Using dynosim 2000
Thread Starter
|
Freshman User
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 33
Likes: 0
Using dynosim 2000
Friend of mine showed me this program, has anyone used it? Is it fairly accurate? I have dialed in what seems to be the correct specs for the stock 302 in the truck right now. I input all the cam specs, and cylinder head specs and I kind of fudged with the intake setup, as you aren't able to be very precise there it seems. I have 540cfm with dual-plane manifold. Also I have the cam set to 'roller-solid or hydraulic lifters'.
I believe most of the data should be correct, the hp and torque curves look right.
When entering new combos, there's some ambiguity on how to set the intake to resemble other manifolds. Basically the program asks you to choose the type of the manifold, from: single-plane, dual-plane, tunnel-ram, individual-runner, tuned port, sequential fire, or use forced induction. Then you choose the cfm it flows @ x.xx inHg (whatever that means
).
Using those perameters, what would a ford explorer intake or gt-40 intake, or edelbrock performer truck intake most resemble?
I believe most of the data should be correct, the hp and torque curves look right.
When entering new combos, there's some ambiguity on how to set the intake to resemble other manifolds. Basically the program asks you to choose the type of the manifold, from: single-plane, dual-plane, tunnel-ram, individual-runner, tuned port, sequential fire, or use forced induction. Then you choose the cfm it flows @ x.xx inHg (whatever that means
).Using those perameters, what would a ford explorer intake or gt-40 intake, or edelbrock performer truck intake most resemble?
Last edited by VectorFord; May 3, 2005 at 01:50 AM.
