Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

performance chip?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Oct 4, 2006 | 07:39 PM
  #1  
maceface89's Avatar
maceface89
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
performance chip?

I have recently purchesed a 1990 F150. Within the first week i put a k&n cold air intake and a new exhuast, but im still looking for a little more power. I came across this perf chip called race mod that aparently tricks the computer into voidin all of the governer codes. It say it increases 20+ hp and 12ft/lbs of torqe.I was wondering if any of you guys know if its any good or if its just a scam. any advice would help.
Thanks
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 10:01 AM
  #2  
subford's Avatar
subford
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Top Answer: 1
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 23,666
Likes: 301
From: Easton,Ks
Take a look at this post:
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/5...nics-here.html
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 10:43 AM
  #3  
Conanski's Avatar
Conanski
FTE Legend
15 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Community Builder
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 31,930
Likes: 1,499
From: Ottawa, Ontario
Well for starters there is nowhere to put "a chip" on the 1990 EEC IV computer. There is a service port, but to utilize it some additional hardware/software is needed. Many of the hot rod chips just advance the timing and then require you to run premium fuel.. not always the most cost effective thing to do. You can get the same results just by turning the distributor a few degrees.
 
Reply
Old Oct 5, 2006 | 07:50 PM
  #4  
mudguy33's Avatar
mudguy33
Junior User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 63
Likes: 0
From: sudbury
wasted money

if you are going to spend money on a chip and you all ready spent some on an intake, what goes in must come out. You are better of spening it on an exaust system, Iwent headers and 3"single sytem and am very happy. It sounds awsome and looks good too, and noticed a bit of performance differance
 

Last edited by mudguy33; Oct 5, 2006 at 07:58 PM. Reason: hit wrong key
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 09:16 AM
  #5  
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Liked
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 14,285
Likes: 12
From: Bend,OR
conanski is right on, save your money and get some headers an bassani y pipe. maybe upgrade the cam etc.. is this a 2wd or 4wd
 
Reply
Old Oct 6, 2006 | 12:30 PM
  #6  
SR_Crewchief's Avatar
SR_Crewchief
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Lathrop, MO
Mace,

These "chips" don't fool the computer per say. They are part of a module that plugs into the J3 test port of you computer. When that port is used the computer bypasses the onboard memory where the control tables are stored and looks at the port instead.

Conanaski is correct to a point. Most of the cheap off the shelf chips are doing you any favors. They are either advancing the timing or increasing the duty cycle of your injectors (over fueling). Sometimes both. The advanced timing is forcing the need for higher octane to reduce/prevent dentination.

For about the same money as one of these "chips" you can get noticable improvements without the need for high octane fuel.

Hopefully the new exhuast you but on is less restrictive than the stock system.

Some will say to replace the stock airbox assembly with one of the aftermarket kits. Not really needed. The stock box just needs a little attention payed to reduce the baffling restrictions and a better flowing filter.

Add a hotter coil and supporting TFI module on the distributor. Then open the spark gap from stock .045 to .050-.060 (depending on the coil) to take advantage of the hotter spark.

Pull the codes from the computer and fix as required.

You should see a noticable improvement in throttle response, horsepower, and torque. If you can keep your foot out of it, an improvement in mileage as well.


I'd stay away from changes to the computer until you start changing things like the cam. Then work with a good dyno shop for a custom tune that will match you mods.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 02:14 PM
  #7  
94blackbeast's Avatar
94blackbeast
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
spark plug gap

hey guys i got a 94 f150 2wd auto with a 5.0 now i have been reading a lot about people saying opening up your plug gaps to .5 to .6 well i am wondering why they are saying that stock is .045 cuz it is not .52 to .56 is actually stock so that is why when you guyz open your gaps from .40 to .5 to .6 it is such a noticable increase in a lot of things. Thats cuz ford designed our engines to run a plug with a .52 to .56 gap
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 02:23 PM
  #8  
biggreentank's Avatar
biggreentank
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: South Georgia
I think if you open up the gap much more than stock on a stock engine your pistons will be mad at you.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 04:28 PM
  #9  
94blackbeast's Avatar
94blackbeast
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
yah i bet they would be but the point i am trying to make is that everybody thinks that the stock gap is .044 so then they think they are opening it up bigger than stock to .056 when in reality that is stock and when they open it up to stock their truck does run better because the gaps are at what the computer was designed for
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 05:33 PM
  #10  
pud's Avatar
pud
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
maremont pn# M30001 3" mandrel bent tailpipe for 66-96 F-series pickups/broncos. Side exit behind the pass. side rear wheel. $37.04 CDN

put a new y-pipe infront of that. I think the catco ones have larger pipes than the bassani. Could be wrong tho.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 09:19 PM
  #11  
SR_Crewchief's Avatar
SR_Crewchief
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 457
Likes: 0
From: Lathrop, MO
Unless you've increased the coil output openning the spark gap greater that stock isn't such a good idea. You may actually cause a reduced fuel burn. But... if you've increased voltage then openning the gap can be benficial because you'll get a slightly incease ignition area and improve burn effiecency. Marry that with improved intake and exaust flows and you'll get better performance and economy.
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 09:46 PM
  #12  
biggreentank's Avatar
biggreentank
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: South Georgia
I don't know about the other engine options but the stock 4.9 gap is .042-.046. Says so on my hood sticker
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 09:56 PM
  #13  
94blackbeast's Avatar
94blackbeast
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
well i got a 5.0 and my hood says in between .052 and .056 so
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 10:03 PM
  #14  
biggreentank's Avatar
biggreentank
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 399
Likes: 1
From: South Georgia
Ok cool. Slap some .056's in and burn some rubber!
 
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2006 | 10:26 PM
  #15  
94blackbeast's Avatar
94blackbeast
New User
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
ha yah actually i got 35s and am only gapped to .54 and can still burn rubber so hey every start gapping there plugs to .54 you will get hecka more horses and torque. Oh wait i forgot the reason i can burn rubber is cuz i actually gapped my plugs to the right setting. huhh so if mine are gapped like ford says to then maybe if every one else gaps like ford says to they will get the original performance ford said they would wow what a concept ford engineers acually were on to something. No Ford can't know whats best for their engine. oh well
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE