVERTED TO TACTICS SUCH AS THIS.

This makes a good debate or arguement impossible.

Are school system is trashed.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 12:12 AM
  #20  
Murphy2000's Avatar
Murphy2000
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kennedyford
Its because your lining your own pockets with your site. Every design and suggestion is free on this site helping each other out. If you want to advertise, PAY FOR IT.
Now that's a valid point.

But lets view it from a few different angles.

I'm not here to advertise. I'm here to help. My advice to get people into making biodiesel successfuly is always free, and more importantly, plentiful.

There is a thick gray area between helping an advertising. That's just the way it is. This site is not mine and I don't make the rules here.. so, I try to stay on the side of that gray line that is favorable to the website owner.

Someone could say, (and have every right too) "Dont even come close to that gray line"..

But, that would totally defeat the purpose of helping people because when you do that, only the paying customers get to post information.. When that information is wrong, and could potentially cause damage , the situation should be fixed.

Everyone has a right to put dinner on the table... but not at the expense of someone else's.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 08:12 AM
  #21  
kennedyford's Avatar
kennedyford
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 3
From: Chattanooga
Originally Posted by Murphy2000
Not only are your facts and figures wrong, but you are acting incapable of even quoting something in writting correctly.

In addition you EVEN CHANGED COLORS TO MAKE SURE EVERYONE READS YOUR MIS-INFORMATION CAMPAIGN.

IT IS SAD THAT YOU REFUSE TO HOLD YOUR SIDE IN A TWO WAY DEBATE AND HAVE REVERTED TO TACTICS SUCH AS THIS.

This makes a good debate or arguement impossible.

Are school system is trashed.
Number 1. Identify the mis-information

You website referal.
www.biodiesel.org/resources/<WBR>fuelfactsheets/standards_and_warranties.shtm

www.chevron.com/products/prodserv/<WBR>fuels/bulletin/diesel/L2_5_3_rf.htm

http://tdiclub.com/articles/Diesel_Fuel_Guidlines/

I have no campain, im not selling, politcal, or posting how to's. I have not reverted to insults. I have made my own grammatical errors just like you. "Are school system is trashed" Do you mean Our, or is it a question? Since you probably are not talking about high school anymore, college is not taught nor mandated by the feds or state education board. In meaning, any wrong minded individual could have a degree and teach his or her platform.

To address color changes, its easier on the eyes. Do you perfer numbers and bullets as I systematically argue your every point? Thats what makes it a debate.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:12 PM
  #22  
CheaperJeeper's Avatar
CheaperJeeper
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
From: Kent WA
If the slam-fest ever dies down in this thread I have a related and pertinent question.....

First let me say that I understand the purpose behind titration - if your oil is of inconsistent quality or varying acidity (i.e. percentage of FFAs per volume of oil). I can also see where if your oil is VERY consistent it would become an unnecessary step that could be eliminated.

However, here's what I don't understand. If you're trying to determine acidity, why not buy one of the relatively inexpensive electronic PH meters that are so readily available on the market?

I'm sure the equipment and supplies for titration are cheaper, but the process seems overly complicated, subjective, and error-prone. The meter seems like a more consistently accurate option to me.

Or is there some reason that their system of measurement for acidity/alkalinity isn't appropriate for this particular application?
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2007 | 11:20 PM
  #23  
kennedyford's Avatar
kennedyford
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 3
From: Chattanooga
No, it is appropriate. I think lithmus paper or your pool ph test or the electronic version will work just fine on your final product. Its all about what and how You want to go about it. The new guys and affordability for them are constant factors. We want them to succeed in every way with the least chance of failure and aggrivation as possible. I am unsure on the specifics of the electronic device or even if they do work. I dont know anyone using them. You want to contact Fabmandelux on that.
 

Last edited by kennedyford; Mar 23, 2007 at 11:23 PM. Reason: idea
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-3

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-5

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-9

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 11:09 AM
  #24  
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 26,337
Likes: 12
From: Paradise Found!
Originally Posted by CheaperJeeper
If the slam-fest ever dies down in this thread I have a related and pertinent question.....

First let me say that I understand the purpose behind titration - if your oil is of inconsistent quality or varying acidity (i.e. percentage of FFAs per volume of oil). I can also see where if your oil is VERY consistent it would become an unnecessary step that could be eliminated.

However, here's what I don't understand. If you're trying to determine acidity, why not buy one of the relatively inexpensive electronic PH meters that are so readily available on the market?

I'm sure the equipment and supplies for titration are cheaper, but the process seems overly complicated, subjective, and error-prone. The meter seems like a more consistently accurate option to me.

Or is there some reason that their system of measurement for acidity/alkalinity isn't appropriate for this particular application?

My infeed oil never gets much above 3, and I blend all the oil from 26 restaurants into one tank. so I haven't titrated in over 3 years, a totally unnecessary step in my operation.

Most PH meters don't last in the biodiesel operation, don't know why......but most people I've talked with that tried them said they didn't last long.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #25  
Murphy2000's Avatar
Murphy2000
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by CheaperJeeper
If the slam-fest ever dies down in this thread I have a related and pertinent question.....

First let me say that I understand the purpose behind titration - if your oil is of inconsistent quality or varying acidity (i.e. percentage of FFAs per volume of oil). I can also see where if your oil is VERY consistent it would become an unnecessary step that could be eliminated.

However, here's what I don't understand. If you're trying to determine acidity, why not buy one of the relatively inexpensive electronic PH meters that are so readily available on the market?

I'm sure the equipment and supplies for titration are cheaper, but the process seems overly complicated, subjective, and error-prone. The meter seems like a more consistently accurate option to me.

Or is there some reason that their system of measurement for acidity/alkalinity isn't appropriate for this particular application?
Actually, the process of doing a proper titration is very simple.. Takes about 30 to 60 seconds to complete and is very accurate.

Electronic pH meters don't work with oil because of the way the sensor reads the fluid. Most pH meters are designed to read the pH in water or water like conditions. Oil is much different.

pH strips are not near as accurate as a proper titration.

While reading this forum, you have to realize that the most of the folks in here have seemed to follow one guy (FabMan). He has gathered a following and those who follow have no clue what they are talking about. They have taken to following FabMan's technique and defend it religiously. Like the folks from Waco Texas.

In order to peform a proper transesterfication on used oil, you MUST perform a titration. You can not properly change something without knowing what its made of and assumptions are the "Mother of all f#@$ups".

This place is like a biodiesel cult.. The folks here who are following fabman are the ONLY ones that I know of on the internet who do it this way. Avoiding the debate regarding if it works or not, the fact is, people in-the-know and those who run million gallon per year plants do perform a titration.

If you don't want to destroy your engine, the best way to make biodiesel is the scientific way as the large commerical producers who make millions of gallons do it.

Everytime you hear of someone destroying their engine on biodiesel, it is almost always somoene who followed a cult recepie that is isolated to one or two websites or manufacturers.

That's why I started participating here.. Trying to slowely straighten people out with accurate information.

Check out the single biggest and busiest biodiesel dedicated forum on the internet. www.biodiesel.infopop.cc its free and there is no advertising.. no advertising means posters are free to say what they want without fear of being banned or deleted for pissing off a supporting advertiser.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 06:50 PM
  #26  
kennedyford's Avatar
kennedyford
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 3
From: Chattanooga
Alright alright alright already

Ok lets scientifically debate this. Knock off the name calling and such. So I will just ask questions and you give the answer of why.

I understand tritration. I understand you advocate it. Ok

Question 1.
Do you prefer Naoh or Koh?

Question 2.
Do you prefer methanol or ethanol with use of the catalyst?

Question 3.
If one does not use the "appleseed" (waterheater), is not a tank with a heating element equivalent?

Question 4.
If you answer like this, Koh, methanol, tank equivalent what really is the difference between you and Fab?

Question 5.
What form of methanol or ethanol recovery do you advocate for those trying to recoup their costs?

These are not loaded questions. Once again you advocate tritration after ever batch. Ok fine thats for you and those who like to follow those means. I have not seen Fab jump all over new guys to tell them how to process. So I am just asking you to clarify your position, not send us to another site. Thank you.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #27  
Murphy2000's Avatar
Murphy2000
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kennedyford
Ok lets scientifically debate this. Knock off the name calling and such. So I will just ask questions and you give the answer of why.

I understand tritration. I understand you advocate it. Ok

Question 1.
Do you prefer Naoh or Koh?

Question 2.
Do you prefer methanol or ethanol with use of the catalyst?

Question 3.
If one does not use the "appleseed" (waterheater), is not a tank with a heating element equivalent?

Question 4.
If you answer like this, Koh, methanol, tank equivalent what really is the difference between you and Fab?

Question 5.
What form of methanol or ethanol recovery do you advocate for those trying to recoup their costs?

These are not loaded questions. Once again you advocate tritration after ever batch. Ok fine thats for you and those who like to follow those means. I have not seen Fab jump all over new guys to tell them how to process. So I am just asking you to clarify your position, not send us to another site. Thank you.
1. KOH
2. Methanol (But if the same results could be achieved using ethanol, I would switch in a nano-second and be making my own)
3. No not really. All tanks are equal if you have a big enough pump. A very general statement would be 1 HP for every 50 Gallons of batch size. (very general statement)
4. I titrate my oil. Titration is required to make proper biodiesel.

As for methanol recovery, if you run 30 or 40 gallons a week, meth recovery is a waste of time. If you are running monster processors like FabMans, methanol recovery is almost mandatory or you might not get out of the financial red zone.
Either way, to recover methanol properly, you need a reflux still or you wont achieve a purity high enough to use. I see many people practicing dilution methods by mixing good meth with recovered meth. All this does is add water to your next reaction and lower the quality of the fuel from the next batch. If your meth isnt pure, you shouldnt use it.

I don't have anything against fabman or his process. Everyone's process must be suited to that persons situation.. Yes! There is the magic sentance.

Water washing is no better or worse than Magnesol or any other technique. It is just another way of post-processing raw biodiesel. This forum seems to push anyone and everyone to wash with magnasol, regardless of thier independant situation or circumstance. Most times, people don't even bother to ask. Its as if the attitude is "Dry wash or your fuel is crap". "Do it our way because its better".

It should be made perfectly clear that the method each person uses to post-process their fuel should be almost completely dependant upon that persons situation. ASTM standards can be acheived by almost all the techniques.

If you live in the wide open country on acre(s) of land with a great water supply, you have no business dry washing.. It just uses up more resources that are not required and more cost.
But if you live in a very dry place with water shortages, magnasol might be a great alternative! The point is, it depends on each persons circumstances.

On the subject of FabMans biodiesel receipies.. as I understand it, he doesnt titrate.. Or did I miss something? It is a HUGE mistake to follow this advice unless you get your oil from the same place as him. His oil may stay very stable on acid value and maybe he doesnt need to titrate.. But that situation would not remain true anywhere else and I can tell you acid values do fluctuate.
I collect from about 150 restaurants and I can tell you for a fact that during every holiday, the acid value in the oil goes up between 20% and 100%.. Why? Because the restaurant gets more customers on a holiday but the cook still only changes the oil on the regular schedule.


There are 3 sure signs to instantly indicate when someone involved in biodiesel doesnt know what they are doing.
1. Use of a plastic reactor tank.
2. Lack of titration
3. Lack of sufficient catalyst


Do you perform quality checks on your fuel on a batch by batch basis?

I am glad you and I can strike up a civilized conversation.. Bantering is fun but doesnt get us anywhere. And no, I don't take any of it personally.
 
Reply
Old Mar 24, 2007 | 11:01 PM
  #28  
kennedyford's Avatar
kennedyford
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 1,567
Likes: 3
From: Chattanooga
Ok so you and I have made some mistakes on different levels. How about we approach this a lil differently. First I know Fab uses magnesol for a reason, although I have only read suggestions and questions he has not pushed that procedure on anyone since Ive been on this forum. I believe you would retract your cultish statement on the following. I specifically know my wvo from the facitlities I contract from and holiday doesnt apply. So tritration is not ness for me. I have specific equipment that fab does not use but I will and do. Therefore, the only in commons are the chemicals and the general formula changed for the specific regions or resturants. If you post a step by step way in laymens terms without referal to other sites it would be helpful. Your plant and fabs have similiar characteristic specific to your region or our talants in fabrication. Im in AZ and my specifics are different then both yours. Agree?
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2007 | 12:35 AM
  #29  
Murphy2000's Avatar
Murphy2000
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
I just can not imagine how you could make biodiesel properly without titrating..

Even a steady restaurant fluxuates by 1 point or so.

So lets say you are one in 100,000 that gets some source of super steady oil where the acid value never changes.. (Hey, I had a source like that for a short time.. Potato chip factory! using cottonseed oil) it was dang good stuff and titrated at 4.0 to 4.2 every time..

But to suggest dumping in 3lbs of catalyist with 25 gallons of oil is way off base.. (Pun intended! )

Come on.. you have to admint your biodiesel making is somewhat of a crap-shoot.. If you don't titrate waste vegetable oil, you are guessing.

Ok.. its your system, your truck and your money.

But please, PLEASE keep that to yourself. All newbies have to learn the same way.. Telling somone to just dump in a a specific amount of catalyst without knowing if they have even titrated is incorrect procedure to say the least.

You know, we may disagree on some things but we are both saving dollars, bullets and temperature for every gallon we burn.

I just don't want people to ruin thier engine because they got bad instructions. It gives biodiesel a bad name no matter why they screwed up or who's fault it was.

I'll say it again, not titrating is a very bad way to go... its like going for a drive at night with your sunglasses on..
 
Reply
Old Mar 25, 2007 | 12:39 AM
  #30  
Murphy2000's Avatar
Murphy2000
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Oops.. almost forgot..

I am working on step by step instructions for all phases of the biodiesel process.

Titration instructions are posted for all to see on my website. They are not in a format that lends them to being posted on a forum like this.

The reason people like my do-it-yourself construction plans so much is because of the format I present the information in.. They are very detailed with lots of pictures. People love pictures..

Hey, one more thing.. you didnt answer my question...

What quality procedures do you perform on your fuel to make sure each batch is good?
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:24 PM.

story-0
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-30 18:33:59


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-2
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-4
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-5
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-6
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-8
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE