Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Claimed horsepower

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 07:50 PM
  #1  
DesertDiesel's Avatar
DesertDiesel
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Claimed horsepower

So with all of the flashing and re-flashing Ford has done to the 6.o, does anyone think that the 6.0 makes anywhere near it's advertised 325/330 H.P? Are there any real word tests that can back up the 325/330 H.P?
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 08:02 PM
  #2  
wb6anp's Avatar
wb6anp
Logistics Pro
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,541
Likes: 5
From: Weatherford Texas.
I don't think my new '06 produces that much that horsepower and it hasn't been reflashed since I've owned it. My '05 has more power. My '06 can't even get out of its own way I thinking of taking it in a seeing if anythng is wrong it does not have the head snapping power my '05 has.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 08:12 PM
  #3  
96turbo's Avatar
96turbo
New User
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
I have an 06 PS and I love it. It was built Mar 06! I pull a 15000lb 5th wheel behind it and can run up hills at 60 all day long. You might want to have it looked at to see if you have a lemmon.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 08:35 PM
  #4  
Kentucky Skipper's Avatar
Kentucky Skipper
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 96turbo
You might want to have it looked at to see if you have a lemmon.
I don't know what good that would do him.

Seriously, my answer would have to be NO. These 6 liters do not have the claimed hp and torque they advertise. The 7.3's have by far more torque than the 6 liters. There is just no bottom end on these new engines. They are ok once wound up, but they don't get going very well. I was just talking to a friend who wrecked a 2000 F450 and had to buy a new 06 F450. His opinion was the same as mine. Our older 7.3's out pull these newer trucks. He has a welding rig on his and uses it to maintain quarry and highway equipment. He said places he could go in the older truck, he didn't have the power to go now and frequently had to have them hook it to a dozer and drag it to the down machine.

Skipper
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 08:39 PM
  #5  
kw5413's Avatar
kw5413
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,098
Likes: 8
From: Great State of Texas
Originally Posted by DesertDiesel
So with all of the flashing and re-flashing Ford has done to the 6.o, does anyone think that the 6.0 makes anywhere near it's advertised 325/330 H.P? Are there any real word tests that can back up the 325/330 H.P?
Have it dyno'd an see. Anything else would be pure speculation.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 08:49 PM
  #6  
Kentucky Skipper's Avatar
Kentucky Skipper
Junior User
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 93
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kw5413
Have it dyno'd an see. Anything else would be pure speculation.
The numbers may be there, but they are in the wrong RPM range for operation of a heavy duty pickup. You can spool it up to where ever and get whatever number you want, but if you go to let the clutch out and it won't move the load it's hauling or dragging, it's not engineered to do what it's supposed to be doing.

Skipper
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 09:06 PM
  #7  
raptor131's Avatar
raptor131
Cargo Master
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 2,116
Likes: 6
From: Florida
Club FTE Gold Member
i'm gonna look into dynoing mine soon. it's completely stock so a good baseline is in order. question is what smoothing factor sae? hope noone hits the 4wd switch on the dyno... lol
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2006 | 11:53 PM
  #8  
DesertDiesel's Avatar
DesertDiesel
Thread Starter
|
Junior User
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 54
Likes: 0
Dyno'd would be a great idea if it wasn't lifted 6" and turning 35's with 3.73's. I was just having a discussion about how it feels like I've lost power with every flash. The truck does run better, it just doesn't perform as well. My friend with an '05 feels the same way and his is stock.

I just wondered if anyone else noticed the same and had a baseline to compare advertised to actual.....
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 12:36 AM
  #9  
n6nfg's Avatar
n6nfg
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 394
Likes: 0
From: s.f. bay area
I don't have a calibrated base line from a dyno, but I do have a good reference point. I tow an 8000lb travel trailer (no where near the towing limits of the truck). There is a nice 7% grade going north on highway 101 coming out of San Luis Obispo, CA. The first time I took this grade with my 2004 stock truck with no reflashes (June 04 build) I was able to drive 65 mph up the grade with the trailer in tow. Now 1 1/2 years later in February this year, with several reflashes and no other modifications, towing up the same grade produces around 53 mph max. This was before any low sulfer diesel was introduced, so I can't use that for an excuse! I have definately seen a reduction in usable power. The RPM is around 3200 in 4th gear as I recall, so the engine should be in a nice section of its power curve. Otherwise the truck is running fine, no complaints.

And Ford wonders why customers are resorting to tuners on these trucks. I have never used one yet, but they are starting to look attractive to me. I really miss the performance I had when the truck was new.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 12:54 AM
  #10  
bocomojoe's Avatar
bocomojoe
Senior User
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 327
Likes: 1
From: Columbia, MO
96Turbo, I have about the same build date as you. Have you had the 05E16 reflash done? If so, any changes. I have not taken my truck in yet for the reflash. My 5-W is only about 8,000 lb, however. This truck pulls my 5-W much better than my 96 did. Fuel mpg is about the same.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 06:58 AM
  #11  
smokin_6.0's Avatar
smokin_6.0
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 256
Likes: 0
do not let them flash your truck unless you find it has a problem!!!!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 11:21 AM
  #12  
gp42gpw's Avatar
gp42gpw
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 285
Likes: 0
From: Dunmore Pa.
Skipper, I agree that the power does not come on fast enough but I can't imagine not being able to go where a 7.3 did. Maybe because mine is the stick I just slap in in granny low and go if I can't go just use 4-Lo. Maybe his is an 2wd auto which I never drove.
I have a friend with a F-550 4x4 6Spd and a oil tank on back and he makes it to all the off road sites to fill machines he does need 4-Lo at times

I do wish it made more power off of idle but 1800 she wakes right up and still stomps all over my old 351W
Glen
05 F-350 4x4 Reg Cab PSD 6Spd.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 05:43 PM
  #13  
bansheemike's Avatar
bansheemike
Mountain Pass
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 1
From: Left Coast
Originally Posted by n6nfg
I don't have a calibrated base line from a dyno, but I do have a good reference point. I tow an 8000lb travel trailer (no where near the towing limits of the truck). There is a nice 7% grade going north on highway 101 coming out of San Luis Obispo, CA. The first time I took this grade with my 2004 stock truck with no reflashes (June 04 build) I was able to drive 65 mph up the grade with the trailer in tow. Now 1 1/2 years later in February this year, with several reflashes and no other modifications, towing up the same grade produces around 53 mph max. This was before any low sulfer diesel was introduced, so I can't use that for an excuse! I have definately seen a reduction in usable power. The RPM is around 3200 in 4th gear as I recall, so the engine should be in a nice section of its power curve. Otherwise the truck is running fine, no complaints.

And Ford wonders why customers are resorting to tuners on these trucks. I have never used one yet, but they are starting to look attractive to me. I really miss the performance I had when the truck was new.
I pulled that same grade 2 weeks ago with 26' toy hauler/4 atv's and full water\fuel....65 no problem(Superchip Tow Safe)
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2006 | 06:12 PM
  #14  
Customz's Avatar
Customz
Postmaster
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,508
Likes: 0
From: Utopia
Originally Posted by Kentucky Skipper
I don't know what good that would do him.

Seriously, my answer would have to be NO. These 6 liters do not have the claimed hp and torque they advertise. The 7.3's have by far more torque than the 6 liters. There is just no bottom end on these new engines. They are ok once wound up, but they don't get going very well. I was just talking to a friend who wrecked a 2000 F450 and had to buy a new 06 F450. His opinion was the same as mine. Our older 7.3's out pull these newer trucks. He has a welding rig on his and uses it to maintain quarry and highway equipment. He said places he could go in the older truck, he didn't have the power to go now and frequently had to have them hook it to a dozer and drag it to the down machine.

Skipper
The miners at work just rave about the 6.0 power. an no one has a problem going anywhere...
 
Reply
Old Jul 14, 2006 | 08:58 AM
  #15  
RanchRodsTX's Avatar
RanchRodsTX
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 425
Likes: 0
From: Fate, TX
After all the crappy flashes they threw at my '04 I won't let them do another one. I have my Bully Dog Triple Dog working great, mileage @18.6 in town and plenty of power when I want it. Towing only became an issue after that EGR flash. I won't do the EBS flash.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:28 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE