Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

MPG and Hypertech

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 30, 2006 | 10:18 AM
  #1  
cmcmeans's Avatar
cmcmeans
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
MPG and Hypertech

I have an 06 6.0 4x4 and have installed the hypertech programmer and have seen my mpg drop from 14mpg avg to around 13mpg on stage 3. Now i know most people will think I keep my foot in it all the time, but this is not true. Under normal driving situation I would think my mpg would be better even before the hypertech programmer. My 04 6.0 avg around 17 mpg. Does anyone know what the difference might be? I would also like to state that my onboard computer states i am gettin 19mpg with the hypertech but it is only 14mpg. Without the programmer the computer is spot on. I feel like hypertech is deceiving me by tricking the computer to calculate a higher mpg. Any opinions would be greatly appreciated
 
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 12:09 AM
  #2  
bansheemike's Avatar
bansheemike
Mountain Pass
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 193
Likes: 1
From: Left Coast
I just bought one and it won't even load. It gave me an error and said to call them. I think I might send it back to where I bought it...
 
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 07:26 AM
  #3  
MobeyDick's Avatar
MobeyDick
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
If you expected a Programmer, Chip or anything that boosts the HP and Tg. to get you better Fuel Mileage You don't understand that it take more Fuel to to get that Extra HP and Tg. I've yet to see any get a truck or car better Fuel mileage!!
 
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2006 | 03:22 PM
  #4  
AGE mechanic's Avatar
AGE mechanic
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Actully, you should be seeing better mileage. They arnt tricking your computer to make your display read higher MPG. They are tricking your computer so your 6.0 can put out more power. I think pretty much all of them read wrong on the overhead display. You must hand cal. to be acurate.
 
Reply
Old Jul 3, 2006 | 11:27 AM
  #5  
cmcmeans's Avatar
cmcmeans
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
The computer reads 14mpg stock and also calculates to the same when i calculate it by hand. When i have the hypertech installed the computer reads 19mpg, but when i calculate by hand it still is 14mpg.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 10:17 AM
  #6  
gray90's Avatar
gray90
New User
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
i have a 2000 f250 v-10. mileage before hypertech tuner-12.1 city, after hypertech tuner- 13.3 city.
 
Reply
Old Jul 21, 2006 | 05:07 PM
  #7  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by MobeyDick
You don't understand that it take more Fuel to to get that Extra HP and Tg. !!


Not true.

Most tuning devices make power more efficiently, with less engine load.

I'll keep this response short because this is an over-discussed subject.
You are making an outrageous claim when you really don't have any research to back it up.

Did you know that many vehicles make power running LESS fuel than stock, even at WOT?

Even my 06 Audi Turbo, while making 50 more HP with an APR flash, still gets 2 MPG better than stock overall.

Granted, most "Performance" diesel tunes will only yield mileage gains if you aren't flooring it from stoplight to stoplight. But remember, thats a new "learned" driver behavior due to increased power.
It's kind of like a new relationship....you tend to "wear it out" for awhile. =o)

Calculate stock mileage.
Calculate tuned mileage. Even if you step on it every now and then, you'll be surprised what you find.

Nevermind the overhead "lie-o-meter". It tries to calculate fuel consumption based on load (and other factors) and when the truck is tuned, it has trouble calculating.

I'll close with this:

Do some research.
I spent years tuning gas and diesel engines, testing, tuning, monitoring calculated engine load, hand calculating mileage (going so far as to weigh each batch of fuel for specific gravity consistency).

Forgive me if I'm being a little harsh on you , but you were quick to jump on a soapbox and tell someone what they don't understand.

Nothing personal, just do a little more research before you jump to your "logical" conclusions.

Please don't take this personally, I just can't stand misinformation.
 

Last edited by Vic_Ferrari; Jul 21, 2006 at 05:22 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 08:23 AM
  #8  
MobeyDick's Avatar
MobeyDick
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
“You are making an outrageous claim when you really don't have any research to back it up.”

Let’s see my Research, 100,000 miles on my totally stock 01 7.3 it averaged 17.152682 MPG. At 100,000 miles I installed a Hypertech Power programmer III, Fuel Mileage on First tank was lower as was the Second, Third, Forth Fifth and so on!! Over the next 100,000 miles the fuel mileage dropped to 15.993861 MPG that is the total average for all 200,000 miles the second half 100,000 miles to 200,000 miles was even more dramatic At 14.897957 MPG!! Truck was totally stock, until 161,000 miles, at that time I put Wider Rims and Tires on it!! Mileage went down then also! I put a lot of miles a year on my trucks and I’m a little **** about Fuel mileage.

No one and I mean no one I have ever talked to in person has ever claimed that a programmer has ever made their truck get better Fuel mileage!! On the contrary to a man every one of the people I have talked to has stated the programmers have decreased the Fuel mileage!!

I’ll close with this:

Do some research?

I spent years Driving gas and diesel engines, monitoring, hand calculating mileage.

Forgive me if I'm being a little harsh on you, but you were quick to jump on a soapbox and tell someone what they don't understand.

Nothing personal just does a little more research before you jump to your "illogical" conclusions.

Please don't take this personally; I just can't stand LIES and misinformation.

I will state this again, Programmers, Chips, Etc. will NOT get you better Fuel mileage!! More power Equals More Fuel. You can add small amounts of Power 1or 2% without more Fuel but that’s about all!! After that it’s more Fuel and more money!!
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 09:09 AM
  #9  
Vic_Ferrari's Avatar
Vic_Ferrari
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,584
Likes: 0
From: Lake Mary, FL
Originally Posted by MobeyDick
“You are making an outrageous claim when you really don't have any research to back it up.”

Let’s see my Research, 100,000 miles on my totally stock 01 7.3 it averaged 17.152682 MPG. At 100,000 miles I installed a Hypertech Power programmer III, Fuel Mileage on First tank was lower as was the Second, Third, Forth Fifth and so on!! Over the next 100,000 miles the fuel mileage dropped to 15.993861 MPG that is the total average for all 200,000 miles the second half 100,000 miles to 200,000 miles was even more dramatic At 14.897957 MPG!! Truck was totally stock, until 161,000 miles, at that time I put Wider Rims and Tires on it!! Mileage went down then also! I put a lot of miles a year on my trucks and I’m a little **** about Fuel mileage.
!

Your isolated "experience" in one truck with one programmer on on particular tuning strategy applies to everyone?


Have you ever tuned a diesel truck, performed any kind of controlled mileage test (including weighting the fuel, measuring flow, etc..)

Can you explain what calculated engine load is? Can you put together a working injector timing curve?

Do you understand you can add power (significant power) while still inducing less engine load at cruising speeds. even while towing?

Do you understand what calculated engine load and VE are?

Have you tested multiple programmers on many different trucks and tracked mileage trends?

You are misinformed and inexperienced in this matter.

Theres a saying I used to use a lot:
"Talk what you know".

I don't tell an architect how to design his buildings, and he doesn't try to tell my what I don't know about tuning and fuel mileage.

Again, I'm not talking down to you.......but you are making comments in an area out of your expertise.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 09:48 AM
  #10  
wildcat421's Avatar
wildcat421
Senior User
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
From: Laporte , Indiana
IMO , If you are buying a tuner to increase mileage. You are buying for the wrong reason. These chips are sold because of hp and TQ gains. They advertise the extra fuel mileage as a bonus.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 10:11 AM
  #11  
MobeyDick's Avatar
MobeyDick
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,521
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by cmcmeans
I have an 06 6.0 4x4 and have installed the hypertech programmer and have seen my mpg drop from 14mpg avg to around 13mpg on stage 3. Now i know most people will think I keep my foot in it all the time, but this is not true. Under normal driving situation I would think my mpg would be better even before the hypertech programmer. My 04 6.0 avg around 17 mpg. Does anyone know what the difference might be? I would also like to state that my onboard computer states i am gettin 19mpg with the hypertech but it is only 14mpg. Without the programmer the computer is spot on. I feel like hypertech is deceiving me by tricking the computer to calculate a higher mpg. Any opinions would be greatly appreciated
Do your own test and get back with us. Drive 10,000 miles they way you would normally. Then install the ANY Programmer and drive the way you would normally. Please post the Results because some would have you to believe that the Laws of Physics in our Universe can be overcome with the Laws of some other un-parallel Universe.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 12:54 PM
  #12  
Whopper809's Avatar
Whopper809
Junior User
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
From: Spruce Grove,AB, Canada
I agree with this statement completly, I have seen many vehicles gain fuel economy by increasing HP numbers. ( as long as you can control your foot)
Originally Posted by Vic_Ferrari
Not true.

Most tuning devices make power more efficiently, with less engine load.

I'll keep this response short because this is an over-discussed subject.
You are making an outrageous claim when you really don't have any research to back it up.

Did you know that many vehicles make power running LESS fuel than stock, even at WOT?

Even my 06 Audi Turbo, while making 50 more HP with an APR flash, still gets 2 MPG better than stock overall.

Granted, most "Performance" diesel tunes will only yield mileage gains if you aren't flooring it from stoplight to stoplight. But remember, thats a new "learned" driver behavior due to increased power.
It's kind of like a new relationship....you tend to "wear it out" for awhile. =o)

Calculate stock mileage.
Calculate tuned mileage. Even if you step on it every now and then, you'll be surprised what you find.

Nevermind the overhead "lie-o-meter". It tries to calculate fuel consumption based on load (and other factors) and when the truck is tuned, it has trouble calculating.

I'll close with this:

Do some research.
I spent years tuning gas and diesel engines, testing, tuning, monitoring calculated engine load, hand calculating mileage (going so far as to weigh each batch of fuel for specific gravity consistency).

Forgive me if I'm being a little harsh on you , but you were quick to jump on a soapbox and tell someone what they don't understand.

Nothing personal, just do a little more research before you jump to your "logical" conclusions.

Please don't take this personally, I just can't stand misinformation.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 01:26 PM
  #13  
LVEILLON's Avatar
LVEILLON
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 554
Likes: 0
From: Lowsyana
Mobey...My observation of your info shows only one thing. Up till you installed the programmer your fuel mileage was X for your driving style. Then you installed a programmer/tuner. Then your fuel mileage went to Y only because the "Programmer" makes more HP-Torque and the only way to do this is by adding more fuel? Did the truck use more fuel on it's own or was it possibly because you added a programmer/tuner and felt the difference in HP-Torque and kept your foot in the throttle a little more than when it was a stock truck?

I have also owned many Diesel's and put over 150K on the last two...both were programmed with the Superchips 1704 then 1705. For the first tank or so it took me a while to calm my foot down and my mileage came back. I currently have an SCT in my new 06 F250 and I've averaged 18.3 over a period of 9864miles which 90percent is Hwy and half of the fuel comes from Texas (ULSF).

From everyone else around me is getting anywhere from 14.5-16 on their stock trucks.
Perhaps it was the programmer that you had. I always had luck with my Supertuners and am having a little better results with my SCT.
 
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 02:35 PM
  #14  
hschiro's Avatar
hschiro
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 337
Likes: 0
From: California
Thumbs up

I have installed and been using a Superchips programer that was most likely programed by Vic_Ferrari before leaving Superchips since early on with my truck. (I know this isn't the hypertech you have been talking about, but programmers basically all work the same.) I have tested the unit loaded in all stages- non towing and towing vs. stock towing and non-towing. I get on average 3.6-4.0 mpg more towing with the progammer in either economy or performance over stock. Non-towing ranges up to 5.0 mpg better, but that is not common as without a trailer behind the rig, my foot sinks deeper and deeper into the pedal.
 

Last edited by hschiro; Jul 23, 2006 at 02:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2006 | 03:24 PM
  #15  
AGE mechanic's Avatar
AGE mechanic
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 900
Likes: 0
From: Arizona
Originally Posted by MobeyDick
Do your own test and get back with us. Drive 10,000 miles they way you would normally. Then install the ANY Programmer and drive the way you would normally. Please post the Results because some would have you to believe that the Laws of Physics in our Universe can be overcome with the Laws of some other un-parallel Universe.
????
Vic is right!
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE