Timing Chain or Belt - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums

Timing Chain or Belt

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-11-2005, 12:43 AM
HaroldCallahan HaroldCallahan is offline
Junior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 56
HaroldCallahan is starting off with a positive reputation.
Timing Chain or Belt

Does the 2.3 in the new Rangers have a timing chain or belt ? How does the 2.3 compare to the 3.0 V6 in terms of gas mileage or reliability. My current ranger has the 3.0 which I am very happy with. All I have done is change the plugs, oil/filter, air filter and fuel filter with this 3.0 - no problem at 150,000 miles. My next Ranger may be the 2.3. Mostly highway driving at about 70 to 80 mph getting about 24 to 25 mpg.

I am very curious to know if the 2.3 would be as trouble free and economical.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 01:04 PM
JD717 JD717 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Hudson Florida.
Posts: 966
JD717 is starting off with a positive reputation.
The 2.3 from my experience, and what I've heard, is a very reliable and strong motor, just not REALLY powerful. in terms of fuel economy, it is pretty good. my carbed 2.3 seems to be getting around 20-26mpg or more doing around 50-60mph. I kinda like it.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 02:46 PM
AlfredB1979 AlfredB1979 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Alvin, Texas.
Posts: 1,978
AlfredB1979 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Mazda has been cranking out pretty good 4 cylinders for quite a while, so they have a wee bit of practice.

I believe the 2.3L only has 4 spark plugs on it, so that can't be a bad thing...though I like my 8 plug setup.

I believe the D-tec 2.3L is a belt setup as well. The mpgs blow away most 3.slows, and the peak hp is similar, but it takes a little longer to get to it, since the 2.3L is very "peaky".

My old school 2.3L gets about 30mpg's doing anywhere near a normal speed limit, but still gets ~25ish doing 80ish on the highway.
Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2005, 03:49 PM
xlt4me xlt4me is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Northwest Indiana
Posts: 547
xlt4me is gaining momentum as a positive member of FTE.
The Duratec 2.3L has a cam chain and as far as I can tell from searching this site and the internet it is very reliable. The best mileage I have gotten, ( at least when I checked ), was 29mpg and that was with a light load in the back. Mine is an '04 reg cab with auto. I have heard of some with the stick getting over 30mph on the highway.

Here is a little more info on it...


Last edited by xlt4me; 12-11-2005 at 03:52 PM.
Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2008, 01:19 PM
sneak's Avatar
sneak sneak is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: South Eastern MN
Posts: 682
sneak is starting off with a positive reputation.
Since we're allready talking about timing belts, how often are they supposed to be changed? I've got fifty thousand miles on my 96 ranger with a 2.3L.

EDIT: Holy crap this is an old thread... lol
Reply With Quote

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Timing Chain brent1204 Ranger & B-Series 3 07-06-2015 09:18 PM
what year was Duratech 2.3 don77 4 Cylinder Engines 5 11-26-2011 09:18 AM
2005 2.3L Reliability? bigredtruck Ranger & B-Series 15 02-09-2011 11:46 PM
1991 Ford Ranger 2.3L Timing Belt medicpg Ranger & B-Series 1 09-04-2003 11:41 AM
Chaining timing chain on 1990 ford ranger 2.3L fattyarbuckle Ranger & B-Series 2 06-09-2003 12:02 PM

Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > >

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:39 AM.

We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to Amazon.com and affiliated sites.