3" dual exhaust-??
#1
3" dual exhaust-??
Hi, I'm thinking seriously about putting headers and 3" true dual exhaust in my 1967 F-100, 352 vin code Y, 2V carb. I would rather find out if theres anything wrong with that before i put any money into the truck. for example, i'm not gonna do any damage to my engine with the exhaust system? i've been told that i might burn my valves too.... need some good helpful advice.....
#2
A 3" system is probably a bit large for a 352, IMO a 2 1/4" or 2 1/2" system would be more then adequate for the truck. A 3" system would not hurt the engine at all, with mufflers it will certainly create enough back pressure. With headers and a new exhaust system when you have completed the installation it would be a good plan to screw in a new set of Motorcraft plugs and get a good accurate plug reading after some miles to see if the engine is burning correctly.... Or, any good shop will have an eshaust air/fuel ratio analyzer that will tell you whether your engine is running rich or lean....
#3
#4
A 2V Carb is 480-500 cfm at the max .
Engines req' some back PSI or reversion occurs.It canl kill low end response & general performance . Most likely it will also affect your engines efficiency in a negative way across the board.
2.25" Dia is too big on a Box Stock 352 or similar 5.7L engine. 2" seems more realistic with an "H" or "X" crossover included ahead of the Mufflers in the exhaust down pipes off the headers or CI Exh manifolds. What I'm saying is BIGGER isn't better necessarily, when it comes to exhaust, tuned is better.
This is just my opinion of course but my 460 is only running 2.25" dia per side. It works great.
FBp
Engines req' some back PSI or reversion occurs.It canl kill low end response & general performance . Most likely it will also affect your engines efficiency in a negative way across the board.
2.25" Dia is too big on a Box Stock 352 or similar 5.7L engine. 2" seems more realistic with an "H" or "X" crossover included ahead of the Mufflers in the exhaust down pipes off the headers or CI Exh manifolds. What I'm saying is BIGGER isn't better necessarily, when it comes to exhaust, tuned is better.
This is just my opinion of course but my 460 is only running 2.25" dia per side. It works great.
FBp
Last edited by FordBoypete; 03-14-2007 at 01:43 PM.
#6
#7
Trending Topics
#8
Yeah, what Pete and Haaser said 2 1/4" or 2 1/2" should be fine. I've run a few 390's, one with aluminum heads and a roller cam, and never went bigger the 2 1/2". The X or H pipe is also an excellent addition to the system. FE's are torque monster engines, 3" pipes IMO would just scrub off some of the torque you spent all the money trying to produce!!!!
#9
#11
motoxtj
I'd say maybe 2.50" dia with baffled mufflers or 2.25" with low res mufflers & 2.00 with flow throughs like glass pack thrush or whatever. But it will be sluggish with the 2.25 & 2.50 Dia system until you do apply the speed parts, I believe.
You gotta realize adding speed parts, unless they are a stroker crank & bigger pistons will not affect CFM your 352 CID will move, it can't move more than 352 cubic inches per revolution. I don't believe 352 has enough flow to warrant a 2.50" exhaust system & definitely not 3.00" Dia system.
FBp
I'd say maybe 2.50" dia with baffled mufflers or 2.25" with low res mufflers & 2.00 with flow throughs like glass pack thrush or whatever. But it will be sluggish with the 2.25 & 2.50 Dia system until you do apply the speed parts, I believe.
You gotta realize adding speed parts, unless they are a stroker crank & bigger pistons will not affect CFM your 352 CID will move, it can't move more than 352 cubic inches per revolution. I don't believe 352 has enough flow to warrant a 2.50" exhaust system & definitely not 3.00" Dia system.
FBp
#12
#13
#15