more torque in my 302

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 10-13-2005, 11:19 PM
turboguy's Avatar
turboguy
turboguy is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
more torque in my 302

I have a 1990 f150 4x4 single cab long bed with a 302 6 in lift and 33's. I have allready done Intake, headers, flowmaster muffler, electric fan, and a bigger radiator. But I still feel like I am lacking torque. I use my truck as a work truck and I am quite often pulling something or loaded down and my truck really bogs when its heavily loaded. even unloaded you have to kick it down just to get up a hill.

Im wondering what kind of engine building I can do to gain torque.
 
  #2  
Old 10-13-2005, 11:45 PM
Torque1st's Avatar
Torque1st
Torque1st is offline
Posting Legend
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 30,255
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 27 Posts
The 302 is not a torque motor, for that you need cubes and STROKE.

A gearing change to take advantage of RPM's and act as a torque multiplier will help in your situation.
 

Last edited by Torque1st; 10-13-2005 at 11:54 PM.
  #3  
Old 10-14-2005, 12:23 AM
Franklin2's Avatar
Franklin2
Franklin2 is offline
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Virginia
Posts: 53,878
Likes: 0
Received 1,782 Likes on 1,440 Posts
I use my truck as a work truck and I am quite often pulling something or loaded down and my truck really bogs when its heavily loaded. even unloaded you have to kick it down just to get up a hill.
I know what you mean. I put a 351w in my truck, and there is a very big difference in pulling power. I have come to the conclusion that the 302 is a little bit too small for a full size pickup.
 
  #4  
Old 10-14-2005, 12:45 PM
turboguy's Avatar
turboguy
turboguy is offline
Senior User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 271
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I really want to keep this engine if at all possible. I just put it in! my other 5.0 went south and I dropped this one in. plus Im getting 14mpg... and I like that number compared to what I usually hear the 351's get.

btw I forgot to say I have 4.10 gears.
 
  #5  
Old 10-14-2005, 03:05 PM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,274
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
when i did my 302-5.8 swap i gained mpg. the 302 got 12/14 city/hwy and now with the 5.8 i get 12/16 city/hwy. and if your towing your gonna use more fuel with the smaller motor cuz its working harder then a bigger motor with more power.

what kinda intake are you running? and you have headers but whats the rest of the exhaust like? if you want more going to a 4.56 gear will give you more for less then any bolt on or engine mod to that 302 you can make.
 
  #6  
Old 10-14-2005, 04:00 PM
TorqueKing's Avatar
TorqueKing
TorqueKing is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta, Georgia, USA
Posts: 1,712
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
A 4.10 is already incredibly steep for a street truck. The problem with going even lower than that is I don't know the pinion will actually fit in the carrier, assuming you have a 9". You may have to go with a Daytona-style 9" carrier to house the 4.56 pinion. I may be wrong, but the cut-off is somewhere around the 4.56-range.

Another thing to consider is that if you go lower, your driveshaft will be spinning so fast at highway speeds that it is probably dangerous on long trips, considering your LWB configuration.

It sounds like it's just a matter of going a little bit slower, because the 351 swap will definitely cost you some money, although I believe Kemicalburns is right that you'll probably get *slightly* better fuel milage, especially when towing. At 4.10:1, you're basically maxed out in the differential. You could really modify the 302's internals, but it still won't ever be a 351.

I think a 302 is a great full-size truck motor, but not for towing, and not for 4x4.
 
  #7  
Old 10-14-2005, 04:11 PM
MustangGT221's Avatar
MustangGT221
MustangGT221 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Topsfield, MA
Posts: 14,947
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
He has a 8.8" rear and not the 9"...

I wouldn't bother going from 4.10s to 4.56s...stick with the 4.10s.

You won't really ever make good truck torque out of that little 302. The stroke is just too short and it really belongs in cars or lighter vehicles. You can make it do fairly decent but a 351 based engine would do much better. It doesn't really cost a whole lot to switch to a 351, most parts are interchangeable. I just did the swap myself, I was looking at replacing my 302 with another 302, but ended up with a 393ci stroker. Think about it...it might be a better option.
 
  #8  
Old 10-15-2005, 12:30 AM
Polkat's Avatar
Polkat
Polkat is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: CA
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
You might try an RV or other torque cam. This will increase your low end but knock off a few horses at the high end. There are some smog legal ones, but once done, you still probably won't notice a major increase in bottom end over the stock cam.

Yea, it's a bummer to be told the engine you just got through installing won't do what you want, but if you want torque, you have to use an engine designed to make it. I agree, go with the 351.
 
  #9  
Old 10-17-2005, 10:04 AM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,274
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
i did my 5.8 swap for under a grand. I found a 80k mile 5.8 at a wrecking yard complete with great compression and 40lbs oil pressure at idle for $800 . i figure with that low of miles and taking care of it i can expect 180k + out of it. i replaced various parts also this motor was a 95 f4te block so it has the roller cam as well. did the swap myself in the driveway. best 40lb torque gain I could have made
 
  #10  
Old 10-17-2005, 05:07 PM
MustangGT221's Avatar
MustangGT221
MustangGT221 is offline
Post Fiend
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Topsfield, MA
Posts: 14,947
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
It really isn't that hard to pull a motor and put another one in it's place...esp the 302/351 swap.
 
  #11  
Old 10-18-2005, 10:09 PM
bocephus_3349's Avatar
bocephus_3349
bocephus_3349 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: riverton u.s
Posts: 335
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
i have a 93 f-150 xtcab 4wd it has 6 in lift with 35's and 4:56 gears with lockers and dana drive lines. I have no problems pulling or lack of power. Go with the 4:56 gears you will be amazed at the differance
 
  #12  
Old 10-19-2005, 12:41 AM
Mr. Bob's Avatar
Mr. Bob
Mr. Bob is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Delta B.C.
Posts: 641
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the 302 is a good engine.. agree its not a powerhouse, but its good...

I would leave the 4.10s... thats perfect for that setup...

The 302 does have its downs... the one big power gainer on any 302/351 build is the heads... the E7s are not the best for power... small valves, small exhaust ports.... on and on... If you are willing to spend a little $$ do cam and heads... its the best way to add reliable power....
 
  #13  
Old 10-28-2005, 11:58 PM
Bdox's Avatar
Bdox
Bdox is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lake Tahoe, Nevada
Posts: 28,609
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
The cheapest fix is to go back to stock diameter tires.

If you can't stand that idea go for the stroker.
 
  #14  
Old 10-29-2005, 12:02 AM
Bdox's Avatar
Bdox
Bdox is offline
Fleet Owner

Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Lake Tahoe, Nevada
Posts: 28,609
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
The cheapest fix is to go back to stock diameter tires. That would be equal to about a 12 percent gear reduction. Save your thirty-threes for off road.

If you can't stand that idea go for the stroker.
 
  #15  
Old 10-30-2005, 09:03 PM
Kemicalburns's Avatar
Kemicalburns
Kemicalburns is offline
Hotshot
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Bend,OR
Posts: 14,274
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Originally Posted by Bdox
The cheapest fix is to go back to stock diameter tires. That would be equal to about a 12 percent gear reduction. Save your thirty-threes for off road.

If you can't stand that idea go for the stroker.

i think you need to do some more research
 



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:36 PM.