Turbo lag ??
#16
#17
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 2,203
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I've driven a number of different vehicles with turbos, including a motorcycle with one and all had some lag - some more than others.
I had a '88 Ford Turbo-coupe T-bird that I really liked. Generally it's lag wasn't bad.
Compared to the other vehicles, predominately sports cars, the 6.0 can be bad some times - especially when cold.
I had a '88 Ford Turbo-coupe T-bird that I really liked. Generally it's lag wasn't bad.
Compared to the other vehicles, predominately sports cars, the 6.0 can be bad some times - especially when cold.
#19
#20
Turbo lag is the delay in response that occurs when you push the accelerator.
Turbos obviously perform much better when more fuel is being used by the engine. More fuel=more exhaust=turbo spins faster=better performance. Therefore, you will notice better performance when you are running at higher RPM.
The effects of both of these were improved greatly with the EVRT turbo.
Turbos obviously perform much better when more fuel is being used by the engine. More fuel=more exhaust=turbo spins faster=better performance. Therefore, you will notice better performance when you are running at higher RPM.
The effects of both of these were improved greatly with the EVRT turbo.
#21
![Wink](images/icons/icon12.gif)
IMO the 6.o has much more turbo lag. The reason I say this is because under a load (19,500 lbs) and taking off in 1st gear from a dead stop I only push 8 lbs of boost @1000 rpm. It's a dog off the line. It wont get out of it's own way. But by 1500 I'm at 14 still way off the 34 lbs I push at peak @2700. From there on the turbo has "spooled up". I run the R's to 3,500 and shift to the next gear dropping R's to 2,700 still pushing 34 lbs of boost never leaving the powerband. (here is where I walk away from all stock Cummins equipped Dodges. They make all their power down low.) Diesels need boost to make horsepower. Remember the days of the old 7.3 IDI non turbo. What a gutless wonder. Had torque like no ones business though. It reminds me of a 6.0 running under 1,500 RPM.
#22
Originally Posted by darylhunter
I've driven a number of different vehicles with turbos, including a motorcycle with one and all had some lag - some more than others.
I had a '88 Ford Turbo-coupe T-bird that I really liked. Generally it's lag wasn't bad.
Compared to the other vehicles, predominately sports cars, the 6.0 can be bad some times - especially when cold.
I had a '88 Ford Turbo-coupe T-bird that I really liked. Generally it's lag wasn't bad.
Compared to the other vehicles, predominately sports cars, the 6.0 can be bad some times - especially when cold.
Cold they should be a bit of a sloth from a start.
#23
Originally Posted by darylhunter
I've driven a number of different vehicles with turbos, including a motorcycle with one and all had some lag - some more than others.
I had a '88 Ford Turbo-coupe T-bird that I really liked. Generally it's lag wasn't bad.
Compared to the other vehicles, predominately sports cars, the 6.0 can be bad some times - especially when cold.
I had a '88 Ford Turbo-coupe T-bird that I really liked. Generally it's lag wasn't bad.
Compared to the other vehicles, predominately sports cars, the 6.0 can be bad some times - especially when cold.
#25
#26
#27
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Carlsbad, California
Posts: 2,203
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by 03f350crew
Thats strange? the turbo lag in my 6.0 is worse when it is warmer weather. I does seem to get better as it runs longer.
Daryl
#28
#29
Originally Posted by darylhunter
I should have said when the engine is cold. When the engine is warm and the outside temp is cold (well cool any way because I live in San Diego :-) it runs great.
Daryl
Daryl
#30