distributor gear
and carb set up for my 77 150 would a steel gear be ok , i know the cast iron gear would not work (for long) i know there is a issue w/ gear on a roller cam
Last edited by rainbowATF; Feb 27, 2006 at 05:53 PM.
I'll have to look into the different shaft diameter thing...
ON EDIT: Armed with my trusty digital calipers I just dug into my vast collection (or is that large pile...? Yes, I think the term "pile" would be more appropriate) of Ford parts and pulled out 2 distributors. 1 is a TFI unit from a recently acquired '93 T-bird 5.0 HO roller cam engine, the other is a Duraspark unit of indeterminate age but believed to be late-'70s vintage.
I took measurments of each of the shafts and discovered...that both measured .450". No difference in shaft diameter. There was a difference in shaft length however, the late-model unit being some 1/2" longer at the the tip. So I would say that they are indeed interchangeable. (Your results may vary.)
Last edited by TigerDan; Feb 28, 2006 at 08:24 PM.
cast iron and steel gears ... so thats cool
this is because the differences of material that the cam is made out of (from what i can tell)
I think I also read it here. Hope I'm wrong; then it would be easier and cheaper.
Trending Topics
I was first informed of this this past summer; with neighbor's 1948 Ford truck. It has a 302 EFI roller and is converted to carb and duraspark II. A bushing had to be made by a machinist. There are aftermarket gears of steel and bronze with correct ID. You can again use the Duraspark II from a 1985 Mustang 4 brl with manual trans. It has steel gear; then use your cast gear dizzy as a core. The separate gear will cost as much as a reman dizzy. You can also get a performance dizzy with steel gear. This gets messy swapping gears. If you need links for reference I'll try to find them again. I will be doing this again this summer; as I am putting my 92 302 roller in my dad's 31 Model A coupe.
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
I think I'll dig out all the 289/302/5.0 distributors I have and check all of them. This may be another one of those mysterious inconsistancies, like the guy who say that he has a late '80s 5.0 with factory 28oz. imbalance...an impossibilty according to all my books, but there it is.
If you're planning to change the whole distributor, the 1985 Mustang HO had a vacuum advance Duraspark distributor with a steel gear for roller cam, part number E5ZZ-12127-B
What are your issues with mounts and headers?
Rainbow- you got this message when trying to post the links here in this forum? The system isn't supposed to do that. Email me the links and I'll look into it and post them here myself.
Last edited by TigerDan; Mar 3, 2006 at 09:29 AM.
mount for the 400 is offset to the back about 1.5 inch ,
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/s...d.php?t=467785
https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/s...d.php?t=463995
i will get that distributor ...that will work great
Last edited by 77effie; Mar 3, 2006 at 11:35 AM.
Now, let me tell you my story to see if there's any useful information in it for you.
I have a '72 f250 camper special. A number of years back I pulled the FE 390 out of it and swapped it into a '78 F250 that had a 400. I had to remove the motor mount perches from the '72 and swap them into the '78. The frames were identical between the two, insofar as the crossmember was concerned and it was a straight bolt-in swap.
So now I was left with a perfectly good '72 F250 with no engine or tranny. I had a '72 Ranchero that was on its last legs, but under the hood was a fairly fresh 351C. Now, the 351C shares the same motor mounts and bellhousing bolt pattern with the 302/351W, not the 351M/400 (which shares thier patterns with the 429/460) so I decided that the 351C should take up residence in the '72 F250. I did some junkyard scrounging and found a mid-'70s F100 or F150 that had once had a 302 in it, and bought the motor mount perches from it. They bolted straight into my '72 (I might have had to drill a hole or two, I don't recall now) and the 351C then bolted straight in, as would a 302.
For headers, I used the ones from the Ranchero as they were the only ones I had for the bigger 351C-4bbl ports. They were almost a straight bolt in, but there was some interference from the support that runs across the frame under the front of the tranny connecting the brackets that the ends of the radius arms bolt to, so I did a probable no-no...I removed the support figuring I'd deal with it later. (Well, I was in a hurry to get the truck on the road, I had a 600-mile trip to take in it the next day!)
So, I'm thinking that motor mounts certainly won't be a problem, it's not really the mounts you need but the perches. And as for headers, there's so much room under the hood of one of these trucks with that little 302/5.0 that you shouldn't have too much difficulty in finding headers to fit. Just about any shorties will probably clear, and you could always do what I did...junkyard scrounging, picking up any old headers I could find for a smallblock Ford. I have quite a few sets and whenever I'm doing a swap I try different ones to find something that'll fit. Those '80 headers will probably work but I can't swear to it, and Bronco headers will probably work as well.
Last edited by TigerDan; Mar 3, 2006 at 05:31 PM.
i have purchased the frame mounts and the 302 and 400/351m
frame mounts are slightly different ..enought to cause havoc
i now have the right ones , bought the 85 stang distributor two thumbs up
THANX !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



