Help With An Essay
I am writing a persuasive essay in my English class, and the topic is up to us. And with me being a die-hard Ford guy, I had to choose Ford vs. Ch*vy vs. D*dge and why Ford is the best as my topic. I was just wondering if anyone had any good points I could use in my essay to make everyone else in my class a believer. Any comments would help
Drew
I'd suggest you go down to your local Ford dealership and ask the salesmen. They'll be able to spout off loads of reasons you can include.
Here's one I can think of:
1. Matt Kenseth 2003 championship winner - he drives a ford.
I'm sure I'll come up with more, let me think.
Ford has better ground clearance than Chevy
Ford has the best interior room
Ford is more environmentally responsible (you'll really have to do some research on this one) than Chevy-Chevy uses an 8.1L V8 as their largest gas engine, Ford eliminated the 460 for the more fuel efficient and more powerful V10, the Dodge Hemi is a gas guzzler from what I've heard
Ford (and Chevy) offer a 5-speed automatic transmission, Dodge does not
For me, two phrases say it all: Best selling pickup for 28 (??) years. 2004 Motor Trend Truck of the Year was F-150.
Also, just an idea I had. If you really feel like doing research, find out which maker has the highest 5-star Chrash ratings per brand. That would be interesting if it was Ford.
I don't know if I speak for everyone out there, but as a loyal Ford fan, I wouldn't mind reading this paper once it's finished. So, if you happen to find some time over the summer to put it on the Internet, don't forget your friends at FTE and give us a link.
If I think of anything else, I'll post it later. Hope I helped.
IFS vs solid, etc..., Cummins Vs Powerstroke.. But all this and WAY WAY more is here, just read.
Ron
00 Excursion V-10 4x4
Trending Topics
Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts
ktmguy70, then we might as well shut down this forum and not allow any new posts.
BTW, I just tried the "build and price" on the Dodge website and you can't get the 5-speed auto with the Cummins.
Last edited by johnsdiesel; Apr 28, 2004 at 09:25 AM.
I do Enjoy the TECHNICAL discussions and Comparisons, which is what this is all supposed to be base upon. HOWEVER. all technical discussions go out the window VERy soon and are replaced with the " My uncle has 3 chevys and the motors all blew within 10,000 miles" Or " They just Suck, I drove one 25 years ago and got a flat tire so I know for a fact that they're junk".
But that's the main problem. There will always be opinions, especially from those who are incapable of accepting the facts. Also facts can be skewed and twisted to support an opinion. Facts may emerge which do not conform to a predisposed opinion, often these facts are not acknowledged.
Preconceived opinions are usually outdated, and may not apply to new available products, but nonetheless, they are spouted as though they still apply. This is called bias.
Here's an example; Hydroformed frames.
Hydroformed frames offer different characteristics - some advantageous, from standard C channel frames. Ford guy and Dodge guy get into it over
these frames. Both use facts to support their preconceived opinions.
Dodge guy states the advantage in torsional stiffness regarding
hydroformed frames. Ford guy counters with the fact that his frame does
not require special welding or bolting techniques, and that boxed frames usually use thinner steels to begin with. Dodge guy states that it dosent matter because his frame is manufactured more precisely with less variation in material thicknesses. He then goes on to say his frame is lighter -reducing weight. Ford guy comes back with a statement that the weight savings is negligable, the real savings being made in DC's bank account. So far both
are right. At this point GM guy steps in and states his frame is best because
it uses hydroformed boxed front members for torsional stiffness and controlled
impact resistance, while utilising roll formed steel in a center section for
better resistance to RBM, and a C stamped tail section for strength and simplicity - especially when mounting aftermarket hitches which require drilling and welding. He's correct too. Needless to say, if all three used fully boxed, hydroformed frames - everyone would at least agree on one thing.
This shows that biased people are not willing to accept facts which may run contrary to their preconcieved notions of what brand is best.
(I'm with GM guy on the frames BTW...
)
Drew


