Notices
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 1987 - 1996 Ford F-150, F-250, F-350 and larger pickups - including the 1997 heavy-duty F250/F350+ trucks

Trouble with reading codes

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 12:47 PM
  #1  
mike L's Avatar
mike L
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: va
Trouble with reading codes

Wont start. Put in a new rebuilt eec-iv in my 1987 f150 4.9 EFI. When i add a little starting fluid or raw fuel it will only run for 5 to 10 secs each try. I get sweeps on my volt meter ( memery codes ) 11 1 11 11 11 11 1111 then i think it repeats then stops. Does this mean 11 all ok because the truck didn't run?
Thanks
Mike
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 02:38 PM
  #2  
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
EPNCSU2006
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 40
From: Concord, NC
It means it hasn't had time to store any codes in the memory. There has to be some other problem other than the computer if it still won't start. It is promising that you are getting codes out of it this time though. Make sure timing is correct, and that you are getting correct fuel pressure at the fuel rail.
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 02:48 PM
  #3  
guzzler96's Avatar
guzzler96
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 537
Likes: 2
From: Alabama
Lightbulb

11 and 111 are codes for System Pass I believe. I get an 11 code on mine when I do a KOEO test and then my reader goes into the continuous memory codes, which I believe are codes generated while driving that the computer records. When I do a KOER test, the engine runs thru a sequence of controlling all the different components of the engine,e.g. idle,etc., my reader prompts me to depress the throttle to the floor at one point, depress and release the brake pedal at one point and turn the steering all the way to the right and back to center at one point and then starts to read the engine running codes. I guess what I am getting at is, if the engine will not run long enough to generate any codes you won't see any.
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #4  
mike L's Avatar
mike L
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: va
Thanks, I think its a problem with fuel, I have fuel to the rail though. I disconnect the fuel line in front of the fuel filter and it pumps with both tanks. How do you read this set of sweps? Does it says code 11? Do you count the one sweep and the four sweep? Why does it repeat 11 four times?
11 1 11 11 11 11 1111
mike
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 03:14 PM
  #5  
qman's Avatar
qman
Cargo Master
20 Year Member
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,687
Likes: 6
this'll explain it:

http://fordfuelinjection.com/index.php?p=13
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 03:22 PM
  #6  
guzzler96's Avatar
guzzler96
Elder User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 537
Likes: 2
From: Alabama
Lightbulb

I know on my reader it generates a separator code between the actual codes it is reading. I am wondering if you could be seeing an 11 code three times with a separator code of one blink(sweep) between the 11 codes, which would give you (8) blinks(sweeps). Does more time elapse between the first (2) blinks or sweeps and the third sweep or between the fifth and sixth sweeps and the last. I guess you are reading these with an analog multimeter?? Do you have a working check engine light?? I know when I read mine the Malfunction Indicator Light(MIL) or CEL (Check Engine Light) blinks the codes that the reader is reading. I don't know if this would happen if you are reading with an analog multitester too??

guzzler96
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 04:46 PM
  #7  
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
EPNCSU2006
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 40
From: Concord, NC
The output would be 11, 11, 1, 11, 11 for an all clear code. It outputs the continuous codes twice, then a one sweep separator pulse, then the memory codes twice.
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 04:58 PM
  #8  
mike L's Avatar
mike L
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: va
thanks i'll try again.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-3

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-4

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-6

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
story-7

Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-9

The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

 Joe Kucinski
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 11:13 PM
  #9  
mike L's Avatar
mike L
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: va
codes

I did the codes for the fun of it. It only ran total about 20 sconds on starter fluid. Codes i got were (sweeps from my volt meter)
11 then 1 sec pause
1 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
11 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
1111 then 4 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
1 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
11 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
1111 then 6 sec pause
1 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
1 then 2 sec pause
11 then 2 sec pause
11 stop for good. I removed the key then waiting 20 sec then re tried for trouble codes. Did 10 times always the same. I had the clutch in, everything off, park brake on and in nutrel. To me it looks like 21, 222 or 212,22 then 12, 122 or 121 and 22. I read codes i went to fordfuelinjection.com and the Haynes and it's not easy. This can't be just 11, 111 can it?
 
Reply
Old Nov 10, 2004 | 11:44 PM
  #10  
fefarms's Avatar
fefarms
Elder User
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 941
Likes: 4
It takes some real practice to read the codes accurately.

Looks like codes 21, 22, and 24 for KOEO test. The sequence is dumped out twice. Normal behavior for KOEO codes.

Then the lone separator pulse.

Then codes 21 and 22 in continuous memory

Getting codes 21 and 24 in KOEO makes sense. The test is intended to be run with the engine warmed up. If the engine is cold (which it is, because it won't start) it would be considered normal to get code 21 (ECT out of self-test range) and code 24 (IAT out of self test range).

Code 22 (MAP/BARO out of self test range) is a potential problem. The MAP sensor should be indicating 100 percent load factor, since there is no manifold vacuum with the engine not running.

Now on to the continuous memory codes.

Code 22 has the same meaning as a continuous memory code as it does as a KOEO code. If your MAP sensor is dead (not oscillating), then it would be reasonable to see a code 22 and the PCM mixture control would have to revert to a guess based on TPS. MAP problems may be the source of your fouled spark plugs and failure to start.

Code 21 is not listed as a continuous memory code, so that one I can't explain.

Your reportage would make more sense if it went something like

11 then 1 sec pause
1 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
11 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
1111 then 4 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
1 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
11 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
1111 then 6 sec pause
1 then 6 second pause
11 then 1 second pause
11 then 2 second pause
11 then 1 second pause
11 stop for good.

This would be code 21, 22, 24 in KOEO and code 22 in continuous memory. Both KOEO and continuous memory codes are normally repeated. I'd ignore the code 21 and 24, and focus in on the code 22 as a MAP problem.

One piece of good news is that the PCM is no longer brain dead and is capable of dumping out codes. Furthermore, most of the codes make sense.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 12:45 AM
  #11  
mike L's Avatar
mike L
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: va
reading codes

Thanks! I'll check again, I think that's what it was cm 22 then 22. If the CM codes were 21,22. I saw code 21 in KOEO, it was (key on engine off).
Will also check the map voltage tomarrow for voltage.
Mike
 

Last edited by mike L; Nov 11, 2004 at 01:05 AM.
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 02:00 PM
  #12  
mike L's Avatar
mike L
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: va
Map Sensor Voltage

I checked in FTE advance search for someone that has the same truck as mine. MAP pluged in I get 0 volts at SIG RTN and 5 volts at MAP PB SIGNAL, and 4.2 volts at VREF. MAP unpluged I get 0 volts at SGN RTN, 4.2 volts at MAP BP SIGNAL and 4.5 at the VREF. Map unpluged I get 4.8 volts from the SIG RTN to VREF. I get 4.8 volts from the SIG RTN to MAP BP SIGNAL. The other truck that I matched my votage to had 2.5 volts at the SIG RTN plugged and unpluged??? He said after testing the MAP he replaed another part and truck runs now. ODD???? I believe you guys said that I needed also to test with a scope or a volt meter with a frequence?? to test it. Also test the Map plugged in, test with a vacuum gauge. Do I need to do this? Add 20 inches of HG with the volt meter on the MP PB SIGNAL and see if it drop to 1 volt?
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 02:56 PM
  #13  
EPNCSU2006's Avatar
EPNCSU2006
Lead Driver
20 Year Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 9,555
Likes: 40
From: Concord, NC
Test for a short (continuity) between VREF and the MAP signal wire to see if the reference voltage is going over there. 2.5V should be the correct reading for the signal wire with the MAP sensor plugged in. Unless of course you have an older style voltage varying MAP sensor, which I'm not familiar with. You said you had the same voltage on the MAP signal wire as you had on the VREF wire when the sensor was unplugged though, which is why I'm thinking there's a short.
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 03:02 PM
  #14  
mike L's Avatar
mike L
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: va
Map sensor

Thanks I'll check again? I found an old post you guys had about testing the Map at https://www.ford-trucks.com/forums/s...34#post2115634
 
Reply
Old Nov 11, 2004 | 04:11 PM
  #15  
mike L's Avatar
mike L
Thread Starter
|
Fleet Mechanic
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 1,552
Likes: 0
From: va
Originally Posted by fefarms
It takes some real practice to read the codes accurately.

Looks like codes 21, 22, and 24 for KOEO test. The sequence is dumped out twice. Normal behavior for KOEO codes.

Then the lone separator pulse.

Then codes 21 and 22 in continuous memory

Getting codes 21 and 24 in KOEO makes sense. The test is intended to be run with the engine warmed up. If the engine is cold (which it is, because it won't start) it would be considered normal to get code 21 (ECT out of self-test range) and code 24 (IAT out of self test range).

Code 22 (MAP/BARO out of self test range) is a potential problem. The MAP sensor should be indicating 100 percent load factor, since there is no manifold vacuum with the engine not running.

Now on to the continuous memory codes.

Code 22 has the same meaning as a continuous memory code as it does as a KOEO code. If your MAP sensor is dead (not oscillating), then it would be reasonable to see a code 22 and the PCM mixture control would have to revert to a guess based on TPS. MAP problems may be the source of your fouled spark plugs and failure to start.

Code 21 is not listed as a continuous memory code, so that one I can't explain.

Your reportage would make more sense if it went something like

11 then 1 sec pause
1 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
11 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
1111 then 4 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
1 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
11 then 2 sec pause
11 then 1 sec pause
1111 then 6 sec pause
1 then 6 second pause
11 then 1 second pause
11 then 2 second pause
11 then 1 second pause
11 stop for good.

This would be code 21, 22, 24 in KOEO and code 22 in continuous memory. Both KOEO and continuous memory codes are normally repeated. I'd ignore the code 21 and 24, and focus in on the code 22 as a MAP problem.

One piece of good news is that the PCM is no longer brain dead and is capable of dumping out codes. Furthermore, most of the codes make sense.
Double checked and thats what I get. CM 22, 22 not 21, 22
 
Reply



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:36 PM.

story-0
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-1
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-2
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-3
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-5
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-6
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE
story-7
Ford Super Duty: 5 Things Owners LOVE, 5 Things They LOATHE!

Slideshow: Ranking the 5 things owners love about their Super Duty and 5 things they don't

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:36:49


VIEW MORE
story-8
Every 2026 Ford Truck Engine RANKED from WORST to FIRST!

Slideshow: Ranking all 12 Ford truck engines available in 2026.

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-04-22 13:32:20


VIEW MORE
story-9
The Best F-150 Deal of Every Trim Level (XL through Raptor)

Slideshow: The best Ford F-150 deal for every trim level (XL through Raptor)

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-21 15:59:01


VIEW MORE