When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I have a 302 in my F-150. I installed a comp cam and a set of freshened up 5.0L mustang heads. The cam is a 114 lobe seperation .481 intake and exhaust lift i believe like a 258 duration cam. My truck now likes to idle at 1300 rpm. It was surging prior to me cleaning the throttle body but it was idling down to 675 rpm. now it doesnt idle down but no surge. on a scan i had performed the injectors were pulsing alot the O2 sensor was giving me an error so i replaced it. Anyways half a tank later i have only got 100km's on the half tank. thats about 60 miles. I used to get 175km's on the top half maybe even 200km's. fuel economy is down close to half. any idea's?
The Truck is a 92 F-150. Yes it is a computer controlled truck. Comp Cams claim this is a computer controlled efi friendly cam. The O2 sensor was replaced about a 1/4 tank ago. My wife says the check engine light came on for her the other day. ill have to check the codes again. The 334 code came up before and i imagine thats the code still has to do with voltage to high to the egr. When i disconnect the idle control sensor (which i cleaned) i still notice the idle going up and down sometimes. I waas under the impression that that meant that the tps is going. i checked the voltage on the tps and it is set up now, however i did notice that the sensor isnt smooth to rotate when i uninstalled it. perhaps i should look at changing that. I used a tiger torch of propane and ran it all over the intake and vacuum lines to see if the idle would jump any and it didnt so i am now assuming there are no vacuum leaks.
well i cleaned the iac and now the truck idles down to where it is supposed to be. the other thing i did is I reset the computer. I have thought about a performance chip but i was under the impression that i would have to run premium gas is that the case?
why don't you drive it for a week or two and give yourself some time to get it running right as it is. it should be plenty peppy enough and throwing in a new chip would just add another variable.
Just remember... A little chip can mean a big drop in fuel economy. Learned that with my buddy's 302 150. He now gets 7 city and 11.5 hwy. These are below averages after a chip, but that doesn't make the numbers hurt any less.