Turbo???

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #61  
Old 02-04-2005, 07:42 AM
Cracker289's Avatar
Cracker289
Cracker289 is offline
Fleet Mechanic
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Four Oaks, NC
Posts: 1,994
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 8 Posts
Velocity is volume * speed, and the pressure is what forces the speed of the exhaust. So locating the turbo at point where exahust velocity is greatest would provide the best ratio of boost to backpressure.

How long is the intake tract in a configuration like that? If you had to pressurize an extra 8 feet of 3 inch tubing, that is a lot compared to maybe 2 or 3 feet in most conventional setups.

But if the combination works for him and he's happy with it, more power to him! Even if it's not the most optimum setup I'm sure it's twice as good as it ever was stock.
 
  #62  
Old 02-04-2005, 08:55 AM
ranger240's Avatar
ranger240
ranger240 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tuttle, Oklahoma
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
put your hand over your exhaust tip, you can actually seal it tight for a little bit.
now try to seal your hand over the exhaust manifold outlet (hypothetically) you wouldn't be able to seal it off due to the pressure coming out of the motor. there is a pressure loss from one end to the other, and I am sure spool time would be much greater than if it were mounted traditionally. your charge piping will also prevent quick spool time. for instance. pressurize a 240z bottle with lung power, usually takes one breath. now do the same with a 2 litre bottle, it'll take atleast three good breaths. this is exagerated turbo lag. I look at it like this, you are going to have to plumb all that charge piping, and it costs money, just spend that money on an intake manifold, and get better performance. you can build your own system which (on a 2.4 litre nissan engine) can make 250 hp, that's about 150 over stock, for about $1800. and you can look good doing it. I know I wouldn't want my intake system hanging under my car where rocks, animals, and whatever other road debris can punch a hole, and send garbage into my engine, or turbo.

sorry for such a long reply, I hope someone gets something useful out of it.
 
  #63  
Old 02-04-2005, 11:36 AM
Spaznaut's Avatar
Spaznaut
Spaznaut is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: NE Tennessee
Posts: 1,275
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
The reason you want a cooler intake charge is not so much density but detonation. Too much heat leads to early detonation. Cooler air = more boost you can safely apply. The fuel also acts as a coolant. You'll need to upgrade the ignition so the air rushing in doesn't 'blow out' the spark on you. Most supercharged, blown applications have a smaller gap on the spark plugs. You'll have to upgrade the fuel delivery and the carburator. I think Holley and a few others sell 'Blow-thru' carbs. You have to be able to supply one extra psi of fuel for each extra psi of boost. You want 14psi fuel at 7psi boost.

Twin turbos are used to lessen turbo lag. You can use 2 smaller turbos than one big one to supply the same psi and volume. Smaller turbos spool quicker. Call a good turbo or superchager supplier for good info. They deal with em every day and can give you much better info for what your wanting. Street driving, racing, or weekend warrior. Good luck with it.

I want a Kenny Bell or such on my truck More low end for the bigger vehicle.
 
  #64  
Old 02-04-2005, 11:52 AM
samwe's Avatar
samwe
samwe is offline
Mountain Pass
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Eagle River, Ak
Posts: 233
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by stevef100s
Velocity, not pressure, is what spins the turbo. The turbo spinning then CREATES
pressure in the form of boost. The exhaust velocity is the speed of the exhaust exiting the exhaust system. How can it slow down? If the exhaust moved slower at the end of the exhaust system then at the beginning, then it would eventually build up, and choke off the engine. True, the volume is a little less, since the cooler molecules are more dense, but the measurable velocity can't change. Think about this one, too. What would spin a turbine better? Less dense warm air, or more dense cool air?
The the pressure differential on each side of the turbine is what spins it, not the velocity.
Increased density and slower velocity does not mean the exhaust would build up. Think of the freeway. If teh cars are closer together and going slower couldn't the same number of cars pass teh same spot per hour as when they are farther apart and going faster?
Physics really isn't that hard.
 
  #65  
Old 02-04-2005, 02:09 PM
ranger240's Avatar
ranger240
ranger240 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Tuttle, Oklahoma
Posts: 693
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by samwe
The the pressure differential on each side of the turbine is what spins it, not the velocity.
Increased density and slower velocity does not mean the exhaust would build up. Think of the freeway. If teh cars are closer together and going slower couldn't the same number of cars pass teh same spot per hour as when they are farther apart and going faster?
Physics really isn't that hard.
haha, but then again, couldn't the slow people just pay more attention and go faster? haha and when there is a crash do they call that turbulance? ahahaha

sorry, I had to go there.

_Ken
 
  #66  
Old 02-04-2005, 03:35 PM
falcor1's Avatar
falcor1
falcor1 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: lawrence
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
the turbo systems i've used have a small entry point on it to apply gear oil every 10 or 15k miles.
 
  #67  
Old 02-04-2005, 06:14 PM
PyroBob's Avatar
PyroBob
PyroBob is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Ballard, WA
Posts: 376
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Opinion of a Mechanical Engineer with an option in Gas Jet Turbines:

PV=mRT <-- The higher the temperature, the greater the volume and pressure...as the air cools, farther down the exhaust, its velocity and pressure will decrease, because its temperature decreases at the same time...no mass is added, and R is always constant, its a law!

Turbos are mounted as close to the engine as possible, because the hot, fast moving air will spin them up faster then the denser air at the end of the pipe...the only flaw is that hotter air on the compressor side, is more heat transferred to the intake side. Putting a turbo farther down on the exhaust (ie replacing the muffler) would work, however you would either need a smaller turbo, or you could be facing surge issues (pressure against the turbo only builds enough to spin it intermittently, letting gasses pass, but not building boost.)

So basically, most of your descriptions are correct, you guys just have to add them all together!

The moral of the story is any design is possible, you just need to make sure to properly size your turbo to your situation...if space requires you to mount it towards the rear of the vehicle, you are best off using a smaller turbo (preferably twins on a dual exhaust), or, if the fabrication is too outrageous, a twin screw/roots blower (my opinion is too avoid centrifigal at all cost, as they are misleading in thier claims to power.)

Welp, that about says it.
 
  #68  
Old 02-04-2005, 06:19 PM
stevef100s's Avatar
stevef100s
stevef100s is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Destin/Ft. Walton Beach,
Posts: 1,099
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I concur with Pyro, but I do want to show proof of what spins the turbo. The following was copied from a Volvo turbocharged car manual............
The flow of exhaust gas turns the exhaust turbine (1), driving the connected compressor turbine (2) which draws in filtered ambient air, compresses it, and forces it into combustion chambers via the intake manifold. At low-load the engine does not create the exhaust gas velocity necessary to drive the exhaust turbine. At high-load, however, accelerating exhaust gas velocities propel the turbines to 120,000 rpm to create full boost.
 

Last edited by stevef100s; 02-04-2005 at 06:58 PM.
  #69  
Old 02-05-2005, 11:30 PM
StreetCruiser's Avatar
StreetCruiser
StreetCruiser is offline
New User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Texas
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I understand why a turbo works, and why the closer it is to the engine, the better, but still. A proper sized turbo remote mounted works plain and simple. There are many guys on ls1tech with HUGE numbers with STS kits. Mine is a little different, cause my turbo is right where the factory Y pipe in on the F150, not where the muffler is. The key to any setup is a proper A/R turbine, and you have to pay attention on a remote kit.
 
  #70  
Old 02-06-2005, 12:30 AM
'961506's Avatar
'961506
'961506 is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: P-Town, CA
Posts: 631
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
falcor, what brand of turbos do you use?
 
  #71  
Old 04-23-2005, 10:02 AM
falcor1's Avatar
falcor1
falcor1 is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: lawrence
Posts: 71
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
there is a couple of trucks i do the maintainance on which have the international 444,also known as the 7.3 liter diesel.all but one of these engines are turbo.the turbos are mounted on top of the engine and are conected to the exhaust from the driver side manifold.there is no connection to the engine oil system.instead they have a container kind of like a small power steering fluid container on the front of the engine that is connected to a belt.only the turbo isn't belt driven,it's powered by the exhaust.the oil for the turbo is checked every couple of weeks,and filled as needed.it isn't hard to manufacture if you have the right parts,tools,and experience.
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mustangsvo85
Supercharger, Turbocharger, Nitrous Oxide & Water/Methanol Injection
25
03-03-2016 07:08 PM
bobby22m
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
7
11-05-2013 09:29 PM
Psalm116
Pre-Power Stroke Diesel (7.3L IDI & 6.9L)
11
03-06-2013 09:33 AM
monwv04
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
13
04-07-2011 08:45 PM
Supercab
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
23
10-01-2009 07:08 PM



Quick Reply: Turbo???



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:41 PM.