Notices
General Automotive Discussion

Emission testing question again........

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 01:13 AM
  #1  
parks911's Avatar
parks911
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,543
Likes: 2
From: Georgia
Question Emission testing question again........

While burning a high octane gasoline, will it cause higher (richer) numbers when they stick the sniffer in your exaust pipe?

I'm not sure if any of you have seen my failed emissions thread but now I'm wondering if the gasoline could be a factor in it as well.

Ofcourse it is a new engine & needs to be broken it. I've tested it twice since the new engine went in.
The first test it blew some outragous numbers that caused me to fail.

The second test (after driving it awhile, maybe a month ~ no repairs even attempted from the first test.) Blew half of the numbers of the previous test.

Now I have to get it tested to renew my tag (previous testing was just trying to get it to pass before it's time). Tonight I realized that I've been running the highest octane fuel the station have to offer. It is a high performance motor, so I want to feed it what it deserves.
But if the lowest octane will help me lower my numbers to pass emissions, I will be happy to run a couple tanks of low octane to pass, then buy the well deserved fuel afterwards until inspection time again.
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 01:49 AM
  #2  
73Fastbackv10's Avatar
73Fastbackv10
Elder User
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 946
Likes: 4
From: Orange
What compression ratio are you running? What type of engine (fuel injected, etc.) If you engine is computer controlled, you have to program the computer for a higher octane fuel if it wasn't set up for it. A lower octane will drop emission because it burns quicker.
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 01:55 AM
  #3  
parks911's Avatar
parks911
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,543
Likes: 2
From: Georgia
Can't remember the compression ratio. It is not fuel injected or computer comtrolled. It used to be, but with all the changes the computer & fi went bye bye & the carb was slapped on.

So a lower octane will give lower burn numbers??
I'll have to buy a tank of low octane tomorrow to burn. I'm going to retest once again on Monday so I guess I'll find out soon enough.
I've been burning 92 or 93 octane. I think the station I frequent has 87 octane. I'll try that just to pass emissions.
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 03:35 AM
  #4  
Sycostang67's Avatar
Sycostang67
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,493
Likes: 16
From: Kuna ID
Yes, running high octane fuel can make you fail smog if your motor doesn't need it. I had the same problem trying to smog my 67 mustang. I tried carb and timing adjustments, but nothing helped until I switched to 87 octane. If your motor doesn't ping on the 87, than thats all you need. THere's no point wasting money on 92 octane fuel if you vehicle doesn't benefit from it. Run the 87, if it passes the test and the motor doesn't ping, then stick with it.
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 04:16 AM
  #5  
tdister's Avatar
tdister
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: central TX
A lower octane fuel may give lower numbers, it may not. Some high octane blends burn faster some slower than lower octane counterparts, it depends on the formulation (which is basically impossible to find out on a constistant/relialbe basis, if at all). You can NOT look at octane numbers alone to tell. Octane rating is resistance to exploding, explosion and burn are not the same thing.

If you are borderline give it a try, it may and probably will change slightly, but if you're way out still, don't expect any miracles. I forget what vehicle you're dealing with, but carbed motors seem to be more sensitive to the specific gravity differences between the fuels (in a positive way for your situation), so give it a try. That's not a fact, just a trend I've noticed. I wouldn't worry about running tankfuls through, just run it low and fill it up with the cheap stuff,it should be a fairly instantanious change.

Maybe you could run a heavier oil for the test? It sounds like maybe it's just oil getting past the rings still, ie. not broken in. Any other problems/oddities? What was high? HC, NO..? Low temp thermostat or anything else?
 

Last edited by tdister; Feb 25, 2006 at 04:45 AM.
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 09:48 AM
  #6  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Yeah, report back what thermostat you put in, and the numbers from the testing.

What year, motor, etc?
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 09:49 AM
  #7  
TexasGuy001's Avatar
TexasGuy001
Hotshot
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Liked
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 11,958
Likes: 228
Sycostang Why did you have to smog test a 67 Mustang????????????
 
Reply
Old Feb 25, 2006 | 11:18 AM
  #8  
Greywolf's Avatar
Greywolf
Fleet Owner
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 29,941
Likes: 46
From: Drummonds, TN USA
Running higher octane means the mix will (hopefully) only fire off when it is supposed to, a lower octane might pre-ignite and could cause the engine to burn more thoroughly but it would be better to run the correct octane (whatever that is) and adjust your timing for the best and most complete burn in the cylinders.

If you wanted to get way deep into it you could reduce:
1) the idle mixture.
2) the main jet size.
3) the metering rod height adjustment if it is a carb that has them, such as a quadrajet.

Theoretically, you can create your own vacuum leak to thin out the mixture the cheap way, but this is not something you want to do unless you can change it back quickly - as in right after leaving the test station.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

 Brett Foote
story-2

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-6

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-7

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
Old Feb 26, 2006 | 08:35 AM
  #9  
Sycostang67's Avatar
Sycostang67
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 5,493
Likes: 16
From: Kuna ID
Originally Posted by TexasGuy001
Sycostang Why did you have to smog test a 67 Mustang????????????
Because Idaho sucks! The smog exemption applies to vehicles built in 1964 and all previous years. I only had to do it once though. I soon learned that if I registered my mustang as a classic, I wouldn't have to smog it. A vehicle has to be at least 30 years old to be registered as a classic, but they assume you don't drive the vehicle much. My stang only gets driven when its warm anyway, so it works out.
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2006 | 01:08 PM
  #10  
jimandmandy's Avatar
jimandmandy
Post Fiend
20 Year Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 5,228
Likes: 5
From: Running Springs CA
The #1 thing you can do to help pass the tailpipe sniffer test is to retard the timing. I know this is counter-intuitive but true, especially for CO. As someone else mentioned, a higher temperature thermostat also helps. It needs to be run lean, yes, but lean misfire will cause HC to skyrocket.

Jim
 
Reply
Old Feb 26, 2006 | 02:36 PM
  #11  
parks911's Avatar
parks911
Thread Starter
|
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,543
Likes: 2
From: Georgia
Well I'm not smogging it tomorrow now anyhow.

Just dropped the transmission about 30 minutes ago. 3 times in one year...... Thank god for warranties!!!!
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:04 AM.

story-0
10 Ways Ford is LOSING to the Competition

Slideshow: 10 ways Ford is losing to the competition

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-15 09:52:01


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now

Some great targets in today's expensive world.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-15 09:35:19


VIEW MORE
story-2
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-4
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-6
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-8
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-9
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE