2.3L performance
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
2.3L performance
Im thinking about getting a 2.3 Ranger 5sd man. (98-02?) for gas mileage and had a few questions. I've read around, and the power of the 2.3 seems a little questionable. Anybody know about the 0-60 time? Any thing that might give me an idea of what kinda power they have, how much do they weigh? Do you have to take it real easy to get the really good gas mileage? And they get 23-25 mpg easy?
Post Fiend
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 8,462
Likes: 4
From: Durant, OK (SOSU)
Welcome to FTE!
Those years are the 2.5L years, basically the same engine.
It's gonna be slow. Take it slow and steady, shift early, be gentle about everything (you'll be last outta the lights) and you'll make your targets for MPG.
Those years are the 2.5L years, basically the same engine.
It's gonna be slow. Take it slow and steady, shift early, be gentle about everything (you'll be last outta the lights) and you'll make your targets for MPG.
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,651
Likes: 0
From: Maine
I have a '97 with the 2.3, a friend has a 2000 with the 2.5. Both are manual trans trucks.
The 2.3 is a little bit slower (and happens to be a lot older), but burns a bit less gas in my limited experience. I drove the 2.5 600 miles one weekend, and got about 22 mpg. My 2.3 gets 25-27 on that same run. I was going faster (70 vs. 62) in the 2.5 because the front suspension was in better condition, though.
Neither truck is all that fast. It doesn't bother me, and I love the mileage I get. I really can't comment about how gently you need to drive to get your target mpg. I tend to drive gently out of habit and to save wear on my truck, and when I need to push it because of traffic, I do. I get what I get for mileage.
RP is correct that the 2.5 is closely related to the 2.3. It is the same block but stroked out. After mid-'01, they went to a completely different, Mazda-designed, 2.3 (DOHC).
The 2.3 is a little bit slower (and happens to be a lot older), but burns a bit less gas in my limited experience. I drove the 2.5 600 miles one weekend, and got about 22 mpg. My 2.3 gets 25-27 on that same run. I was going faster (70 vs. 62) in the 2.5 because the front suspension was in better condition, though.
Neither truck is all that fast. It doesn't bother me, and I love the mileage I get. I really can't comment about how gently you need to drive to get your target mpg. I tend to drive gently out of habit and to save wear on my truck, and when I need to push it because of traffic, I do. I get what I get for mileage.
RP is correct that the 2.5 is closely related to the 2.3. It is the same block but stroked out. After mid-'01, they went to a completely different, Mazda-designed, 2.3 (DOHC).
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,147
Likes: 0
Your better off to get an 01 and up duratec dohc 2.3, more stock hp, and torque, better mpg, and there's a host of aftermarket performance parts from companies like cosworth. Cosworth has kits that can give you up to 250 hp without forced induction. A lot of the parts are made for the focus, but thingd like cams, heads, stroker kits can be used on the ranger. The 2.3-2.5 lima is a good engine, tried and true since the pinto days, but if power and mpg is a concern, go with the 2.3 dohc duratec.
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7,147
Likes: 0
A vette, just kidding !! It has close to a 150 hp(the duratec) sorta like the focus. I had one for a weekend as a loaner, it was an 02 with the duratec, and 5 speed, it was like driving a sports car, as long as you kept it reving, it would go. I had an 01 with the 2.5, and a 5 speed, the duratec seemed alot faster with better torque. In 01, they had both, the 2.5 lima, and the 2.3 duratec, it was a mid year change I guess. I don't remember the exact hp ratings, but the lima was around 120 hp, and the duratec around a 150 hp. My 06 focus st has the 2.3 duratec, it has 151 hp, and 154 pounds of torque.
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 549
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, KS
I have a 06 2.3 and I get 28 on average, got 29 last time. At 70-75 it doesn't even struggle up hills. Power compared to others... well I constantly whip the fart can ricers but that doesn't say much.
Trending Topics
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 1,343
Likes: 0
From: Higginsville, MO
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make
Brett Foote
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!
Michael S. Palmer
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home
Verdad Gallardo
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!
Joe Kucinski
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?
Brett Foote
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!
Michael S. Palmer
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!
Joe Kucinski
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026
Brett Foote
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time
Joe Kucinski
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 1
From: Alvin, Texas.
Originally Posted by Southernmudslinger
Im thinking about getting a 2.3 Ranger 5sd man. (98-02?) for gas mileage and had a few questions. I've read around, and the power of the 2.3 seems a little questionable. Anybody know about the 0-60 time? Any thing that might give me an idea of what kinda power they have, how much do they weigh? Do you have to take it real easy to get the really good gas mileage? And they get 23-25 mpg easy?
Well, If my 2.3L 94 SCab truck is any indication, I do NOT take it easy and I still get darn good MPGs.
Let's face it, the truck won't pass anything unless you rev it up. I make full use of 5th-3rd gear highway shifts and watch my tach climb towards 5000 RPMs and then some...
The power might not be "all that", but you didn't look at a 4 cylinder truck for power anyway.
Taking it easy on the revs might get worse gas mileage. My engine has almost 266,000 and I do not baby it.
If I want quicks...well, I am probably getting my Camaro (unrunning v6 version) sold and buying this 94 Mustang GT vert my friend plucked from an auction not too long back...he doesn't know it, but when I started that bad boy up and heard it purr...I can't stop thinking about it.
The Duratec trucks are fine, but until 2006, you were stuck with regular cabs. One reg cab compact truck was enough for me.
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
I was searching around, and found the curb weight of the ranger is 3000lbs. Is Curb weight what you go by as far as how much the whole truck weighs? If so, thats kinda light, the PT cruiser weighs about 300lbs more.
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Anybody know the 0-60 time of the 2.5? The truck i have now, its about 10-11 secs. 0-60. Will the 2.5 spin tires or anything? just curious.......cause my truck wont, but if it does, it just barely does.