Explorer, Sport Trac, Mountaineer & Aviator 1991-1994, 1995-2001, 2002-2005, 2006-2010 Ford Explorer

V6 vs V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 01-09-2006, 07:05 PM
arin's Avatar
arin
arin is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah, I thought that may be it. Is it able to pull down a tailgate with the window going up? I know this is on Blazers. I'd like to be able to put backseats down and maybe have things extending out of the back, but that would be difficult with the hatch in the air above the car.
 
  #17  
Old 01-09-2006, 09:49 PM
4.0 Beast's Avatar
4.0 Beast
4.0 Beast is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
no, no explorer has that capability except the sport trac, which is essentially a truck tailgate

i've had to do that before with mine and i just tie down the door as far down as it will go to the hitch
 
  #18  
Old 01-10-2006, 04:32 PM
arin's Avatar
arin
arin is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ah, never thought of that. Does anyone know how far it is between the back of thr front seats and the tailgate(with backseats down) for 2dr & 4dr?
 
  #19  
Old 01-10-2006, 05:05 PM
Viking2005's Avatar
Viking2005
Viking2005 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 145
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you loose between a 1 foot to 1 1/2 feet of length in the cargo area with the rear seats down if you go for a two door.

Regarding engines, I had a 97 4.0L SOHC, 5 HP and 40 Ft/lbs less than 5.0L. I did not want AWD, due to gas milage and going offroad. I was never disappointed in power with this truck, which I used to tow a boat and go offroading and gas milage (25 mpg highway with 3.55 axles, make sure you check what axle ratio you get, this greatly affects gas milage!!!!!!! The lower the number better gas milage, higher number better for towing. I would get 3.55 unless tow regularly, than go for 3.73 or 4.10 based on size of trailer load and distance towing.). Fully loaded, the extra torque of the V8 is desirable, but unless you are towing or caring large loads alot, the 4.0L SOHC is ok. In the newer Exploreres (2002 and up), I went for V8, because new Explorer is 500 lbs heavier than old one and you feel that weight with the V6 when you have 4 adults in it.
 
  #20  
Old 01-10-2006, 05:26 PM
4.0 Beast's Avatar
4.0 Beast
4.0 Beast is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i never had a 2nd gen v6, i only had the old 1st gen v6 which was anemic. i couldnt get up hills on a highway when going on a ski trip. and that was just with myself and ski equipment! it would have to come out of overdrive and pedal was almost to the floor. with my new v8 it never comes out of overdrive. not going back to a v6 again. even if i bought a brand new explorer (2006)
 
  #21  
Old 01-10-2006, 05:54 PM
arin's Avatar
arin
arin is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well, do you know actually how long the bed would be with backseats down?

The newer V6s seem to be a lot better than older and near the v8s in power. Would the ohv 4.0's be better for pre-1995 models? How much weight was added in the 95 remodel?

ohv v6 4.0L 145 - 160HP / 220 - 225 torque
ohc v6 4.0L 205 - 210 / 240 - 250
ohv v8 5.0L 210 - 215 / 280 - 288
ohc v8 4.6L 240 / 280
 
  #22  
Old 01-10-2006, 06:07 PM
4.0 Beast's Avatar
4.0 Beast
4.0 Beast is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 504
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
remember, hp doesnt really matter too much in these trucks, as 4x4 low speed, towing, and going up steep hills relies on torque. i know the hp is close on the newer v6's with the v8's, but look at torque, you get loads more.

btw guys this is my opinion, dont attack me now.

they didnt make v8's pre 1995. 1st gens only had the v6 option.

on weight, v6 to v6; 1st gen to 2nd gen; 4x4; weight was up about 150 pounds on the 2nd gens

on the length issue, i'll have to measure for you, but i can only give you the 4 door measurement, dont have a 2 door
 
  #23  
Old 01-10-2006, 07:14 PM
natewhit2's Avatar
natewhit2
natewhit2 is offline
New User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 12
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BlueOval5.0
I have the 5.0 V8 in my 1998 and I've gotten as high as 22 MPG doing 95% highway driving. The motor was around 40 years so it is tried and true. I believe the difference between the 6 & 8 is 1 MPG or less.

I don't know about the newer models but models through 2001 that had the V8 only had AWD vs a true 4x4 in the 6 cylinder. So, consider that as well.
Really? that means I have never seen another V8 explorer with the exception of mine. Unless they were dedaged, but I have never seen another explorer wth an AWD badge like mine has.
 
  #24  
Old 01-10-2006, 08:23 PM
BlueOval5.0's Avatar
BlueOval5.0
BlueOval5.0 is offline
More Turbo
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 683
Received 6 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by natewhit2
Really? that means I have never seen another V8 explorer with the exception of mine. Unless they were dedaged, but I have never seen another explorer wth an AWD badge like mine has.
I'm not sure what you are referring to but my Explorer doesn't have an AWD badge, just the standard V8 emblem on each side by the front doors.
 
  #25  
Old 01-12-2006, 10:05 AM
arin's Avatar
arin
arin is offline
Freshman User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 44
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Anyone able to measure the back? Was there a length difference before the 95 remodel?
 
  #26  
Old 01-16-2006, 08:23 PM
spearfisherman's Avatar
spearfisherman
spearfisherman is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: St. Pete, Florida
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I've got a '91 w/ the 4.0 and an '02 with the 4.6. The 4.6 absolutely kicks it's butt in all respects. The old 4.0 has 210,000 miles so I can't say anything too bad about her But, the mileage is about the same and always was from what I remember when the 4.0 was a lot younger. I'd get the 8 again if given the choice.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
seschenburg
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
2
09-22-2016 08:54 AM
sqdqo
1999 to 2016 Super Duty
22
02-17-2016 10:15 AM
trinibob
Modular V10 (6.8l)
26
01-25-2011 06:47 PM
buckethead5k
Clutch, Transmission, Differential, Axle & Transfer Case
5
12-15-2007 10:59 PM
1961 - 1966 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
6
03-23-2001 08:24 AM



Quick Reply: V6 vs V8



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:11 PM.