Notices
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel 2003 - 2007 F250, F350 pickup and F350+ Cab Chassis, 2003 - 2005 Excursion and 2003 - 2009 van

Fuel Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #1  
NiNjA DoC's Avatar
NiNjA DoC
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Sin City
Fuel Question

Does anyone know what would happen if you put the military diesel fuel, JP 5 or 8 or whatever its called, what it would do. is it any better then #2 fuel? or what the difference is?
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 02:34 PM
  #2  
RJB1's Avatar
RJB1
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
IT SHOULD ALSO BE NOTED THAT DIESEL ENGINE FUEL FILTER PLUGGING
PROBLEMS MAY OCCUR AT INSTALLATIONS UNDERGOING INITIAL CONVERSION
FROM DIESEL TO JP8. KEROSENE BASED JP8 HAS A SOLVENT CLEANSING
ACTION ON ENGINE FUEL SYSTEMS FORMERLY IN DIESEL SERVICE. THIS
SITUATION SHOULD IMPROVE AFTER PURGING WITH SUBSEQUENT LOADS OF JP8
AND ENGINE FUEL FILTER REPLACEMENT AS NECESSARY.

From an army document on running JP8 in Diesel engines
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #3  
Frobozz's Avatar
Frobozz
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
There's also that whole road tax problem...

(I bet they don't dye the military fuel though?)

Duncan
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 02:42 PM
  #4  
jackofalltrades's Avatar
jackofalltrades
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: Lynden, WA.
Without more research, I would think that running Jp5/8 aviation jet fuels, would be worse than running #1 Diesel for extended periods, for lack of lubricity. JP8 actually mixes with water.

https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/s...d.php?t=317027

http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuel.../L2_2_5_fs.htm

http://www.mobil.com/USA-English/GFM..._Fuels_FAQ.asp


 

Last edited by jackofalltrades; Dec 20, 2004 at 02:51 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 02:47 PM
  #5  
Frobozz's Avatar
Frobozz
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,011
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jackofalltrades
Without more research, I would think that running Jp5/8 aviation jet fuels, would be worse than running home heating oil for extended periods, for lack of lubricity. JP8 actually mixes with water.
But the military is standardizing on whichever JPx fuel it is, so they can run everything on a single fuel. Wouldn't it make sense for them to add lubricity enhancers to it? After all they don't want excessive injection system wear any more than you or I do. If it really has the lubricity of kerosene, then I have a suggestion to make to the military to slash their vehicle repair budget! (And make someone like Stanadyne very happy in the process...)

Duncan
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 02:53 PM
  #6  
NiNjA DoC's Avatar
NiNjA DoC
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
From: Sin City
ok but arent all the HUMVEE, 5,7 ton etc... vehicles diesel powered and they all use the JP whatever fuel. is it just a more refined diesel fuel or is it a whole different fuel altogether?
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 02:55 PM
  #7  
RJB1's Avatar
RJB1
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
I never filled mine with JP-8. We always used MOGAS (diesel) and yes, it was dyed.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 02:59 PM
  #8  
jackofalltrades's Avatar
jackofalltrades
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 1,016
Likes: 0
From: Lynden, WA.
The reason the I've heard of is that the military is standardizing within the ranks. The Navy, Airforce and Army use different fuel grades. Getting them all on one grade enhances military operations capabilities. I don't know that they're interested in making things last... Every engine in the military is on a strict maintenance plan. Before something is worn out, it's replaced with something more high tech. It's the Bic Lighter plan. Only salty dogs and war veterans use a refillable Zippo.

 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 03:01 PM
  #9  
RJB1's Avatar
RJB1
Elder User
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 508
Likes: 0
From: Colorado
It is all logistics. Move/store one fuel to run everything from tent heaters to trucks to aircraft. It is a NATO initiative also, so all nations can refuel no matter where they are in the battle space.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 03:07 PM
  #10  
Daryl Hunter's Avatar
Daryl Hunter
Cargo Master
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 2,203
Likes: 0
From: Carlsbad, California
They are even working a diesel dual sport (on/off road) motorcycle
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #11  
IB Tim's Avatar
IB Tim
FTE Leadership Emeritus
20 Year Member
Veteran: Air Force
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 161,999
Likes: 75
From: 3rd Rock
Club FTE Gold Member
Bob is spot on..they are tying this with the JSF..... The idea that we will need to be capable of participating in many campaigns… on numerous continents, is extremely taxing, it is the same principle as using NATO ammunition….more commonality means less supply line problems, one reason we went to 9mm side arms.
 
Reply
Old Dec 20, 2004 | 08:09 PM
  #12  
me1mckee's Avatar
me1mckee
Senior User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 450
Likes: 0
From: TEXAS
I worked on F-18's for five years in the Marine Corps and we used JP-5 in them. When we went to Air Force bases, they had JP-8 only and it caused more internal wear in the engines and actually made the EGT's higher on start up and high power. We had to mix it up now and then and fly the jets back to a Navy/ Marine Corps base for JP-5 to keep the lubricity up. Also, we kept the excess fuel that we drained out for maintenance in tanks and used it to fill up the generators and hydraulic power units that had 4-53 and 6-71 detroit diesel engines that had no modifications and they ran great all the time.Granted they are 2 cycle diesels, so that may make a difference. This fuel was not dyed by the way and could be found in some diesel trucks on base (I did not have one then).
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 09:18 AM
  #13  
kw5413's Avatar
kw5413
Post Fiend
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 19,098
Likes: 8
From: Great State of Texas
Does anyone know what would happen if you put the military diesel fuel, JP 5 or 8 or whatever its called, what it would do. is it any better then #2 fuel? or what the difference is?

It will put you in jail if used in a POV.
<!-- / message --><!-- sig -->
 
Reply
Old Dec 21, 2004 | 11:46 AM
  #14  
Dads 66's Avatar
Dads 66
Junior User
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Spring Valley Ca
I'm stationed aboard a Diesel propelled ship and we carry JP-5, DFM (Diesel Fuel Marine) F-76 or equivilant to #2 Diesel. JP-5 is primarily used for Helo's and F-76 is used for Main propulsion and Diesel Generators. The rule is we can downgrade JP-5 to use for diesels but we cannot upgrade DFM. Marine units sometimes carry JP-4 which is not allowed aboard ship unless special provisions are made due to the flash Point being lower than the Minimum of 140 Deg. F. We run JP-5 in small craft all of the time with no negative results. Studies have been done to prove the lubricating issues are not a problem.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
staps081
1999 - 2016 Super Duty
2
Aug 5, 2010 07:37 PM
speedracn81
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
27
Dec 8, 2009 02:06 PM
jeff wilson
6.4L Power Stroke Diesel
1
Dec 1, 2007 02:53 PM
88763739
1999 - 2003 7.3L Power Stroke Diesel
12
Sep 5, 2007 05:40 PM
lpbaca
6.0L Power Stroke Diesel
11
Mar 29, 2005 08:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:33 PM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE