Notices

aussie head differences???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 25, 2005 | 01:56 PM
  #16  
monsterbaby's Avatar
monsterbaby
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 18,423
Likes: 9
From: iowa
actually 78 your right ford never did designate thier engines as small block, big block. (infact I don't believe chrysler did either for that matter) so any judge that says there is no such things as a small block 400, or other such comments needs to have his credibility questioned since his knowledge of vehicles is limited to what he has read in a hot rod magizine, and he is thus not qualified to judge a car show
 
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2005 | 11:47 PM
  #17  
73XAFalcon's Avatar
73XAFalcon
Elder User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Sin City, USA
Originally Posted by 78bigbronco
I guess the best thing would be to find some legitimate ford documentation and stash a copy in the glove box. Or maybe a VIN # listing that shows the 302C?

Oh, and 73XAFalcon, if someone tells you ford never made a small block 400 or whatever, heres a couple things to think about. For one, small block is an industry slang that came from GM. I dont think ford ever classified its motors by small block / big block, instead they used 335 series, 385 series, etc. But using the small vs big block comparison is abvously talking about how big the block is. All the 335 series motors (clev, 351M, 400) used a thinwall, 4" bored block (atleast all that I have heard of). This is very similar to the 302 motors or the GM small-blocks. The ford 'big-blocks' had bores larger than 4" and much thicker castings. So basically the 400 has the same bore size and wall thickness as a 302/351W but it has a mucher taller deck hiegth and longer stroke. And yeah, they came in smaller and larger tranny sizes, but that has nothing to do with how big the 'block' is, just how big the tranny is. Atleast this is what I think about when someone starts arguing about big block vs small block.
Yep, I have tons of Ford AU documentation for the 302C that I take to the car shows. Things like service manuals, magazine test articles from 1972-1973, original dealer brochures, etc.,....

As for the BB vs SB arguement, you're preaching to the choir reverend. The biggest problem for us F-L-M/B-O-P/Mopar/AMC owners is the stupid magazine writers that continue to repeat the same old myths. What is really bad now is that PHR, HR, and Car Craft all employ guys that didn't start driving until the 1990s.....heck, I've had a license since 1983 and was fetching wrenches since I was 5 and my Dad/Uncles/cousins were working on FEs, Nailheads, and the then brand new Clevelands.

--J
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 06:30 PM
  #18  
sparky69's Avatar
sparky69
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
thanks for all the great info. just bought a set of 2v closed chamber aussie heads on ebay for 300. since these have the correct casting # ARD1A(E?) from australia, closed chamber with 2v ports, they seem to be the right ones i was looking for. had them magnafluxed and decked .007" to compensate for warpage. any suggestions on setting these up so they will move my 77 f250. i believe i have a stock cam but have not decided on a replacement yet...
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 08:13 PM
  #19  
tastyklair's Avatar
tastyklair
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Pa
In order to really get the performance of the heads you need to have a cam that will take prper advantage of them and you need to get your deck clearance to .050 or less for quench. If you don't get both of these right you could end up with a real pinger even on higher octane gas. The cam companies give you a recommended cr for a given cam which you should go by. The split duration cams seem to be the best on these motors. To get the deck clearance you may need other pistons. I forget now where the stock ones will leave you at. Now that I think of it they may get you close. The other option is to get the block decked. This is very important!
 
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2005 | 08:29 PM
  #20  
monsterbaby's Avatar
monsterbaby
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 18,423
Likes: 9
From: iowa
remember it's not the piston to deck hieght that has to be .050 (tasklair your post kinda leaves that open for misinterpetation) but rather the total piston to head distance needs to be less than .050, so if your running the typical felpro gasket that is .041 nominal compressed thickness, you need to have the piston within .009 of the deck of the block. Also these blocks are never straight unless it's been decked before mine was out by .017 in one direction so get it squared up and decked to the needed hieght if you don't square it and say one side is off like mine was you could have one piston with perfect quench of .050, and the one on the opposite corner being .067 so that piston will have detonation issues big time.
first thing is find out how square that block is, and second find out the nominal compressed thickness of your head gasket, and then find out were your pistons are sitting in relationship to the block now and go from there.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 09:02 AM
  #21  
sparky69's Avatar
sparky69
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Wisconsin
is this why TMI(?) zero deck height pistons are favored over other types of "flat top" pistons?
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 11:04 AM
  #22  
tastyklair's Avatar
tastyklair
Elder User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 867
Likes: 0
From: Eastern Pa
Quite right MOnster. Yes that is why TMI's pistons are preferred. The original Badger flat tops like I got sit down even further than a stock piston. Mine are .070 in the hole, but I am not using the aussies.
 
Reply
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 11:12 AM
  #23  
Bill_Beyer's Avatar
Bill_Beyer
Posting Guru
25 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 2,416
Likes: 4
From: PacNW
Total distance from the top of the piston to the flat surface of the head inside the bore is the key to reducing detonation. The quench effect is simply the turbulence created in the A/F mixture when the top of the piston comes in close proximity to the head during the compression stroke. It promotes a better burn and therefore less chance of detonation. Actually .050" is the maximum distance that one can expect to gain an advantage from the quench effect. .035" is the number I've seen that will give maximum quench with minimal chance of piston/head contact in a street engine with an expected RPM range of <6500. Remember heat changes things, parts expand, etc. Add a little high RPM effect and things start to make contact that shouldn't resulting in VBN (very bad noi$e$)

Now, the 400 was built with a compression height that puts the piston down the hole .060" to start with so the pistons Tim offers have an increased compression height to put them at near zero deck which allows you to tailor your C/R based on the heads you plan to use. In this case with the 302C heads you can get everything squared up, determine your desired C/R and have the pistons milled accordingly which will give you the best combination of power & driveability.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-2

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-3

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-4

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-6

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-7

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-9

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
Old Sep 4, 2005 | 12:32 AM
  #24  
73XAFalcon's Avatar
73XAFalcon
Elder User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
From: Sin City, USA
Originally Posted by sparky69
thanks for all the great info. just bought a set of 2v closed chamber aussie heads on ebay for 300. since these have the correct casting # ARD1A(E?) from australia, closed chamber with 2v ports, they seem to be the right ones i was looking for. had them magnafluxed and decked .007" to compensate for warpage. any suggestions on setting these up so they will move my 77 f250. i believe i have a stock cam but have not decided on a replacement yet...
I think you paid too much but I'm not a good judge as my situation at this moment allows me the opportunity to import parts for myself in limited quantities but at fairly low rates. That said, I'd suggest you have the combustion chamber walls laid back to unshroud the valves and lower compression. Other than adding hardened exhaust seats, a good 3 angle valve job, and some quality one-piece valves, you shouldn't need much more work.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 09:50 AM
  #25  
bhawkin2's Avatar
bhawkin2
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: West Jefferson,ohio
Can you put the 351c Aussie heads on a 400? Can you use the 400 intake an exhaust or do you have to use a 351c intake an exhaust?
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 10:27 AM
  #26  
monsterbaby's Avatar
monsterbaby
Hotshot
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 18,423
Likes: 9
From: iowa
the aussie 2v closed chamber heads are a bolt on swap for the 400 heads same port sizes, and bolt patterns same rocker arms everything with the exception of they won't have the smog port on the exhaust side, and no place to put the AIR lines.
 
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 10:31 AM
  #27  
grclark351's Avatar
grclark351
Posting Guru
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,003
Likes: 2
From: chicago burbs
yes they fit on the 400, be aware that the chamber volume is for a 302" engine and the 400 cubes will cause the compression ratio to climb. a lot. all factory and aftermarket 351M/400 intake manifolds, exhaust manifolds and headers fit the aussie heads perfectly. you would only use a Cleveland or other intake if you are building a 9.2" deck Cleveland engine, or you want a specific manifold that is not available for the M/400, like a Cleveland Parker FunnelWeb, or a 289/302 dual quad intake. crazy stuff, spacers required.
 

Last edited by grclark351; Sep 5, 2005 at 10:50 AM.
Reply
Old Sep 5, 2005 | 06:37 PM
  #28  
bhawkin2's Avatar
bhawkin2
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 116
Likes: 0
From: West Jefferson,ohio
I've got a edelbrock performer.Nothing crazy.Just trying to get the most power out of it. Not trying to built a drag motor.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
derbydad276
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
9
Jan 29, 2020 08:18 PM
Kruse
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
13
Nov 30, 2014 04:59 AM
jimdandyf100
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
55
May 15, 2014 06:02 PM
Dejayp
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
Oct 2, 2013 03:47 AM
hivoltj
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
5
Jun 21, 2013 10:25 AM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:37 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-1
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-2
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-3
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-6
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-7
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-8
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-9
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE