When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
ive had my truck for about a year and was thinking about switching to synthetic oil and had a few questions. the truck is a 2000 f250 with a 5.4 engine. it has 20,000 miles and has always been ran with conventional oil. i would like to switch to mobil one syn. but have heard a lot of people say that it will cause the seals to leak oil, that the oil will leak out of the drain plug, that you cant switch from conventional oil to synthetic after so many miles, that it will void the warranty, etc. others say itll run a lot cleaner, last a lot longer, and that the newer engines are all compatible with synthetic. my only experiece with synthetic was in an 86 ltd crown victoria and it caused it pour oil out everywhere. so im hesitant to use it in a new truck. i would appreciate any help. thanks.
I changed my 97 F250 5.8L to synthetic at 38000mi. That was when I bought it. It now has 90000mi. on it and hasn't leaked a drop. Changed my Mercury Sable at 53000. It now has 61000, same result. If the engine is in good condition, you won't have any problem due to the switch.
If your engine is in good condition with no significant leaks now, synthetic will work fine. If it already leaks, then syn will also leak and cost more.
Way back, at least 10 years probably more like 20, seals and oils etc were different and some people did have problems when switching from dino to syn.
I have never had a problem with syn. All my cars came into my posession with dino in them some as much as 40K miles with dino.
The modern dinos are very good, many are almost syn like. Syn appears to have the edge with temperature extremes and cold flowability. They also look good if you go for extended drains say no more than 7,500 in daily stop and go or tow. Some claim 15K to 25K but when I tried it long ago, the oil looked strange. With dino most people go for 3,000 or maybe 7,500 if they have mostly freeway driving and no tow.
Oil choice still seems very much a religious issue, you believe or you don't.
Good Luck, and change regularly whatever oil you use.
20,000 miles is still new. There is no way that the seals are bad already, and if they are you are still under warranty.
I do have a problem with switching to synthetic with over 100,000 miles. My BMW uses three times as much oil (not external leakage) on Syntec than it did with Delo.
I switched from Motorcraft 5wx20 semi synthetic to Amsoil series 2000 synthetic 0w-30 at about 30,000 miles. I did not flush the engine when I did this and now have 97,000 on the F150 and quite happy that I did so. Mobil 1, Royal Purple, Red Line should all give the same results. There is no way that mineral oil will equal the performance of synthetic....ask any Petro-Chemical Engineer
Not from the UOA's I've seen. Myself, and many other members on this board, have been getting results that are nothing less than spectacular from plain conventional oil. I see no reason to spend more money.
OBTW, 3 posts, cheerleading for Amsoil... You aren't an Amsoil dealer are you?
Could anyone explain to me the resistance of some to use a full synthetic oil. I'm new here but have read some posts that use cost as the determining factor although they do not think twice about having a $20.00 oil analysis done on inexpensive mineral oil.
It is a cost issue primarily. If I could buy full Group IV syn for $0.80/qt., I'd be using it.
Contrary to what you might surmise from my various posts on the subject, I do not object to anyone using a syn. If they want to spend the money, good for them.
What I object to is the "Churchlady" superiority attitude that some syn. users seem to develop. The suggestion is that I am stupid and/or uneducated, because certainly, if I were as smart/educated as them, I would be using syn. too.
In reality, I have probably studied this issue more in-depth than most of them, and I have come to the conclusion that the cost/benefit is better using plain old cheapo dino.
You do your own cost/benefit and see how the equation works out for you.
Could anyone explain to me the resistance of some to use a full synthetic oil. I'm new here but have read some posts that use cost as the determining factor although they do not think twice about having a $20.00 oil analysis done on inexpensive mineral oil.
Yes, we spend money on oil analysis. But the difference is that we're not doing that every oil change! We find out what works good, and go with that. Plus, UOA's provide good data that we can use so we KNOW our oil is protecting our engines, not blindly saying that something is better and spending more money on it without knowing the results. With syn, you're paying through the nose every time. I've seen some UOA's that actually show less wear metals with conventional than with synthetic!
You never did answer my question. Are you an Amsoil dealer?
jfsully, okay, you wanted to ask-here I am. In what arena would you like for me to tell you in regards to synthetics? We can discuss wear metals, thermal stability, cold pump rates, linear flow characteristics, resistance to corrosion, coking, formation of sludge, add packs, film strength, you name it.
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level
Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath
Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.