engine room in '66

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #1  
Old 01-05-2005, 11:17 PM
Shanhalt14's Avatar
Shanhalt14
Shanhalt14 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
engine room in '66

Is there enough room in the engine compartment of a 1966 Ranchero for a 302?.....or at least a 289?
 
  #2  
Old 01-05-2005, 11:48 PM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,876
Received 1,596 Likes on 1,301 Posts
Yes, the '66 is the last Falcon based Ranchero and came stock with 289s.
302's are the same size block, so they fit too.

351 W is a question mark, and would be tight as it has a taller deck and header or manifold clearance becomes an issue.

FE motors won't fit without surgery, and unless you're building a drag racer with a serious FE, aren't an option.

429 or 460 slides right in after a bit of trimming with the gas ax as well.

The other option, heresy to most here, would be a small block chev. Pony up $20K and get one of those new 427 jobs. Only about 100lbs heavier than the 302 and big block power. Just think, you'd have the only one.
 
  #3  
Old 01-06-2005, 08:01 AM
Shanhalt14's Avatar
Shanhalt14
Shanhalt14 is offline
New User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I got mine, it had a 200 in it. Were there two stock engines for this year?
 
  #4  
Old 01-06-2005, 08:28 AM
65rancheroguy's Avatar
65rancheroguy
65rancheroguy is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Union Grove, Alabama
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Shanhalt14
Is there enough room in the engine compartment of a 1966 Ranchero for a 302?.....or at least a 289?
YES!
They came from the factory with an optional V-8.
 
  #5  
Old 01-06-2005, 11:36 AM
85e150's Avatar
85e150
85e150 is offline
Super Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 31,876
Received 1,596 Likes on 1,301 Posts
Originally Posted by Shanhalt14
When I got mine, it had a 200 in it. Were there two stock engines for this year?
The 200 was probably the "standard" engine.
289 2v, 289 4v were optional, the 289 Hi-Po might have been an option as well.
 
  #6  
Old 01-11-2005, 08:34 AM
Pam's Red's Avatar
Pam's Red
Pam's Red is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Front Range of Colorado
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The 66 will take a 351W without engine compartment mods, I am planning on putting one I have back together and dropping it in when the weather warms up.
Pam
 
  #7  
Old 01-26-2005, 09:37 PM
Bulldawg1081's Avatar
Bulldawg1081
Bulldawg1081 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Tulia, Texas
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
66 ranchero question

i have a 1966 falcon ranchero pickup that still has the origional factory 200 inline with the 3 on the tree...i have an 302 and a c-4 tranny out of a 1982 ford full size van that id really like to put in it but i hear that there is alot of modifying to get it to fit,what all would i have to do to install the 302? any answers would be greatly appreciated
 
  #8  
Old 01-28-2005, 02:15 PM
65rancheroguy's Avatar
65rancheroguy
65rancheroguy is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Union Grove, Alabama
Posts: 52
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Bulldawg1081
i have a 1966 falcon ranchero pickup that still has the origional factory 200 inline with the 3 on the tree...i have an 302 and a c-4 tranny out of a 1982 ford full size van that id really like to put in it but i hear that there is alot of modifying to get it to fit,what all would i have to do to install the 302? any answers would be greatly appreciated
Try looking at your other thread! Why ask the same thing twice on the same forum?
 




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:29 AM.