Waste streams question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-09-2007, 08:50 AM
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux
fabmandelux is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise Found!
Posts: 26,337
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by CheaperJeeper
OK, so my education continues. Magnesol, according to the manufacturer is synthetic magnesium silicate. So it is a magnesium compound. Essentially magnesium chemically combined with sand.

I also now understand that amost all of the methanol is cooked out of the glycerine as well as out of the bio. The glycerine is the base material for making soap.

HOWEVER, methanol is so poisonous that even trace amounts of it are harmful if injested or absorbed through the skin. So I don't understand how soap and magnesium sand can be safely fed to livestock - especially if they contain even the slightest traces of methanol and/or lye. I'm hoping Fabman can answer that one for me 'cause right now it doesn't seem to make sense to me.

Right now, the concerns over the wastes are really the only thing standing in the way of my moving forward with setting up my own bio processor.

One other question. Is there any alternative to using methanol? Any other less-hazardous, kind of alcohol that can be substituted for the methanol?

Send me a PM with your regular email add, and I'll send you the study on feeding glycerol to cattle. IF you recover the methanol from the biodiesel before you use Magnesol, the amount of methanol that remains in the Magnesol is only a couple of parts per MILLION, same with the glycerol.

The key is to be able to do a good job of recovering all the methanol. Methanol is very unstable, and will decompose rapidly in the presence of oxygen. We have fed the glycerol to our cattle and they will MOB you if they see the pail of glycerol because it is very sweet!

As for the soap, if you remove the methanol FIRST, before using Magnesol, the soap is filtered out. About the only thing left are FFAs, very small amounts of Lye, water, and trace amounts of methanol.

The only sample of glycerol I've had tested showed 20 parts per BILLION of methanol.
 
  #17  
Old 01-09-2007, 09:47 AM
Phydeaux88's Avatar
Phydeaux88
Phydeaux88 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Texas Coast
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Glycerol is a suger alchol and is used as an additive in many foods.
When used as a food additive it must be very pure, few contaminants allowed, but it is FDA approved


Edit addition:

It is also the main ingredient in KY Jelly and other "personal" lubricants.
 

Last edited by Phydeaux88; 01-09-2007 at 10:25 AM.
  #18  
Old 01-09-2007, 09:56 AM
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux
fabmandelux is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise Found!
Posts: 26,337
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Phydeaux88
Glycerol is a suger alchol and is used as an additive in many foods.
When used as a food additive it must be very pure, few contaminants allowed, but it is FDA approved

Congrats Phydeaux! One more post and your a "posting Guru"

P.S. Beers on you
 
  #19  
Old 01-09-2007, 07:45 PM
Phydeaux88's Avatar
Phydeaux88
Phydeaux88 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Texas Coast
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fabmandelux
Congrats Phydeaux! One more post and your a "posting Guru"

Hooray !!!!! Yipee !!!!! Yeeehaaa !!!!Finally made it !!!!!

Thanks for the heads up Fab I hadn't really been paying attention.
BTW I notice you are closing in on the update yourself.

With this post I cross a threshold on my way to posting superstardom


Everyone is invited to my house for free beer tonight
Jusr turn right at the Exxon station go 3 blocks and turn right again I will leave the light on.
 

Last edited by Phydeaux88; 01-09-2007 at 08:04 PM.
  #20  
Old 01-09-2007, 08:35 PM
CheaperJeeper's Avatar
CheaperJeeper
CheaperJeeper is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fabmandelux
Send me a PM with your regular email add, and I'll send you the study on feeding glycerol to cattle. IF you recover the methanol from the biodiesel before you use Magnesol, the amount of methanol that remains in the Magnesol is only a couple of parts per MILLION, same with the glycerol.

The key is to be able to do a good job of recovering all the methanol. Methanol is very unstable, and will decompose rapidly in the presence of oxygen. We have fed the glycerol to our cattle and they will MOB you if they see the pail of glycerol because it is very sweet!

As for the soap, if you remove the methanol FIRST, before using Magnesol, the soap is filtered out. About the only thing left are FFAs, very small amounts of Lye, water, and trace amounts of methanol.

The only sample of glycerol I've had tested showed 20 parts per BILLION of methanol.
Ummm, I thought glycerol WAS the soap?!? When you say "if you remove the methanol first, before using magnesol, the soap is filtered out", from that and looking at your diagram I take it you mean that after removing the methanol you can run the bio through a filter to remove the soap? Is it in particles or chunks big enough to filter out, or do you have to use some special kind of filter specifically for soap residues? From looking at your diagram, the recovery of the methanol accomplished simply by applying heat to boil it off (and re-condense and capture it into your tank), correct?

What are FFAs? You've clearly defined the trace amounts of methanol - obviously low enough to be ignored, but how small is "very small amounts of lye..."?

You all are giving me quite an education in the finer points of bio production and I want to say thank you for sharing your knowledge.

I'll PM you my addy for the glycerol-as-feed-study info, Fabman. Do you have any similar info about using magnesol as feed?

Phydeaux88, how pure is "pure enough" for ethanol to be used in the process? Does it have to be water-free too (199+ proof)? Or just free of other contaminants? I kinda like the idea of using ethanol if a reasonably priced supply can be found. Its lower toxicity makes me feel a lot better about using it if it is a viable alternative....
 

Last edited by CheaperJeeper; 01-09-2007 at 08:41 PM.
  #21  
Old 01-09-2007, 11:10 PM
newr's Avatar
newr
newr is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Tillamook, Or.
Posts: 294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Question Open Processor, Right?

As I read through this thread I'm sure that the discussion is based on an "Open" processor, as opposed to the "Apple Seed" style, yes?
 
  #22  
Old 01-10-2007, 06:14 AM
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux
fabmandelux is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise Found!
Posts: 26,337
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by CheaperJeeper
Ummm, I thought glycerol WAS the soap?!? When you say "if you remove the methanol first, before using magnesol, the soap is filtered out", from that and looking at your diagram I take it you mean that after removing the methanol you can run the bio through a filter to remove the soap? Is it in particles or chunks big enough to filter out, or do you have to use some special kind of filter specifically for soap residues? From looking at your diagram, the recovery of the methanol accomplished simply by applying heat to boil it off (and re-condense and capture it into your tank), correct?

What are FFAs? You've clearly defined the trace amounts of methanol - obviously low enough to be ignored, but how small is "very small amounts of lye..."?

You all are giving me quite an education in the finer points of bio production and I want to say thank you for sharing your knowledge.

I'll PM you my addy for the glycerol-as-feed-study info, Fabman. Do you have any similar info about using magnesol as feed?

Phydeaux88, how pure is "pure enough" for ethanol to be used in the process? Does it have to be water-free too (199+ proof)? Or just free of other contaminants? I kinda like the idea of using ethanol if a reasonably priced supply can be found. Its lower toxicity makes me feel a lot better about using it if it is a viable alternative....
Soap is formed as a side reaction from water reacting with Lye. If you recover the methanol FIRST, the soap WILL NOT STAY SUSPENDED in the bio. The soap comes out of suspension as a "slime" [kinda like "snot"!] and is easily filtered out. I use a simple bag filter, which can be washed and reused.

I use heat AND vacuum to recover the methanol, but have developed a new process that is much faster, and requires less energy input. I will be posting it shortly, as soon as I receive the conformation back from the patent office on the receipt of my application.

FFAs are Free Fatty Acids, which are mono, di, or triglycerides that have had there glycerol molecule "broken-off" because of excess heat in the cooking cycle. A PH test will tell how "base" the glycerol is and a simple acid [like vinegar] can be added to bring it to a neutral PH.

My contact at the Dallas Group [the people who make Magnesol] says the studies they are doing on feeding the magnesol are not complete, BUT there have been no adverse side affects yet.

In order to use ethanol in the reaction it must be very pure, 99.5 percent or better. Distillation will not make it pure enough. After distillation it must be forced through a "molecular sieve" to reach a purity suitable for use in the biodiesel reaction. Cost of commercial ethanol is above $4.00 a gallon if you could get the permits to buy it. Not very cost effective.
 
  #23  
Old 01-10-2007, 06:15 AM
fabmandelux's Avatar
fabmandelux
fabmandelux is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Paradise Found!
Posts: 26,337
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by newr
As I read through this thread I'm sure that the discussion is based on an "Open" processor, as opposed to the "Apple Seed" style, yes?
Yes, we are talking about my "open" style processor.
 
  #24  
Old 01-10-2007, 10:41 AM
CheaperJeeper's Avatar
CheaperJeeper
CheaperJeeper is offline
Posting Guru
Thread Starter
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kent WA
Posts: 2,175
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by fabmandelux
Yes, we are talking about my "open" style processor.
...but all the same info applies to bio produced in an appleseed too - doesn't it?

OK, well, you've answered all my questions (at least all I can think of right now) Fabman, and I thank you for it.

Kinda sux that ethanol is so spendy and hard to get. Guess that's why everyone doesn't use it, huh?

At this point sounds like the ball is in my court - just gotta' get off my duff and get started building a system, buying supplies, and collecting oil....
 
  #25  
Old 01-10-2007, 01:05 PM
Pele's Avatar
Pele
Pele is offline
Laughing Gas
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,003
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by fabmandelux
I use heat AND vacuum to recover the methanol.
Will the internals of a "York" type Air Conditioning compressor or any commonly available A/C service vacuum pump stand up to the methanol? Isn't it corrosive?
 
  #26  
Old 01-10-2007, 03:06 PM
Phydeaux88's Avatar
Phydeaux88
Phydeaux88 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: South Texas Coast
Posts: 1,570
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by CheaperJeeper
Ummm, I thought glycerol WAS the soap?!?
Soap is an emulsion of water and Free Fatty Acids (FFAs)
Animal and Vegetable oils are made of Fatty Acids bound to a Glycerin backbone so the traditional soap making process uses this readily available raw material as a source of FFAs. Lye is introduced to break the bonds that connect the fatty acids to their glycerin backbone yeilding glycerol and FFAs.
Then water is added and the mixture is whipped to form the emulsion.
There is glycerol present in soap but it is an insignificant contaminant, although it actually provide some fringe benefits.
The residual lye probably is partly responsible for the cleansing nature of soap.

Removing methanol from your processed BD helps the soap come out of suspension so it can be filtered out.

Originally Posted by CheaperJeeper
What are FFAs?
FFAs are Free Fatty Acids, approximate chemical formula CH3 ((CH2)10-15)COOH. They are the part of VO that is re-esterized to form BD, Chemical Formula approx CH3((CH2)10-15)COOCH3. In BD unesterized FFAs are a pesky contaminant because the can mix with any water present to form soaps that will plug filters. Also they are somewhat acidic so the can attack metal fuel system components.

Originally Posted by CheaperJeeper
Phydeaux88, how pure is "pure enough" for ethanol to be used in the process? Does it have to be water-free too (199+ proof)? Or just free of other contaminants? I kinda like the idea of using ethanol if a reasonably priced supply can be found. Its lower toxicity makes me feel a lot better about using it if it is a viable alternative....
I am not really sure, I think Fab knows the answer. I do remember seeing somthing about 98% pure but cannot remember where so I cant swear to it.
 

Last edited by Phydeaux88; 01-10-2007 at 03:20 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tom D
Bio-diesel, Propane & Alternative Diesel Engine Fuels
25
05-24-2009 05:26 PM
CheaperJeeper
Bio-diesel, Propane & Alternative Diesel Engine Fuels
8
01-29-2009 03:53 PM
Gun-Driver
Bio-diesel, Propane & Alternative Diesel Engine Fuels
34
04-18-2007 09:24 PM



Quick Reply: Waste streams question



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.