Turbo alternative
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Power...21789774QQrdZ1
Seems like with the right pulley sizes it would provide as much boost as a turbo, without near the complicated exhaust plumbing. What would be the drawbacks? I know that (in theory) a turbo is driven by "wasted" energy from the exhaust flow, but in the real world anything in the flow path of the exhaust HAS to restrict the flow somewhat - which has to rob power. Especially on a diesel where free airflow is such a critical component of making more power. There's no free lunch.
So why wouldn't this work as well as a turbo? Or would it?
A supercharger can however provide more snappy acceleration as there is no lag. Much like a current state of the art dual turbo setup.
There have also been marine diesels set up with both a supercharger and a turbo. Trying to get around the lag issue, componded in the marine environment by having "only" one gear ratio, even though there is some slippage in the fluid medium.
David
That unit would be lacking CFM on a 6.9 that only turns 3300 RPM.
Also I was checking out some of the supercharger kits, turbo kits cost about 1/2 as much.
There is nothing wrong with superchargers, you just need to find one that is the right size to work right. The amount of work required to get the drive belts and plumbing right will probably be more than what is required to install a turbo because several people manufacture IDI specific turbo kits already.
Now I wonder if I should turbocharge the supercharger, or should I supercharge the turbocharger?
I know the kits are more expensive than a turbo kit, but I'd be inclined to see if I might buy a used unit and build the rest of it myself. Doing the same with a turbo would be a lot more difficult.
It'll be a while. Gotta get 'er running right and do the basic intake & exhaust mods first to see whether I even feel the need to do forced induction. Just looking ahead and exploring options....





