2.3L performance. - Page 3 - Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums



2.3L performance.

Reply
 
 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
  #31  
Old 02-08-2007, 02:03 PM
Old Rob Old Rob is offline
Junior User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 68
Old Rob is starting off with a positive reputation.
For 2.3 performance parts you might try www.powerbyace.com
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05-19-2007, 05:23 PM
Pinhead-227 Pinhead-227 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 149
Pinhead-227 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Have you ever heard of Singh Grooves?

Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-19-2007, 10:23 PM
fordnut71 fordnut71 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: toronto
Posts: 222
fordnut71 is starting off with a positive reputation.
iv never seen or heard of them but im sure people here would like to know the reason behind them. im 1 of them wanting to know y, so please do tell
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 05-19-2007, 10:58 PM
pud pud is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,955
pud is starting off with a positive reputation.
no kidding, WTF do those do?
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 05-20-2007, 01:21 AM
Pinhead-227 Pinhead-227 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 149
Pinhead-227 is starting off with a positive reputation.
www.somender-singh.com
http://fueleconomytips.com/2005/11/24/groovy-heads/
http://460ford.com/viewtopic.php?t=9947&highlight=
http://mpgresearch.com/viewforum.php?f=48
http://mpgresearch.com/viewtopic.php?t=160

Quote:
I have been busy with much of the same. Most of my work is with race cars and an occasional street driven hot rod. Here's an example of my involvement.

A good friend, Glenn was having problems with his super pro 66 Mustang. Some of you may recognize the car from Ford races in the Houston, New Orleans or Gulf Port areas. He runs a small flat tappet cam shaft in a high compression 351 Windsor. The car was running mid to low 10s but he was having problems with trace detonation at launch with a transbrake.

I cut grooves in his AFR heads and he opened the squish clearance. Normally I would expect the reduced squish to create detonation. The result was low RPM power that was too much for the car to handle. I was there for the first night out after the modification. The car ended up in the trailer because he couldn't control the wheel standing.

He has now softened the combination to allow launch with out excessive wheel standing. Needless to say he's convinced.

Here's some picture from his project and other recent activities.






The grooves help excite the mixture in the chamber, create turbulence, and direct turbulence where it can be used the most, near the spark plug. The more turbulence in the chamber before the plug fires, the faster the air/fuel will burn, and the less heat/fuel is wasted out of the exhaust. On carbuerated engines with no other modifications, you can lean out your jets by 20% without doing any other major tuning. The Grooves' biggest advantage, however, is detonation resistance. Engines that have light pinging or are on the verge of pinging will benefit the most from the mod. Engines that don't ping would benefit from the groove and higher compression. Since the groove extends detonation tolerance, higher compression can be run without having to fill up with higher octane fuel. 10.5:1 on 87 octane fuel is pretty much the norm for an engine with Singh Grooves without worrying about detonatin/ping.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 05-30-2007, 09:56 PM
Pinhead-227 Pinhead-227 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 149
Pinhead-227 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Bringing this discussion back to life, I talked to the mechanic that did the modifications to the 2.5L cylinder head. The 2.5L/Auto tranny Ranger was getting ~23mpg consistently over a 3 month period. After the head work, the power went up to 3.0L V6 levels and gas mileage went up to 29mpg. It also idles VERY smooth and tends to run a bit cooler.

http://powrehaus.com/2006/09/21/ford...ad-w6-grooves/

Last edited by Pinhead-227; 05-30-2007 at 09:58 PM. Reason: Added Link
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 05-31-2007, 06:08 PM
fordnut71 fordnut71 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: toronto
Posts: 222
fordnut71 is starting off with a positive reputation.
i would like to know how they would do on a emmision testing seeing i have to do them here.
might be ok for mpg but might send the emmisions out of range
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 05-31-2007, 11:23 PM
Pinhead-227 Pinhead-227 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Overland Park, KS
Posts: 149
Pinhead-227 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Numerous tests have shown emissions to drop through the floor. Can you fail for putting out too little emissions? HC, CO, and NOx go down, CO2 and H2O go up. Not a single car tested that have had these modifications done have done worse than stock; all of them have improved.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-03-2007, 05:07 PM
99F150 99F150 is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sioux Falls SD
Posts: 1,279
99F150 is starting off with a positive reputation.
Interesting concept, but I do not see how it is improving MPG by any thing that significant.

I have a 2.5 in my 99 Supercab with a 5speed, is any info available using E85 as a fuel? I have a Custom Diablo chip burned to run E85 and am thinking of shaving the head and putting big pistons in to raise the compresion ratio to around 12 or 13:1 to burn the Ethanol more efficently.
Dan
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 07-01-2007, 12:02 AM
pud pud is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,955
pud is starting off with a positive reputation.
theoretically it would increase mileage from the ability to run a higher compression ratio, which would increase your volumetric efficiency...theoretically. Also claims to be able to lean out the air:fuel ratio which would do it.
The increased compression ratio would increase cylinder pressure, which would then make your fuel mixture more explosive and release more energy out of the same amount of fuel. Therefore the added energy moves your vehicle further/easier.
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 07-02-2007, 06:47 AM
fordnut71 fordnut71 is offline
Senior User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: toronto
Posts: 222
fordnut71 is starting off with a positive reputation.
well i think its a mighty big claim
im not saying it dont work but if it do u think the car companys would have already have been doing this. im sure the cost of cutting the groves in the head would be a cost factor
for me im kinda on the fence on this 1. i think id like to see some dyno numbers before i beleave it
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 07-02-2007, 11:20 AM
pud pud is offline
Posting Guru
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Quesnel, BC, Canada
Posts: 1,955
pud is starting off with a positive reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by fordnut71
well i think its a mighty big claim
im not saying it dont work but if it do u think the car companys would have already have been doing this. im sure the cost of cutting the groves in the head would be a cost factor
for me im kinda on the fence on this 1. i think id like to see some dyno numbers before i beleave it
ditto, Im still very intruiged. Even if it only reduces detonation so I can run 10.5:1 on 87 ill be laughing. Also if thats the case then I should be able to run like 14:1 on propane.
Reply With Quote
 
 
Reply

Related Topics
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Possible new Ranger purchase. Need Help truckman87 Ranger & B-Series 8 10-03-2016 09:38 PM
2004 2.3L; Failure to Start, No Codes Woodtroll Ranger & B-Series 3 12-26-2014 05:43 PM
'96 F250 XL 7.5 L w/ starter motor mystery YakRancher62 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 5 07-08-2013 10:34 AM
cracks in my flywheel chickinabigtruck 1987 - 1996 F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks 7 08-21-2011 12:31 PM
93 2.3 ranger will not fire any spark plugs joey little Ranger & B-Series 7 03-08-2006 03:16 PM


Go Back   Ford Truck Enthusiasts Forums > >

Tags
23, 23l, cam, engine, engines, ford, head, high, octane, perfomance, performance, ping, preformance, ranger, rpm

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 AM.