Notices
Ford vs The Competition Technical discussion and comparison ONLY. Trolls will not be tolerated.

F-150 rated below average

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 12:48 PM
  #16  
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 4
From: Iowa
I think they got their ratings backwards. You can pretty much look at whatever CR says, and reverse it.

Bad = good, good = bad. Get it?
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 12:57 PM
  #17  
jcooley's Avatar
jcooley
New User
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
Most persons who read CU are the nanny-state/granola grinder types.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 06:21 PM
  #18  
seftonm's Avatar
seftonm
Senior User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 219
Likes: 0
From: Winnipeg, Manitoba
NickFordMan: All those criteria you listed are irrelevant to a reliability survey, which seems to be what we are talking about here. We all know that CR always puts Honda and Toyota at the top.

92TripleBlack: Did you hear about Bose suing CR over "unscientific testing methods" when their speakers didn't do so well? After that, their speakers have always been rated highly, even though they're overpriced with very low build and sound quality.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 06:57 PM
  #19  
92TripleBlack's Avatar
92TripleBlack
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by seftonm
NickFordMan: All those criteria you listed are irrelevant to a reliability survey, which seems to be what we are talking about here. We all know that CR always puts Honda and Toyota at the top.

92TripleBlack: Did you hear about Bose suing CR over "unscientific testing methods" when their speakers didn't do so well? After that, their speakers have always been rated highly, even though they're overpriced with very low build and sound quality.
Not surprised. BOSE has always sucked. I own two in cars. Junk. I used to install car stereos for a living so I understand how they work. BOSE uses port harmonics to accentuate certain frequencies that are pleasing to human ears. But overall, they are really just cheapo crap speakers with second rate amps riding on their overrated name. BOSE either stands for BUY OTHER STEREO EQUIPMENT or No highs No lows, must be BOSE. Can't figure it out yet. But this does show CR caving. They probably get paid more by TOY and Honda.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 07:15 PM
  #20  
Bagger's Avatar
Bagger
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 521
Likes: 0
I started ?? the engineering staff when they went full out in a sami in the rain braked hard in a corner and wondered why they rolled???
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 07:27 PM
  #21  
slipnotic's Avatar
slipnotic
Junior User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
Lol! I have to disagree about the bose comment though, I have one in my home and I cant say a bad word about it
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 07:30 PM
  #22  
92TripleBlack's Avatar
92TripleBlack
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by slipnotic
Lol! I have to disagree about the bose comment though, I have one in my home and I cant say a bad word about it
Have you shopped for a stereo at a stereo shop, not Best Buy or Circuit City, and seen what you can get for the same amount you spent on the BOSE? Trust me, very low bang for the buck. The speaker drivers cost $3 each.
 
Reply
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 08:20 PM
  #23  
BigF350's Avatar
BigF350
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Photogenic
Photoriffic
Shutterbug
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
FTE Emeritus
Probably should get this back on to talking about Trucks guys
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-2

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-3

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-4

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-5

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-6

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-8

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 2, 2005 | 08:35 PM
  #24  
NickFordMan's Avatar
NickFordMan
Posting Guru
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,221
Likes: 5
Originally Posted by seftonm
NickFordMan: All those criteria you listed are irrelevant to a reliability survey, which seems to be what we are talking about here. We all know that CR always puts Honda and Toyota at the top.

92TripleBlack: Did you hear about Bose suing CR over "unscientific testing methods" when their speakers didn't do so well? After that, their speakers have always been rated highly, even though they're overpriced with very low build and sound quality.
I listed reliability. Engine strength, drivetrain superiority. All part of that. I have first hand experience with the reliability of the 2005 F-150's. They have a VERY strong drivetrain, and the 5.4L V8 is a proven engine. Everything on this truck is built so much better, yet they say the Ridgeline is on the top? Give me a break.
I don't understand how they can actually rate the Ridgeline like that, not too mention it's not even a friggen truck. Favorable to certain auto manufacturers is what it is.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 09:44 AM
  #25  
amish77's Avatar
amish77
Cargo Master
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 2,148
Likes: 0
From: Seneca, SC
actually from what I remember bagger, the sami was fine in the original test, then a corporate exec went through the test for kicks and screwed up. He cut the corner too tight, hit the breaks, didn't correct when the thing started tipping, and rolled it. The next week of testing, CR modified the test to make it replicate his screwups. Then they published the "results". That's why they got sued and shouldn't be listened to anymore. They modify tests to favor certain companies that they wish to favor at the time. Usually the imports, and the higher priced ones at that.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 04:52 PM
  #26  
cjstang's Avatar
cjstang
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
I'd agree CR is suspect at best, but IIRC, the 2 wheel drive version was rated 'average' reliability, the 4WD version was rated below average "because of problems with front axle engagement" (this was for the '04 model year) - and I can't fault that diagnosis. Winter's coming and I'm sure we'll see a whole new list of people looking here to find out why their 4WD won't engage - my new '03 lasted maybe a few engagements before it stopped working - still needs to be fixed, but it certainly won't be at a Ford dealer. Sure would have thought Ford would have finally fixed this, maybe all the $$ they get fixing 'em (@ 7-8hr for a 2 hour job by a rookie) makes it worthwhile... (come on, a plastic end on the engagement fork that breaks or falls off, and they couldn't have fixed that!)
But yeah, how the heck do they rate the Honda so well - its a new model!!! (esp when this was 'issued' by CR). Any 'new' model from the domestics would have no rating at best. "Its a Honda - its gotta be good" (and if my grandmother had ********* she would have been my grandfather...)
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 05:51 PM
  #27  
1956MarkII's Avatar
1956MarkII
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,746
Likes: 7
From: Tampa Bay, FL USA
Consumer Reports rates vehicles on an absolute scale, with the best car available as the standard by which all other vehicles are judged. Cargo capacity/ trailer-towing/ payload take a back seat to handling/ comfort/ interior room, etc... So, it's not surprising that a car-based pickup like the Ridgeline would do well in their "laboratory." Frankly, we should give credit to Honda for being smart enough to build a vehicle that embraces Consumer Report's testing parameters. Sharp company, that Honda.
 
Reply
Old Nov 3, 2005 | 08:32 PM
  #28  
osbornk's Avatar
osbornk
Postmaster
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 2,511
Likes: 0
From: Marion, VA
Originally Posted by 1956MarkII
Consumer Reports rates vehicles on an absolute scale, with the best car available as the standard by which all other vehicles are judged.
I totally agree. The best car available just always seem to be a UJC (Universal Japanese Car). I wonder if they hire employees the same way? It might be interesting to find out what vehicles are owned by each employee and their spouse or significate other. I'm a motorcycle nut and the testers in several motorcycle magazines rate motorcycles but the motorcycles they actually own are very different from the ones they recommend.
 

Last edited by osbornk; Nov 3, 2005 at 08:35 PM.
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 08:12 AM
  #29  
1956MarkII's Avatar
1956MarkII
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 7,746
Likes: 7
From: Tampa Bay, FL USA
Originally Posted by osbornk
...It might be interesting to find out what vehicles are owned by each employee and their spouse or significate other. I'm a motorcycle nut and the testers in several motorcycle magazines rate motorcycles but the motorcycles they actually own are very different from the ones they recommend.
Same goes for magazines like Motor Trend or Car & Driver. The writer will put down some American car for not being sophisticated enough. "And what do YOU drive, Mr. Writer?" "Uh, a '96 Aspire 5-door..."
 
Reply
Old Nov 4, 2005 | 04:53 PM
  #30  
Logical Heritic's Avatar
Logical Heritic
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,291
Likes: 0
Are you puttin down the EXPIRE. Them things are awesome. The red headed stepchild no one wants. Kant get Korean parts from Kia. Mazda says no mo. Ford says Fiddlesticks. I love em. A 5 year old car with no aftermarket support or factory support. Im gonna buy a dozen.
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:19 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-1
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-2
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-3
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-4
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-5
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-7
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE