Math question
But the point is that instead of 3 x 9 = 27, + 2 = 29, the truth is (in regards to this problem) $25 + $3 = $28, plus the other 2 stolen dollars. So in the end, the 3 x 9 + 2 just won't add up to $30 no matter how you do it.
$30 paid.
$25 Acutal cost of room due to discount
$5 owed
$1 dollar to each
$2 for the clerk.
The mythical figure of $27 ASSUMES that the cost of the room was actually $27 due to the refund of $1 per man (it should have been 25 due to the multiple occupant discount, The number 27 was never mentioned by "motel personel"). Look only at the original price and the actual discount price of $30 and $25 respectively. If you do that, the math should make sense
30 dollars paid
25 dollars actual cost of room
5 Dollars total refund
3 dollars total to the salesmen
2 dollars to the clerk
Hence an algebraic formula ((30-5)+3)+2)=30
(25+3)+2=30
28+2=30
Or:
x=$30, total paid by salesmen
y=$25 cost of room with multiple occupancy discount
z=$5 Total amount of refund due salesmen
a=$2 Amount kept by clerk
b=$3 Actual amount refunded to salesmen
Which gives you (((x-z)+b)+a)=x
Now isn't that much simpler?
BTW, Countrysweetie, You nailed FWIW
Last edited by tkd; Mar 17, 2005 at 11:34 PM.
The 3 guys pay the hotel
Hotel - $30
Guys - $0
Bell Boy - $0
___________
Total - $30
The hotel gives $5 to the Bell Boy to give back to the guys
Hotel - $25
Guys - $0
Bell Boy - $5
___________
Total - $30
The Bell Boy gives the guys $3 back and keeps $2
Hotel - $25
Guys - $3
Bell Boy - $2
___________
Total - $30
So as you can see, there is no extra dollar 25 + 3 +2 = 30
And you can see that the guys started out with $30 and ended up with $3, so they paid $27
the day clerk came out on top for this one. the salesmen got swindled hahaha!!! I think the real point to this thing is that how crappy a 25 dollar room a night w/ three dudes in it is.
They actually paid $27 ($30 - $3 refund)
They were supposed to pay $25, with the addition of the $2 to the nite clerk it cost $27.
$25 - Base cost of room
$2 - Nite clerk
=$27 total paid (i.e. 3 x $9)
The extra $3 got refunded to the guys, the trick is with the wording, attempting everyone to think that it was $27 + the $2 nite clerk.
When in reality it is $27 INCLUDING the $2. The other $3 was refunded to the guys.
And yes Dennis, I am up for this Funtest.
Cost of Room=$25
Money Refunded=$3
Money Taken by bell hop=$2
Reading the arguement
over this confusing question
=priceless
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
Each man pays $9, $10 - $1 refund 3x9=27
Bell hop gets $2 tip
27+2 = $29
Revalation, thats how they figure taxes outa my pay check!
I'm goin to get even, wheres my prybar.
Think of it as customers on one side, and hotel and staff on the other.
$30 (paid) - $3 (refund rec'd) = $30 (rec'd by clerk) - $5 (paid by clerk) + $5 (rec'd by bell boy) - $3 (paid by bell boy), which (do the math) reduces to:
$27 (paid) = $25 (rec'd by clerk) + $2 (rec'd by bell boy)
The guys each paid $10 and got $1 back, so their total expenditure is $27. Period. No more. The room cost $25, so they should have each received a refund of $1.66 2/3, but instead, the bell boy kept the $0.66 2/3 from each of the guys and only gave them $1 each. 3 x $0.66 2/3 = $2. In the end, the guys paid $27: $25 to the hotel and an unknown-to-the-guys tip of $2 to the bell boy. The wording of the problem leads you to add the $2 to the $25 twice, and then ask where the extra dollar went, instead of adding $2 then $3 to the $25. It's a play on a person's desire to not work in fractional dollars and cents. Each guy had the following cash:
$10 (cash in pocket)
-$10 (original payment to hotel clerk)
+$1.66 2/3(amount of refund)
-$0.66 2/3(unknown tip to bell boy)
----------
$1.00 (cash in pocket after all transactions)
The last two transactions were undertaken by the bell boy FOR them, so they only saw one combined transaction of $1.00.
If you still don't understand it, ask an accountant to set up the t-charts for you to show you all the appropriate transactions, both the debits and the credits for everyone involved. D-ranged2.5 listed something very close.
Jason
Last edited by jroehl; Mar 24, 2005 at 07:51 AM.










