Notices

2.3L performance.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 02:03 PM
  #31  
Old Rob's Avatar
Old Rob
Junior User
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
For 2.3 performance parts you might try www.powerbyace.com
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 05:23 PM
  #32  
Pinhead-227's Avatar
Pinhead-227
Senior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
Have you ever heard of Singh Grooves?

 
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 10:23 PM
  #33  
fordnut71's Avatar
fordnut71
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: toronto
iv never seen or heard of them but im sure people here would like to know the reason behind them. im 1 of them wanting to know y, so please do tell
 
Reply
Old May 19, 2007 | 10:58 PM
  #34  
pud's Avatar
pud
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
no kidding, WTF do those do?
 
Reply
Old May 20, 2007 | 01:21 AM
  #35  
Pinhead-227's Avatar
Pinhead-227
Senior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
www.somender-singh.com
http://fueleconomytips.com/2005/11/24/groovy-heads/
http://460ford.com/viewtopic.php?t=9947&highlight=
http://mpgresearch.com/viewforum.php?f=48
http://mpgresearch.com/viewtopic.php?t=160

I have been busy with much of the same. Most of my work is with race cars and an occasional street driven hot rod. Here's an example of my involvement.

A good friend, Glenn was having problems with his super pro 66 Mustang. Some of you may recognize the car from Ford races in the Houston, New Orleans or Gulf Port areas. He runs a small flat tappet cam shaft in a high compression 351 Windsor. The car was running mid to low 10s but he was having problems with trace detonation at launch with a transbrake.

I cut grooves in his AFR heads and he opened the squish clearance. Normally I would expect the reduced squish to create detonation. The result was low RPM power that was too much for the car to handle. I was there for the first night out after the modification. The car ended up in the trailer because he couldn't control the wheel standing.

He has now softened the combination to allow launch with out excessive wheel standing. Needless to say he's convinced.

Here's some picture from his project and other recent activities.






The grooves help excite the mixture in the chamber, create turbulence, and direct turbulence where it can be used the most, near the spark plug. The more turbulence in the chamber before the plug fires, the faster the air/fuel will burn, and the less heat/fuel is wasted out of the exhaust. On carbuerated engines with no other modifications, you can lean out your jets by 20% without doing any other major tuning. The Grooves' biggest advantage, however, is detonation resistance. Engines that have light pinging or are on the verge of pinging will benefit the most from the mod. Engines that don't ping would benefit from the groove and higher compression. Since the groove extends detonation tolerance, higher compression can be run without having to fill up with higher octane fuel. 10.5:1 on 87 octane fuel is pretty much the norm for an engine with Singh Grooves without worrying about detonatin/ping.
 
Reply
Old May 30, 2007 | 09:56 PM
  #36  
Pinhead-227's Avatar
Pinhead-227
Senior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
Bringing this discussion back to life, I talked to the mechanic that did the modifications to the 2.5L cylinder head. The 2.5L/Auto tranny Ranger was getting ~23mpg consistently over a 3 month period. After the head work, the power went up to 3.0L V6 levels and gas mileage went up to 29mpg. It also idles VERY smooth and tends to run a bit cooler.

http://powrehaus.com/2006/09/21/ford...ad-w6-grooves/
 

Last edited by Pinhead-227; May 30, 2007 at 09:58 PM. Reason: Added Link
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 06:08 PM
  #37  
fordnut71's Avatar
fordnut71
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: toronto
i would like to know how they would do on a emmision testing seeing i have to do them here.
might be ok for mpg but might send the emmisions out of range
 
Reply
Old May 31, 2007 | 11:23 PM
  #38  
Pinhead-227's Avatar
Pinhead-227
Senior User
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
From: Overland Park, KS
Numerous tests have shown emissions to drop through the floor. Can you fail for putting out too little emissions? HC, CO, and NOx go down, CO2 and H2O go up. Not a single car tested that have had these modifications done have done worse than stock; all of them have improved.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

 Joe Kucinski
story-1

AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

 Brett Foote
story-2

Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-3

Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

 Verdad Gallardo
story-4

10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

 Joe Kucinski
story-5

2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

 Brett Foote
story-6

2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

 Joe Kucinski
story-8

Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

 Brett Foote
story-9

5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

 Joe Kucinski
Old Jun 3, 2007 | 05:07 PM
  #39  
99F150's Avatar
99F150
Fleet Mechanic
20 Year Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,344
Likes: 12
From: Sioux Falls SD
Interesting concept, but I do not see how it is improving MPG by any thing that significant.

I have a 2.5 in my 99 Supercab with a 5speed, is any info available using E85 as a fuel? I have a Custom Diablo chip burned to run E85 and am thinking of shaving the head and putting big pistons in to raise the compresion ratio to around 12 or 13:1 to burn the Ethanol more efficently.
Dan
 
Reply
Old Jul 1, 2007 | 12:02 AM
  #40  
pud's Avatar
pud
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
theoretically it would increase mileage from the ability to run a higher compression ratio, which would increase your volumetric efficiency...theoretically. Also claims to be able to lean out the air:fuel ratio which would do it.
The increased compression ratio would increase cylinder pressure, which would then make your fuel mixture more explosive and release more energy out of the same amount of fuel. Therefore the added energy moves your vehicle further/easier.
 
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 06:47 AM
  #41  
fordnut71's Avatar
fordnut71
Senior User
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 223
Likes: 0
From: toronto
well i think its a mighty big claim
im not saying it dont work but if it do u think the car companys would have already have been doing this. im sure the cost of cutting the groves in the head would be a cost factor
for me im kinda on the fence on this 1. i think id like to see some dyno numbers before i beleave it
 
Reply
Old Jul 2, 2007 | 11:20 AM
  #42  
pud's Avatar
pud
Posting Guru
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,955
Likes: 0
From: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Originally Posted by fordnut71
well i think its a mighty big claim
im not saying it dont work but if it do u think the car companys would have already have been doing this. im sure the cost of cutting the groves in the head would be a cost factor
for me im kinda on the fence on this 1. i think id like to see some dyno numbers before i beleave it
ditto, Im still very intruiged. Even if it only reduces detonation so I can run 10.5:1 on 87 ill be laughing. Also if thats the case then I should be able to run like 14:1 on propane.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
truckman87
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
8
Oct 3, 2016 09:38 PM
Woodtroll
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
3
Dec 26, 2014 05:43 PM
YakRancher62
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
5
Jul 8, 2013 10:34 AM
chickinabigtruck
1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
7
Aug 21, 2011 12:31 PM
joey little
1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series
7
Mar 8, 2006 03:16 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:55 AM.

story-0
Top 10 Ford Truck Tragedies

Slideshow: Top 10 Ford truck tragedies.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-18 19:34:33


VIEW MORE
story-1
AEV FXL Super Duty - the Super Duty Raptor Ford Doesn't Make

And it might be even better than that.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-18 19:26:42


VIEW MORE
story-2
Lobo Vs Lobo: Proof the F-150 Lobo Should Be Even Lower!

Slideshow: Does lowering an F-150 Lobo RUIN the ride quality?

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-18 19:20:37


VIEW MORE
story-3
Ford's 2001 Explorer Sportsman Concept Looks For a New Home

Slideshow: Ford's bizarre fishing-themed Explorer concept has resurfaced after spending decades largely forgotten.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-05-12 18:07:46


VIEW MORE
story-4
10 Best Ford Truck Engines We Miss the Most!

Slideshow: The 10 best Ford truck engines we miss the most.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-12 13:09:47


VIEW MORE
story-5
2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road: Better Than a Raptor R?

Slideshow: first look at the 810 hp 2026 Shelby F-150 Off-Road!

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-12 12:50:07


VIEW MORE
story-6
2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package First Look: 12 Things You NEED to Know!

Slideshow: Everything You Need to Know about the 2027 Super Duty Carhartt Package!

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-05-07 17:51:06


VIEW MORE
story-7
10 Most Surprising 2026 Ford Truck Features!

Slideshow: 10 most surprising Ford truck options/features in 2026.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-05 11:17:22


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Ford Trucks Coming to Mecum Indy 2026

Slideshow: Here are the top 10 Fords coming to Mecum Indy 2026.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-04 13:49:49


VIEW MORE
story-9
5 Best / 5 Worst Ford Truck Wheels of All Time

Slideshow: The 5 best and 5 worst Ford truck wheels of all time

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-04-29 16:49:01


VIEW MORE