Notices

v6 vs inline 6

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 2, 2005 | 07:21 AM
  #16  
rmanTX's Avatar
rmanTX
Laughing Gas
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 782
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by BrianA
I does dawn on me now that we really are comparing apples and oranges.
The 300 was designed and mfgrd in a different era with a different intended purpose.

FWIW, I couldn't give to hoots (personally) about which is the "better" truck motor.

To each his own.
couldn't have said it better myself!
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 12:03 AM
  #17  
Black4.2's Avatar
Black4.2
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
Well Said!......Its all personal preference....

I owned a 89 ford f-150, I have owned a 01 4.2 and now own a 05 4.2l. Out of them all the 4.9l was the worst. I loved the lowend torque. It could pull a house if it wanted to.But driving down the road at 75mph....no...It was rough..AND it sucked gas like a hoover vacuam cleaner sucking dirt off a floor. Two: I had to allow plenty of time for passing and accelerating. I would rather the 4.9 for towing, but how can you even start comparing a 4.9l to a 4.2l..Notice the engine is big enough to a dadgum v8.(5.0L 302CID) and a 302 makes better gas mileage( Yes I owned one, 85 extended cab f-150, towed just as good). I think the 4.2l is overall a fairly reasoable engine, although I never really liked the idea of a v6 in a full size truck. And I do agree with brian. Retune and build it with the INTENT of being used in a heavy application and it might fare well. Put cast iron sleeves in the cylinders, use forged components with a higher volume oil pump. retune the computer.

But as said. who gives a flying flip on whoch is better. Its a v8 sized inline engine vs. a v6. Thats like comparing a model car tire to a dump truck tire

FYI:<TABLE cellSpacing=0 cellPadding=0 width=545 border=0><TBODY><TR class=reviewbodytext03 onmouseover="this.bgColor='#E9E9E9'" onmouseout="this.bgColor='white'" bgColor=white><TD vAlign=top align=left height=13>ohv I6</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left height=13>4.9 / 300cid</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left height=13>145hp</TD><TD vAlign=top align=left height=13>265tq</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
 

Last edited by Black4.2; Jul 5, 2005 at 12:26 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 07:10 PM
  #18  
DeepRoots's Avatar
DeepRoots
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: Douglas, Georgia
hate to screw with yall.
I like my 7.3 IDI diesel better than both of em.
tho my 300-6 is a fine motor indeed.
 
Reply
Old Jul 5, 2005 | 10:15 PM
  #19  
Black4.2's Avatar
Black4.2
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
hmmm...diesel...thats what I am talking about. I actually checked on torque numbers on the older ones. They didn't make much more torque than a gasoline, but it came at a much lower rpm. But the way gas prices are going, I think we all will be regreting even getting a 4 cylinder
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #20  
DeepRoots's Avatar
DeepRoots
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: Douglas, Georgia
yes yes... low horsepower and torque.
this is true... but I have the options of turbos and propane on the 7.3 (nothing like having your head hit the back windshield when you floor it at 60mph)
there are very few usable add ons to a 4.9

Oddly enough the 7.3 diesel drives alot like the 4.9
they share more in common than timing gears :-)

my F150 300/6 is still on the farm, It isn't worth anything, or at least not enough to be worth selling. Heck when rust eats the rest of the truck, I'll use the damn engine as an irrigation pump :-)

Still helpful in my line of work to have an 'extra' truck just in case.

I've only driven one 4.2
I dunno, after years with low rev engines, I get nervous whenever my truck does 3,300 rpms

drew
 
Reply
Old Jul 6, 2005 | 10:45 PM
  #21  
Black4.2's Avatar
Black4.2
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
After years of driving older model cars with v8, the v6 is an upgrade to me. The last v8 I owned had 150hp and 250trq and it also had 210,000 miles on it. It never towed well even when it was new. The v6 has way more power in it.

Yes for you, it would be scary to drive a v6 that makes its peak trq at 3700 or so
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 12:40 AM
  #22  
optikal illushun's Avatar
optikal illushun
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,545
Likes: 4
From: Coal Region
the 300 can and will lug itself at the bare mininium RPM to get going and keep going. its made to do it. the 4.2 needs to rev its nuts off to get moving compared to a 300.

not saying anything bad about either but the 300 is a better truck engine. the 4.2 is better for the DD/commumter. but i lie because my dads 1995 f150 300/e4od/4x4 has 138,000 and still gets 17-19 mpg. and IMO, it has more than enough get up and go for what is it.
 
Reply
Old Jul 7, 2005 | 08:03 AM
  #23  
DT 466Man's Avatar
DT 466Man
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,454
Likes: 1
From: Adams TN
I agree about the diesel and the 300. They drive alot alike. Shift at low Rpm's and they will both lug a load if you miss a shift going up hill.

DT
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-2

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-3

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-4

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
story-5

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-7

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-8

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-9

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 01:32 AM
  #24  
jcp123's Avatar
jcp123
Elder User
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 542
Likes: 0
From: Milpitas, CA; Tyler, TX
I'm also a 300 I6 guy. My Dad briefly had a '90 F150 XLT with the 300I6 and stick, and at 125k miles it really was just breaking in; it was still smooth, pulled well even from low, low rpm's, and showed no signs of age. It was almost impossible to stall it, I even got it going fairly easily in 4th gear I've heard they're utterly reliable and can be thrashed and trashed with little/no ill effects, and get the better part of a half million miles before needing an overhaul. Gas mileage wasn't bad either, we got about 16mpg with it. It was definitely no racer (hell, some ricer Civic beat the crud out of it), but when it came to all the things a truck is supposed to do, it did them fabulously and without complaint. In fact, in some ways I preferred it to the 5.2 Ram 1500 he has now.
 

Last edited by jcp123; Jul 11, 2005 at 01:49 AM.
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 08:35 PM
  #25  
Black4.2's Avatar
Black4.2
Senior User
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 297
Likes: 0
All depends on the application..Tow alot, don't buy a v6 or for that matter a v8..I would go for the 4.9 for that. Works just like a diesel, but altleast it might get better fuel economy..if it comes to daily commuting, I'd want the v6. I never like taking my 4.9 over 65....
 
Reply
Old Jul 11, 2005 | 10:54 PM
  #26  
Schmids4.9l's Avatar
Schmids4.9l
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,611
Likes: 0
From: Bored town OH
Originally Posted by Black4.2
All depends on the application..Tow alot, don't buy a v6 or for that matter a v8..I would go for the 4.9 for that. Works just like a diesel, but altleast it might get better fuel economy..if it comes to daily commuting, I'd want the v6. I never like taking my 4.9 over 65....
Hell I dont like taking mine over 55. With a C6 you'll have that though. not having overdrive sucks. No high way travel in my truck! Back country roads at 55-60 mph for me. I like keeping the RPMs at around 2000 rpms. and thats perfect too because at 55 mph, with my C6 and 3.08's I turn a little above 2000.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 08:53 PM
  #27  
309Ford's Avatar
309Ford
Senior User
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 154
Likes: 2
I find it odd that you're all so afraid to run your 300's at highway speeds. I have 4.10's on my EFI truck (31 inch tires) and I turn around 2550 at 75 mph in overdrive. That's lower gearing than most of you have. With an overdrive these speeds are no problem, and the torque curve is flat all the way to 3000-3100 rpm.

My older Ford has 3.55's with 31's, and turns 2900 at 75 (no overdrive). This truck has headers, Offy intake and four barrel, with a bump in compression due to milling the head and overboring the cylinders. The ports were smoothed up, but not enlarged, and matched up to the headers. The exhaust goes out dual pipes. In other words, this truck has all the mods needed to make the 300 come alive (it's now a 309) but it still retains its low speed torque-in fact, low speed torque has improved as well. The powerband has fattened up, gaining several hundred rpm up high, and it can easily out lug my EFI truck down low. It runs down the highway at highly illegal speeds like it was nothing (not often, but it can easily do it). This is what a 300 can be.

No need to fear the highway (75+ mph) if the truck has the right gearing or overdrive. My high geared, stock EFI truck can do it no problems. Yours can too.

Of course, if you're towing, lower speeds of around 60 mph are a lot easier on gas and safer too. I'm talking about running empty.
 
Reply
Old Jul 12, 2005 | 08:54 PM
  #28  
optikal illushun's Avatar
optikal illushun
Postmaster
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 3,545
Likes: 4
From: Coal Region
hell i run my 300 at 70-75 all the time. i dont go faster because i dont need to but the mudders dont like it either.
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 07:41 AM
  #29  
DeepRoots's Avatar
DeepRoots
Posting Guru
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,051
Likes: 0
From: Douglas, Georgia
both of my trucks have stock tire sizes and c6 tranny's
3,300 is the gov speed on the 7.3, on the 4.9 75 miles per hour isn't a problem, course the F150 4.9 have 2.73 gears
 
Reply
Old Jul 13, 2005 | 08:28 AM
  #30  
DT 466Man's Avatar
DT 466Man
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,454
Likes: 1
From: Adams TN
I won't run mine over 67. with 4.10's and no overdrive that's 3k. i've had it up to 85 once but i was in a hurry.

DT
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:19 PM.

story-0
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-2
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-6
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-7
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-8
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-9
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE