Notices

Liquid coal

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 10:05 AM
  #16  
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 3
From: Iowa
Originally Posted by aurgathor
I think what the feds want is to have several technologies ready when oil prices go up, that's why the tax subsidies on ethanol, for instance.
I think this is by far the safest and best plan.
 
Reply
Old Dec 22, 2006 | 05:34 PM
  #17  
thefarelaneman's Avatar
thefarelaneman
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,175
Likes: 0
From: charlotte nc
They say that oil isnt from fossils now. It a natural renewable sorse...........We have wells all over the place that if used would ruin the oil company profits,you know they are crooks
 
Reply
Old Dec 23, 2006 | 08:03 PM
  #18  
aurgathor's Avatar
aurgathor
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 2
From: Lynnwood, WA
Originally Posted by thefarelaneman
They say that oil isnt from fossils now.
Who says that? What is the source?

It a natural renewable sorse.........
Problem is, the "creation" of oil is a lot slower than the current use, and whatever we're using now were created over the period of many million years.

We have wells all over the place that if used would ruin the oil company profits
Evidence please.
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 09:01 AM
  #19  
jimandmandy's Avatar
jimandmandy
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 5
From: Running Springs CA
Originally Posted by aurgathor
Every fossil fuel produces lots of CO2, there is no escape from that.
Not all hydrocarbons have the same percentage of carbon to hydrogen and that is significant. Coal is mosly carbon, so it produces the most CO2 by far, even when compared to oil. Natural gas (methane, CH4) is mostly hydrogen and produces the least CO2.

Jim
 
Reply
Old Dec 24, 2006 | 05:00 PM
  #20  
aurgathor's Avatar
aurgathor
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 2,899
Likes: 2
From: Lynnwood, WA
Well, that is certainly true; however, fuels should be compared to their equivalents, i.e. diesel to a diesel made from coal, and in that case CO2 emissions shouldn't be significantly different. As a matter of fact, if anything, the coal based fuel could be a tiny bit better since it may not have as much aromatics as crude based fuels.

Another thing is -- energy content. To get the same amount of energy one would need to burn more methane than, say, diesel, and that would increase CO2 emission somewhat.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ken_C
1994.5 - 1997 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
29
Jul 13, 2016 04:57 PM
Ravenwood Ranch
General NON-Automotive Conversation
2
Feb 22, 2014 02:00 PM
Blueovals&Blacksmoke
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
70
Feb 9, 2010 10:00 PM
JBronco
1978 - 1996 Big Bronco
3
Feb 4, 2002 10:09 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:12 AM.