Notices

Lowering Comperssion?????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 09:38 AM
  #1  
72f100's Avatar
72f100
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
Lowering Comperssion?????

Yeah, I sad lowering compression. Here's the problem: I have a 72 F-100 on a 76 highboy chassis. It's got about 4" of lift on it and 38" Ground Hawgs. I love my truck and I love driving it but the 8mpg is killing me and the roughly 10.7:1 compression means 92octane min. OUCH The engine came out of a 66 T-Bird and they had 10.5:1 stock. I figure w/ the overbore and new pistons it has been bumped up a couple of 10th's. Did the later model FE's, such as the "emissions years" have larger chambers in the heads or did they just use dished pistons to lower the compression? I really don't want to pull the pistons out as this engine has >10k mi on it and runs beautifully. I could get a set of mid 70's heads pretty cheap and if that would drop the compression enough to let me run 87 octane that would be great. Any advise for a poor college boy tired of paying $2/gal to feed a truck getting 8mpg round town????
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 12:53 PM
  #2  
FERacing66's Avatar
FERacing66
Posting Guru
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,354
Likes: 0
From: Jackassville
well, id hate to decrease the power of that high boy, my recommendation is get a cheap Japanese car or something to drive around around town and just drive your truck on the weekend. its a crime to intentionally decrease the power of your vehicle.
 
Reply
Old Mar 18, 2004 | 01:17 PM
  #3  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
I'm not sure about the good old stock 10.5:1 4bbl 390, but the cam is matched to the compression. To lower the compression enough to run 87, the cam is not going to make near it's normal power, and you just might blow the mileage even further, making the move to 87 worthless.

Have you even tried a lower octane? Back off on the timing, you'll lose idle vacuum, but you might be able to get away with 87 with the right timing and a well-cooled motor - and then, you could go back to 92 at will when you wanted the power.

Run-on might be a problem though
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 06:49 AM
  #4  
72f100's Avatar
72f100
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
w/ the timing set at 6deg BTDC I tried mixing about 5-7gal of premium in the tank w/ about 5gal of 89 and it spark knocked so bad I swore I'd never try that again. I don't think it's possible to back the timing off enough to run 87.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 08:16 AM
  #5  
rusty70f100's Avatar
rusty70f100
Post Fiend
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 8,600
Likes: 4
From: Iowa
You might try finding some thicker head gaskets. Also, you could pull the heads and unshroud the valves and polish the chambers. This will free up a few CC's and some horsepower.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 12:49 PM
  #6  
BB's Avatar
BB
Post Fiend
25 Year Member
Joined: Feb 2000
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 8
From: Brea CA
Your heads (if they're C6 something) already have bigger chambers than any of the later heads from the "emission years." Thicker head gaskets will lower the compression but also will negate the quench zone in your heads. What you gain in one hand you will lose in the other. Hey, since you already got some compression, how about running a bigger cam with more overlap? It's the overlap that will save you, increasing it will bleed off some of the effective cylinder pressure to something you can live with pump gas.

Let me explain this a little better, it's not just the overlap by itself but the relationship of the Lobe Seperation Angle (LSA) for a given overlap. By increasing duration for a given LSA, the overlap will increase, the intake closing will be delayed, and the exhaust opening will occur earlier. This will decrease cylinder pressure but the decrease/bleed-off of compression is not due to the overlap only, it is due to the intake closing and exhaust opening events.

Having said that, maybe Ratsmoker and the guys here with dyno programs can help you pick a better cam.
 
Reply
Old Mar 19, 2004 | 01:04 PM
  #7  
krewat's Avatar
krewat
FTE Leadership Emeritus
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 42,561
Likes: 423
From: Long Island USA
Club FTE Gold Member
Originally posted by BB
Hey, since you already got some compression, how about running a bigger cam with more overlap? It's the overlap that will save you, increasing it will bleed off some of the effective cylinder pressure to something you can live with pump gas.
Holy crap! What a GREAT idea!

Wish I had thought of it

Quick edit: I wonder how long it will take to make up the cost of the cam with the cheaper gas?
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 09:10 AM
  #8  
mlf72f250's Avatar
mlf72f250
Elder User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Sounds like you guys have covered most of the good solutions.
Here are a few more "low cost" solutions to think about.

Did the engine knock like that from day one, or did it get worse
over time? It may be excess carbon buildup in the chamber. You could clean it with the water trickle method or use a bottle (or two) of Techron Concentrate.

Another thought is water injection. It kicks in a water mist only at WOT. I've not had a need to do it myself, but in theory, it should be a good solution -- just don't forget to fill up the water tank.

Another thought that may be to run a cooler thermostat, slightly retarded timing (are you sure the marks on the balancer haven't slipped?), and then get away with the RUL/PUL or mid-grade mix.

But you know, that is a lot of compression, so maybe the best bet is still to check into that cam swap.

Good luck and let us know how it goes.
 
Reply
FTE Stories

Ford Trucks for Ford Truck Enthusiasts

story-0

This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

 Verdad Gallardo
story-1

Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

 Joe Kucinski
story-2

3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

 Brett Foote
story-3

10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

 Pouria Savadkouei
story-4

Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

 Brett Foote
story-5

10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

 Joe Kucinski
story-6

10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

 Michael S. Palmer
story-7

Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

 Verdad Gallardo
story-8

Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

 Joe Kucinski
story-9

2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

 Brett Foote
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 07:00 PM
  #9  
Like M. Fords's Avatar
Like M. Fords
Elder User
25 Year Member
Joined: Jun 1999
Posts: 940
Likes: 0
From: LAT 46.55501° & LON -122
I have been interested in this topic for the same reasons as the original poster.

Fel-Pro makes some .020 head gasket shims. I don't know much about these like if they can be stacked, or how much they reduce compression, but I would guess the effect would be the same as thicker gaskets.
Other than the power loss from lower compression, how badly does increasing the quench area affect performance?

I was thinking of trying colder plugs, but I haven't been able to find any Autolites colder than 45's.

I was thinking of a different cam also. The one I have now is a Comp Cams 268. How does this compare to Crane's 901 in relation to LSA and duration like "BB" was talking about?
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 07:22 PM
  #10  
Scouder's Avatar
Scouder
Posting Guru
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,117
Likes: 0
From: Evanston, WY
Club FTE Silver Member

Just a thought. Make sure you are jetted correctly. A lean condition will magnify a detonation problem. Running a little fat will sometimes make enough margin to alleviate the problem.

-Scouder
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 07:23 PM
  #11  
mlf72f250's Avatar
mlf72f250
Elder User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Like M. Fords
...Other than the power loss from lower compression, how badly does increasing the quench area affect performance?
The quench/squish zone probably does someting, but I'd guess that would be a bigger deal on the low end. CAR CRAFT did an interesting study a few years ago where they stepped compression ratio from 8:1 up to 12:1. Each number netted them about a 4% increase in horsepower, so going from 8:1 to 12:1 would get you 16%. I'm sure it's not exactly proportional and you'd reach the a point of diminishing returns, but it was kind of a cool exercise. Their effect was combined, as they did nothing to separate the compression from the squish effects. I think they used multiple head gaskets, but I can't remember if they were shim or composite types.

I think DeskTop Dyno 2000 showed a bigger effect, but, even though I love that program, I trust a real dyno more.

Smokey Yunik (sp?) used to recommend using a double head gasket for knock problems, but Ive never tried it myself.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 08:51 PM
  #12  
rv4alex's Avatar
rv4alex
New User
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
72F100

I am an A&P instructor, I teach people to work on airplanes. One of areas that is tought is fuels. The octane rating is actually the ratio of iso-octane to normal Heptain, with the Iso-octane being the active portion and the anti-knock ingrediant. Aviation fuels have ranged from 80-88 octain to 115-130. To get above 100 many additives are used. One of the most common addatives in fuel is lead. If you are not running a C-Converter, adding lead is one of the more cost affective ways of reducing knock.

Use a good brand of fuel, you may have had some cheap stuff. Shell or amaco (BP), make sure that there is no MTBS or gasahol and run a little lead, then try adjusting your timing. If knocking still persists, try enriching the mixture. A hotter running engine will knock before a cool running engine so you might try running a cooler thermostat.

Enjoy being a poor college kid, pretty soon you will be a poor married guy with two kids like me. Your truck will sit in your back yard or worse, your wife will comandeer it. In order to be able to afford to keep the truck, I drive an 89 toy camery with 246000 miles on it.
 
Reply
Old Mar 22, 2004 | 09:10 PM
  #13  
mlf72f250's Avatar
mlf72f250
Elder User
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 799
Likes: 0
Here's a nice reference:
http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuel...rgas/ch5.shtml

Look at Figure 5-9 near the bottom of the page. It shows things that affect octane requirements for engines.
For example, each compression ratio number increase needs a 3 to 5 octane number increase to prevent knock.
 
Reply
Old Mar 23, 2004 | 02:18 PM
  #14  
72f100's Avatar
72f100
Thread Starter
|
Senior User
20 Year Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 379
Likes: 0
let me restate my title, I am a poor, married, college boy who's paying his own way.
I really don't have any trouble w/ detonation unless I run something other than premium. I've considered adding lead to the fuel but w/ the crazy compression this engine has I doubt it will be enough to drop down a fuel grade. The engine runs pretty cool w/ the 180 T-stat thats in it so a cooler stat will probably not do much either. I hate to think that I'm stuck w/ a premium loving gas hog but it may be an unavoidable problem. In the end I may have to end up selling my baby to get something a little easier on the wallet
If I didn't already have 3 cars I would probably just buy some cheap little gas sipper so I could keep the beast.
 
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
GermanMike
Modular V10 (6.8l)
12
Feb 10, 2025 01:54 PM
dimora
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
22
May 30, 2016 09:41 PM
Cobra-Kai
Small Block V8 (221, 260, 289, 5.0/302, 5.8/351W)
13
Apr 1, 2014 04:28 PM
Matts72
335 Series- 5.8/351M, 6.6/400, 351 Cleveland
1
Apr 17, 2005 08:16 PM
dhickey
FE & FT Big Block V8 (332, 352, 360, 390, 406, 410, 427, 428)
6
Oct 18, 2002 06:20 PM




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.

story-0
This Hennessey Takes the Expedition Tremor's Off-Roading Capability to the Next Level

Slideshow: The VelociRaptor Expedition gains a lift, upgraded suspension, Brembo brakes, and trail-ready equipment while retaining the stock 440-horsepower EcoBoost V6.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-12 11:01:55


VIEW MORE
story-1
Top 10 Fords at 2026 Carlisle Ford Nationals

Slideshow: Top 10 Fords at 2026 Ford Nationals

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-09 11:10:08


VIEW MORE
story-2
3 Best / 3 Worst Parts of Modern Ford Ownership

Based on years of owning multiple modern Ford products.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-09 10:53:36


VIEW MORE
story-3
10 Amazing Upgrades That Solve Common Ford Truck Owner Headaches

SPONSORED: From muddy boots to rain-soaked cargo, these upgrades address some of the most common frustrations Ford truck owners face every day.

By Pouria Savadkouei | 2026-06-08 18:50:34


VIEW MORE
story-4
Every 2026 Ford Engine Explained

Here's everything you need to know about every Ford engine available for the 2026 model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-06-05 12:58:01


VIEW MORE
story-5
10 Ugly Ford Trucks That We Still Kinda Love

Slideshow: 10 ugly Ford trucks that we still kinda love.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-06-03 09:51:16


VIEW MORE
story-6
10 Things Every Truck Owner NEEDS (2026 Edition)

Slideshow: the best gifts for dads & grads

By Michael S. Palmer | 2026-06-03 15:43:58


VIEW MORE
story-7
Rezvani's Latest Post-Apocalyptic Monster Is a Ford F-150 Raptor Underneath

Slideshow: Called the Fortress, the 850-horsepower pickup combines Raptor underpinnings with military-inspired features, survival equipment, and a starting price of $285,000.

By Verdad Gallardo | 2026-06-03 11:38:36


VIEW MORE
story-8
Top 10 Most Expensive Ford Trucks Ever Sold on Bring a Trailer

Slideshow: 10 most expensive Ford trucks ever sold on Bring a Trailer.

By Joe Kucinski | 2026-05-27 16:24:34


VIEW MORE
story-9
2027 Ford Super Duty Buyer's Guide (Every Model, Engine, & Package)

Here's everything that has changed for the latest model year.

By Brett Foote | 2026-05-27 16:17:28


VIEW MORE