1983 - 2012 Ranger & B-Series All Ford Ranger and Mazda B-Series models

Ranger Flareside vs. Styleside?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
  #16  
Old 06-10-2004, 03:22 PM
mikemc's Avatar
mikemc
mikemc is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 858
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It really comes down to personal preference. I personally like the stepside on a Ranger and think they are really sharp, especially on a regular cab truck. You give up some bed space, but the side step is handy for certain situations, especially if you have a tool box towards the front of the bed its easier to access the tool box from the side of the truck.
 
  #17  
Old 06-10-2004, 10:03 PM
AG4.0's Avatar
AG4.0
AG4.0 is offline
Posting Guru
Join Date: May 2003
Location: York, NE
Posts: 1,211
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Styleside is my preference. I don't like anything about the Flareside, ugly (IMO), more drag lowering highway mileage, less cargo area and I've used the extra space on numerous occasions. I also have a tool box in mine that wouldn't fit a flareside, or if they do make them, won't hold as much stuf, and it's full enough the way it is. I guess I just plain don't like them.
Also note that for 05, the Flareside is out.
http://www.fordaxz.com/pdf/2005.ranger.og.pdf
In the major product changes section.
While I don't like them, it's a shame to see them doing away with it there are a lot of people that do, and I see lots of them on the road. They just don't fit my style.
 

Last edited by AG4.0; 06-10-2004 at 10:17 PM.
  #18  
Old 06-11-2004, 03:32 PM
Redranger03's Avatar
Redranger03
Redranger03 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by AG4.0
Styleside is my preference. I don't like anything about the Flareside, ugly (IMO), more drag lowering highway mileage, less cargo area and I've used the extra space on numerous occasions. I also have a tool box in mine that wouldn't fit a flareside, or if they do make them, won't hold as much stuf, and it's full enough the way it is. I guess I just plain don't like them.
.




OK, but how do you REALLY feel about Flaresides?
 
  #19  
Old 06-13-2004, 06:47 PM
WXboy's Avatar
WXboy
WXboy is offline
Cargo Master
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Central KY
Posts: 3,338
Received 335 Likes on 203 Posts
I've owned both, and in my opinion the flareside bed is a joke. What's the point? The only thing that will fit back there is a push mower or maybe some groceries. In my opinion, Ford needs to offer the 7' styleside bed on ALL Rangers...then it would be a useful truck.
 
  #20  
Old 06-13-2004, 06:59 PM
J McGuire's Avatar
J McGuire
J McGuire is offline
Junior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Tampa Bay
Posts: 77
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flareside, styleside

I've had 4 Rangers, three styleside and the present one is a flareside. All the replys I have read so far are valid. In my case I chose the flareside for 2 reasons none of which aforementioned. I feel like I'm waxing something different,but the primary reason is when "Carl Careless" says "Hey buddy how about letting me use your truck to haul some lava rock to put around my garden" I tell him "That's not a truck, look at the little bed, ask Jack, he has a real truck". If I need real big things, trailers are cheap to rent.
 
  #21  
Old 06-14-2004, 06:07 PM
Redranger03's Avatar
Redranger03
Redranger03 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by J McGuire
the primary reason is when "Carl Careless" says "Hey buddy how about letting me use your truck to haul some lava rock to put around my garden" I tell him "That's not a truck, look at the little bed, ask Jack, he has a real truck". If I need real big things, trailers are cheap to rent.


Well said, J McGuire! When you have a truck, it seems like everyone and his uncle wants to borrow it.
 
  #22  
Old 06-14-2004, 06:15 PM
Redranger03's Avatar
Redranger03
Redranger03 is offline
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 442
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by WXboy
I've owned both, and in my opinion the flareside bed is a joke. What's the point? .


Have you forgotten the pick-ups of the '30's, '40's and most of the '50's? they were all Flare/Step sides, and they did the job.
 
  #23  
Old 06-14-2004, 06:26 PM
splashtm's Avatar
splashtm
splashtm is offline
Senior User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Eastern Taxachusetts
Posts: 331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Amen, Redranger!
I still lose out on the 'borrow a real truck' thing. I get the "it's more space than I got in my leased VW Tourag". and then they complain that the tailgate has to stay down to haul the new lawntractor they had to buy but were too dang cheap to rent a trailer to bring home!
Oh, well! I guess flairside is better than nothing.
 
  #24  
Old 07-07-2012, 11:57 PM
johndi's Avatar
johndi
johndi is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Questions about pre 72, 73-79 and 80-86 short boxes?

Hi

I now this is a little off topic.

I am having trouble finding information to tell these boxes apart and what style they are.

I have a 76 short box style side or is it a flareside i believe it is a style side?

My box has the 90 degree bends. How similar are the boxes from a 73-79 and 80-86? Besides the bolt pattern for the fenders are they even near the same box?

All boxes prior to 73 had the 45 degree bend?

I can find no information explaining the differences in boxes, terminology and what is interchangeable.

Does anyone know of anybody or anyone that has the side panels for a 73-79 for sale?

Any help would be greatly appreciated

John
 
  #25  
Old 07-10-2012, 09:44 AM
78ford4x4Bigred's Avatar
78ford4x4Bigred
78ford4x4Bigred is offline
New User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flareside all the way. Mine is just reg cab though. I'd love to get a red extended cab flareside .
 
  #26  
Old 07-02-2013, 09:30 AM
DaveWilliams's Avatar
DaveWilliams
DaveWilliams is offline
Elder User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 649
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Flare side for sure.

I previously owned a 2002 F350 long box crew cab dually. I loved the dually for hauling the 9500 pound fifth wheel around. Since I upgraded to a motorhome, I sold the fifth wheel and the Dually. Well sometimes you just need a truck. I opted for the Ranger with the flare sides just because it looks like my old Dually and has the appearance of the bigger truck. I got a sweet deal since this Ranger has already had the 97 Explorer V-8 and AWD drive train added. It is a 4 door flare side so it still looks like a Dually with the "wide hips" as my wife called them, and now I have the rumble of the 5.0 V-8 to boot...Hope yall like the picture. Dave

[/IMG]
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bfree65
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
06-11-2022 09:22 AM
emgee
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
9
08-16-2017 08:25 PM
Lagunero1
1973 - 1979 F-100 & Larger F-Series Trucks
1
11-30-2015 07:55 PM
Silver150
2004 - 2008 F150
21
06-28-2011 11:14 PM
Hawkeye_Mike
1980 - 1986 Bullnose F100, F150 & Larger F-Series Trucks
15
12-13-2007 09:12 PM



Quick Reply: Ranger Flareside vs. Styleside?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.