Notices

a few 400 tips?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 12:49 AM
  #1  
mad scientist:p's Avatar
mad scientist:p
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, Indiana
a few 400 tips?

ok this might take a min. i have two trucks at the moment to deal w/. a 79 1 ton w/ 400 and a 78 w/ 300. the ton is dads and the 78 is mine. dad wants my 300 in his ton (it has AC by the way...odd option in our area) and i want the 400. so even swap but i gotta do all the work! no biggie. so i build custom trucks...they are usually what people call "lowriders" but really they arent. they are called minitrucks, lowrider is a generic term. so i wanna build a full size now. but not lowered too much (like a 5 or 6 inch drop, not too drastic). bigger rims (like 20's, no bigger) but i want the truck to have that hot rod feel. basically i wanna be able to smoke the tires in all 4 gears or at least 3 of em. and be able to blow away the local 5.0's and bowties (or at least keep up). so what i should have said is, what can i do to build a high torque and fairly high hp 400? i have read in the forum and noticed that many people say to use aussie heads? and rattle off all kinds of numbers to do w/ cams and valves and what not. ok i think...think i want the 400 to have high compression? that means flat top pistons right? not sure what is best. and can i stroke it a little or is it pretty well a long enough stroke? i know that they were build for torque, or at least thats what i have read. it wont be a daily driver, just another show and weekend truck. i have driven the ton that the 400 is currently in and it seems to only have power at low RPM. but then again i know the rear end ratio has a lot to do w/ that (not sure what the ratio is...i read there were only 2 options for that truck i think 411 and a 5 somethin). im also not sure what ratio the 78 has. it was a 300 automatic, im thinking probably high 3 somethin. i would have to check but i dont know how other than to jack it up make two marks and spin the wheel. and easier way?

Im not much of a motor man. suspension and body work are my things. However, i am trying to learn about engine specs and what would be a good motor to build. Im just a little confused at all the numbers. any help woould be appriciated. thanks
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 12:55 AM
  #2  
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 575
From: Brentwood,CA
Club FTE Gold Member
you will also have to swap trannies. the 400 i would skip and look for a 460. you will have to make custom a/c brackets for the 300.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 01:01 AM
  #3  
mad scientist:p's Avatar
mad scientist:p
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, Indiana
i think i may have misled you a little. dad is keeping his 4 speed and i already have a 4 speed i have had for a while that Im going to mate to the 400. and for the AC, i know its the same compressor for each motor but different brackets. and thats no big deal to make new brackets. the only thing is that i have to let the AC go w/ the 300, but thats no biggie. 2 60 air doesnt bother me (thats 2 windows down at 60 mph) and i thought about droppin in a 460, but the 400 is free and i want it just because its an oddball motor. So far at all the local (Louisville,KY and Indianapolis, IN area) car shows i've been to, i have only seen very few 400s.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 01:04 AM
  #4  
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 575
From: Brentwood,CA
Club FTE Gold Member
ok so then instead of complete tranny swaps you need to swap the bell housings. the 400 won't bolt up to a 300 bellhousing or the other way around. you don't see to many 400's because no one wants one.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 01:12 AM
  #5  
roger dowty's Avatar
roger dowty
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
From: western montana
[QUOTE=you don't see to many 400's because no one wants one.[/QUOTE]

all the better for those who know their potential. I'd do a 400 over a 460- any day. I'd also do a fe (390) over a 460 as well. 460 isn't special at all unless you want to waste tires after an expensive conversion and build. 400 is a great low end motor when built right.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 01:21 AM
  #6  
roger dowty's Avatar
roger dowty
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,068
Likes: 0
From: western montana
also, the 400 has the longest stroke of a stock ford motor- can be built to major porportions and is a unique motor- once you say 460- people simply say ok and go their merry way- a stroked cleveland required a little more attention. And yes, you go another 1/4" on the stroke- see tmeyers site (sponser) he's building one- I think the stroked 400 may be competetive with all but the 7k plus builds on a 460.

I also am under the impression that a 400 is a better motor when built for low end and will get decent mileage while delivering far more than a stock 460.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 01:34 AM
  #7  
mad scientist:p's Avatar
mad scientist:p
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, Indiana
ok another quickquestion. i know that the 351M has a crank w. a shorter throw than the 400. and i know that the 351M pistons are taller than the 400. and that they both use the same rods. so here's my question. can i put 351M pistons in a 400 or will ther not be enough clearance? i think i will keep the factory heads for now (lack of funds while at college) and just have them cleaned up and maybe ported and polished? you tell me. and install an intake. i have heard you can slap on an intake for a cleveland w/ a spacer. i know that there arent many intakes out there for a 400. but there are a few so maybe i am better off w/ one for a 400 and not the cleveland? again, you tell me.

roger dowty, i hear you on keeping the 400. i am fond of the 400's and not the 460's. i like oddball things and i have hear great things can come from the 400 as long as its done right.

i know that my 400 has very low oil psi when warm, and still not so good when cold. when i rebuild the motor little by little over the winter, i will have the crank ground/polished (whatever it is that they do) and have fitted bearings and seals b/c the just buying standard ones are not a good idea and will cause low oil psi.

Oh, and ford390gashog, i know that the bell housings are different. i have several SB (lack of better word at the moment) and only one for a BB (again lack of better word). so swapping the bellhousings is not a big deal.
 

Last edited by mad scientist:p; Dec 13, 2005 at 01:38 AM.
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 01:45 AM
  #8  
mad scientist:p's Avatar
mad scientist:p
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, Indiana
ok i got this from a ford inspired article...


Unfortunately, the 400’s design had one major flaw that was not resolved before production began. When the 351C 2V cylinder heads were installed on an engine with 15% more stroke (15% more displacement), the compression ratio produced by flat-top pistons similar to the 351C 2V pistons was 10.2:1! To get the compression down to a more reasonable level in the 400, Ford engineers developed a piston with reduced compression height and a small dish (8 cc), and a new 400-specific cylinder head with a slightly larger combustion chamber (77.8 cc). With the relatively high-octane leaded fuel available in the early 1970s, this was an acceptable compromise, and it produced a compression ratio of 9.2:1. However, when unleaded fuels were mandated a few years later, the increased deck clearance of the 400 piston would cause problems.

Beginning in MY 1973, Ford retarded camshaft timing by 6 degrees on all 335-series engines (except the 351C 4V) to meet emission control regulations. Camshaft timing was retarded by changing the keyway offset from the alignment mark on the crankshaft timing sprocket.
ok, so if the first 400s had 10.2:1 compression, if i buy pistons for the first year can i get that compresion ratio? and second, ford retarded the timing by 6 degrees, can i advanve it by 6 degrees? or will it run hot?
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 01:59 AM
  #9  
mad scientist:p's Avatar
mad scientist:p
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, Indiana
a little more of what i found...

Several unique parts were developed for truck M-blocks, including flywheels for manual transmissions, harmonic balancers, and truck-specific intake and exhaust manifolds. The original “non-retarded” crankshaft timing gear was also re-introduced on truck engines

The 351C and 400 pistons have the same compression height (wrist pin to top of piston), but the M-block wrist pin is slightly larger than the 351C wrist pin.

The 351M piston is unique, with a taller compression height than 351C and 400 pistons, and it is not interchangeable with any other engine.
so does that mean that the 79 truck 400 is not retared by 6 degrees (that its not retarded at all?). and about the pistons, i guess the 351M and 400 don't interchange?
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 06:19 PM
  #10  
mad scientist:p's Avatar
mad scientist:p
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, Indiana
umm ok, i guess i'll just have to figure it out on my own then? yeah, thought so
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #11  
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 575
From: Brentwood,CA
Club FTE Gold Member
the engine is retarded at the cam by 6 degrees. the 351m and 400 use the same pistons.
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 09:55 PM
  #12  
ron_29_1973's Avatar
ron_29_1973
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 173
Likes: 0
the first 400 in 1971 had 9.0 compression 1972 to 1982 had 8.0
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 10:36 PM
  #13  
f-4x4's Avatar
f-4x4
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 225
Likes: 0
the 351m and the 400 dont use the same pistons
 
Reply
Old Dec 13, 2005 | 10:44 PM
  #14  
mad scientist:p's Avatar
mad scientist:p
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 154
Likes: 0
From: Terre Haute, Indiana
i know that they dont use the same pistons, i was just wondering if i could swap out the two or not...i am taking it that i cant. and ron_29_1973, im not so sure those compression ratios are right. i have read from many manuals and web sites about the specs on 400s. not all say the same, but are close. and i know that it had high compression when ot first came out b/c it wouldnt run very well on pump gas so ford decreased the compression ratio. but it was a high 9 or even 10.
 
Reply
Old Dec 14, 2005 | 07:05 AM
  #15  
firstonraceday's Avatar
firstonraceday
Laughing Gas
25 Year Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 781
Likes: 18
From: East Texas
You can use the 351M pistons in the 400 as long as you also use a 351M crankshaft.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:24 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE