SVT Tsunami
Thread Starter
|
Posting Guru
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
From: York, NE
SVT Tsunami
Wht do you think.
Supercharged 6.8L V-10, 512 HP, 640 ft-lbs
http://www.gearfx.com/temp/detnews/B...?truckblog.com
I like this part:
"This powerplant, also slated for use in the next generation Lightning, is more than adequate for propelling Ford's largest and heaviest weapon."
Supercharged 6.8L V-10, 512 HP, 640 ft-lbs
http://www.gearfx.com/temp/detnews/B...?truckblog.com
I like this part:
"This powerplant, also slated for use in the next generation Lightning, is more than adequate for propelling Ford's largest and heaviest weapon."
Senior User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Why? That would be an awesome powerplant in the Lightning, but why burden it with a 7,000 pound Super Duty chassis? SVT is supposed to be about total performance, and I don't see this thing fulfilling the SVT requirements. Personally, I hope this is just a test bed for the new Lightning powerplant.
I don't get it?
I don't get it?
Posting Guru
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,079
Likes: 0
I second the above statement!
and repeat the one i posted from another topic.
In a F350 platform. Is ford on drugs? That weight is going to kill it. Since when has the Superduty been great at road manors not to mention handeling and superduty remind me of government and worker. Can you say oximoron?
and repeat the one i posted from another topic.
In a F350 platform. Is ford on drugs? That weight is going to kill it. Since when has the Superduty been great at road manors not to mention handeling and superduty remind me of government and worker. Can you say oximoron?
Lead Driver
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 6,175
Likes: 21
From: Texas
It's almost like an article form The Onion. I can't believe ford would actually name a vehicle "Tsunami" after recent events.
I don't understand why they would go through all this while the Diesel's are getting so much HP hype and a lot better mileage. This looks like a waste of Ford resources to me. They need to be developing a ~3.0 liter diesel to put in the 1/2 tons, Rangers and SUVs that will get 25+ mpg. This is almost Dodge silly.
I don't understand why they would go through all this while the Diesel's are getting so much HP hype and a lot better mileage. This looks like a waste of Ford resources to me. They need to be developing a ~3.0 liter diesel to put in the 1/2 tons, Rangers and SUVs that will get 25+ mpg. This is almost Dodge silly.
New User
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
This truck was an APRIL FOOLS JOKE ... the guy who did it runs the gear fx website and if you look around on there he is pretty big onto computers so it wouldnt be much of a stretch for him to photochop that tease of a truck.
Trending Topics
Posting Guru
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 1,921
Likes: 0
From: central TX
"It's almost like an article form The Onion. I can't believe ford would actually name a vehicle "Tsunami" after recent events. "
I agree, I'm this close (-) to calling shenanigans based on the name alone.
I agree, I'm this close (-) to calling shenanigans based on the name alone.
FTE Stories
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Top 6 Best Deals Available on New Fords & Lincolns Right Now
Brett Foote
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Verdad Gallardo
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals
Joe Kucinski
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership
Brett Foote
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches
Pouria Savadkouei
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained
Brett Foote
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love
Joe Kucinski
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)
Michael S. Palmer
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Verdad Gallardo
Freshman User
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
SVT Tsunami is definately an april fools joke. Check out the link below. Does the picture in the corner look familiar?
http://www.car-data.com/xpage.reviews/rp.template.asp?mfg=ford&model=superduty&writer=cw
http://www.car-data.com/xpage.reviews/rp.template.asp?mfg=ford&model=superduty&writer=cw
Former Vendor
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,362
Likes: 3
From: Hendersonville, NC
Originally Posted by BigF350
Hmmm, it will be interesting to see if anything will be offered as a performance variant on the SuperDuty frame though...
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 18,787
Likes: 30
From: Melbourne, Aus
Good point.
I was thinking it would be nice though if the Harley Davidson trucks had a little extra hp...
Just bump up the boost on the 6.4 a little over the regular engine, and advance the timing on the V10 so that it runs best on premium, but still runs on regular as well without pinging.
And drop the 5.4l on that spec as well.
I was thinking it would be nice though if the Harley Davidson trucks had a little extra hp...
Just bump up the boost on the 6.4 a little over the regular engine, and advance the timing on the V10 so that it runs best on premium, but still runs on regular as well without pinging.
And drop the 5.4l on that spec as well.
