When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
hey, i am wondering if there are any other differences in the two cams other than anoticible power gain when using roller. as in life of the cam? fuel milege? i want to put a roller cam in my 351 but that would require some more work and money. Also would a 5.0 h.o. EFI cam work in a 351w EFI with the roller cam conversion conversion. thanks alot
cam life is supposed to improve- reduction in friction, better mileage. not sure about the efi stuff. The cost for a retro roller is probably over $800 by time it's done. I recently had a custom grind and it retailed for over a grand for k-kit. I was lucty get parts wholesale for $575.
because a roller cam uses a roller on the lifter instead of just a flat spot, the lobes can have a sharper and faster ramp allowing the valve to spend more time at full lift than a flat tappet cam for the same duration, and at full lift thier is more air flow, which means more performance without sacrificing drivability.
I guess Max is an aggressive roller,High would be solid flat tappit, Medium is agrrssive hydraulic, Mild is stock hydraulic roller tappit motor like 5.0 Ho, Typical Oem is just an ordinary stock hydraulic flat tappit
I do not know but I am only guessing on every run, does anybody know?
you have the Max right but high would be a milder circle track type of roller or aggressive hyd roller, medium would be less agressive hyd roller or solid flat tappet, med would be an aggresive hyd, or typical solid or possibly a very mild hyd roller.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalytic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.