Notices
1997 - 2003 F150 1997-2003 F150, 1997-1999 F250LD, 7700 & 2004 F150 Heritage
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Auxito

4.2-? engine conversion

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 09:01 PM
  #1  
mr_jake07's Avatar
mr_jake07
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
4.2-? engine conversion

Ive got many plans for my receantly purchased 97' F 150. One of which is to increase engine size from a 4.2 V6. Ive been eye ballen some larger options and was wondering which would be best for for my application. A 351 w (www.fordcobraengines.com) , 460 super cobra jet (www.fordracing.com),or other? Also what about engine mounts?
 
Reply
Old Jan 16, 2005 | 10:42 PM
  #2  
Racerguy's Avatar
Racerguy
Hotshot
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 12,679
Likes: 14
From: BC, Canada
Hi and welcome to FTE

Neither engine is going to be really easy to swap in but a 351 would be easier than a 460.
Take a look at https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/s...highlight=302+
 
Reply
Old Jan 17, 2005 | 12:50 AM
  #3  
mr_jake07's Avatar
mr_jake07
Thread Starter
|
New User
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
about how long would it take to swap. with a turn key engine you think?
 
Reply
Old Jan 18, 2005 | 10:54 PM
  #4  
xxdemon's Avatar
xxdemon
New User
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 4
I've put a 302 in my 97. I had a 4.2 V6 that had the dreaded intake gasket leak that got a rod. As far as the actual install goes, the engine sits in very nicely. You can use motor mounts from a 69 Mustang and cut your stock frame mounts down or make some more from square stock. I kept the fuel injection from the HO motor and that was the biggest problem with the time it took to get the truck done. If you're going to put a high horsepower windsor motor in it, you'd be ahead of the game by putting in a beefier transmission if it is a 5 speed. The HO 5.0 is about all I'd put in front of the stock 5 speed.
 
Reply
Old Jan 19, 2005 | 08:52 PM
  #5  
AlfredB1979's Avatar
AlfredB1979
Posting Guru
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,978
Likes: 1
From: Alvin, Texas.
Go for an Exploder engine. They had 302s in them starting from 1996, and they have good heads and a pretty good cam in them. I have heard of no factory 351s getting that treatment and Exploder 302s are OBD2 as well, eliminating some wiring hassles.

Of course, the easiest would be another factory option, like a 4.6 or 5.4L...
 
Reply
Old Mar 15, 2006 | 10:14 PM
  #6  
Okie97's Avatar
Okie97
New User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
302 Auto?

Has anyone tried to put a 302 in front of a 97 4R70W automatic?
 
Reply
Old Mar 16, 2006 | 12:57 AM
  #7  
ford390gashog's Avatar
ford390gashog
Fleet Owner
20 Year Member
Liked
Loved
Community Favorite
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 26,007
Likes: 573
From: Brentwood,CA
Club FTE Gold Member
the bell housing patterns are different.
 
Reply
Old Mar 20, 2006 | 04:53 PM
  #8  
Okie97's Avatar
Okie97
New User
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Question

I'm fairly sure that the 4.2 V6 kept the same bolt pattern as the 302 (4.6 and 5.4 are definitely different). I don't know if the 302 flexplate will work with the 4R70W torque converter. Anyone know?
 
Reply




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:37 AM.